Chromium Code Reviews| Index: third_party/WebKit/Source/core/editing/SelectionEditor.cpp |
| diff --git a/third_party/WebKit/Source/core/editing/SelectionEditor.cpp b/third_party/WebKit/Source/core/editing/SelectionEditor.cpp |
| index 615c5d770b4043b30b15b649f011dc21ed370af3..ba0b25356aa4229361fdde825b0699768f6103b3 100644 |
| --- a/third_party/WebKit/Source/core/editing/SelectionEditor.cpp |
| +++ b/third_party/WebKit/Source/core/editing/SelectionEditor.cpp |
| @@ -377,15 +377,22 @@ void SelectionEditor::updateCachedVisibleSelectionIfNeeded() const { |
| m_cachedVisibleSelectionInFlatTree = VisibleSelectionInFlatTree(); |
| return; |
| } |
| - m_cachedVisibleSelectionInFlatTree = createVisibleSelection( |
| - SelectionInFlatTree::Builder() |
| - .setBaseAndExtent(toPositionInFlatTree(m_selection.base()), |
| - toPositionInFlatTree(m_selection.extent())) |
| - .setAffinity(m_selection.affinity()) |
| - .setHasTrailingWhitespace(m_selection.hasTrailingWhitespace()) |
| - .setGranularity(m_selection.granularity()) |
| - .setIsDirectional(m_selection.isDirectional()) |
| - .build()); |
| + const PositionInFlatTree& base = toPositionInFlatTree(m_selection.base()); |
| + const PositionInFlatTree& extent = toPositionInFlatTree(m_selection.extent()); |
| + SelectionInFlatTree::Builder builder; |
| + builder.setAffinity(m_selection.affinity()) |
| + .setHasTrailingWhitespace(m_selection.hasTrailingWhitespace()) |
| + .setGranularity(m_selection.granularity()) |
| + .setIsDirectional(m_selection.isDirectional()); |
| + // TODO(editing-dev): Is it better to adjust base and extent if they are not |
| + // in flat tree? |
| + if (base.isNotNull() && extent.isNotNull()) |
| + builder.setBaseAndExtent(base, extent); |
| + else if (base.isNotNull()) |
| + builder.collapse(base); |
| + else if (extent.isNotNull()) |
| + builder.collapse(extent); |
| + m_cachedVisibleSelectionInFlatTree = createVisibleSelection(builder.build()); |
|
Xiaocheng
2017/03/27 18:17:45
Is it fine if the cached VS and VSInFlatTree have
yosin_UTC9
2017/03/29 03:20:21
So far, we did adjustment in [1] which removed adj
Xiaocheng
2017/03/29 23:56:40
OK. So the type mismatch currently exists, and wil
|
| } |
| void SelectionEditor::cacheRangeOfDocument(Range* range) { |