Fix L low-end testing spec on chromium.android.fyi.

Fix L low-end testing spec on chromium.android.fyi.

notryin' because I'm impatient

TBR=jbudorick@chromium.org
NOTRY=true
BUG=670879
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2796443002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#461257}
Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/9d766b01914f09b20ef999b3aa6a676c38e65792

[bpastene, 2017-03-31 22:35:04]

Description was changed from

==========
Fix L low-end testing spec on chromium.android.fyi.

BUG=670879
==========

to

==========
Fix L low-end testing spec on chromium.android.fyi.

notryin' because I'm impatient

TBR=jbudorick@chromium.org
NOTRY=true
BUG=670879
==========

[bpastene, 2017-03-31 22:35:53]

bpastene@chromium.org changed reviewers:
+ jbudorick@chromium.org

[bpastene, 2017-03-31 22:35:57]

The CQ bit was checked by bpastene@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-03-31 22:36:30]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 
https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-03-31 22:42:46]

CQ is committing da patch.

Bot data: {"patchset_id": 1, "attempt_start_ts": 1490999757817650, "parent_rev":
"8e05f43c211c34bc5ad3f796021953d724e9f687", "commit_rev":
"9d766b01914f09b20ef999b3aa6a676c38e65792"}

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-03-31 22:43:33]

Description was changed from

==========
Fix L low-end testing spec on chromium.android.fyi.

notryin' because I'm impatient

TBR=jbudorick@chromium.org
NOTRY=true
BUG=670879
==========

to

==========
Fix L low-end testing spec on chromium.android.fyi.

notryin' because I'm impatient

TBR=jbudorick@chromium.org
NOTRY=true
BUG=670879

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2796443002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#461257}
Committed:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/9d766b01914f09b20ef999b3aa6a...
==========

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-03-31 22:43:34]

Committed patchset #1 (id:1) as
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/9d766b01914f09b20ef999b3aa6a...

[jbudorick, 2017-04-01 01:04:28]

NOTRYing because you're impatient is not a good habit to get in to...

lgtm

[bpastene, 2017-04-01 01:13:48]

On 2017/04/01 01:04:28, jbudorick wrote:
> NOTRYing because you're impatient is not a good habit to get in to...
> 
> lgtm

I don't see the harm here

[jbudorick, 2017-04-01 01:17:43]

On 2017/04/01 01:13:48, bpastene wrote:
> On 2017/04/01 01:04:28, jbudorick wrote:
> > NOTRYing because you're impatient is not a good habit to get in to...
> > 
> > lgtm
> 
> I don't see the harm here

It's a bad habit to get into. This immediate CL would not have been affected by
the trybots, but please do not get used to doing it. NOTRY is not for CLs that
you don't think will break anything or for CLs that you don't think will be
tested by the CQ; it's an escape hatch that should seldom be used outside of
reverts.

[jbudorick, 2017-04-01 01:18:11]

On 2017/04/01 01:17:43, jbudorick wrote:
> On 2017/04/01 01:13:48, bpastene wrote:
> > On 2017/04/01 01:04:28, jbudorick wrote:
> > > NOTRYing because you're impatient is not a good habit to get in to...
> > > 
> > > lgtm
> > 
> > I don't see the harm here
> 
> It's a bad habit to get into. This immediate CL would not have been affected
by
> the trybots, but please do not get used to doing it. NOTRY is not for CLs that
> you don't think will break anything or for CLs that you don't think will be
> tested by the CQ; it's an escape hatch that should seldom be used outside of
> reverts.

*especially* in combination with TBR.