Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(207)

Issue 2757673004: PPC/s390: [regexp] Port RegExpExecStub to CSA (mostly) (Closed)

Created:
3 years, 9 months ago by JaideepBajwa
Modified:
3 years, 9 months ago
CC:
v8-reviews_googlegroups.com
Target Ref:
refs/pending/heads/master
Project:
v8
Visibility:
Public.

Description

PPC/s390: [regexp] Port RegExpExecStub to CSA (mostly) Port 5cc6189677066382dd206a68375b88e80ccd9afd Minor fix to the original CL's port of ppc/s390 Original Commit Message: This moves most of the logic contained in RegExpExecStub to CSA. Benefits are mostly easier readability and hackability, and removal of a large chunk of platform-specific assembly. Exit frame construction and the final call remain in RegExpExecStub. R=jgruber@chromium.org, joransiu@ca.ibm.com, jyan@ca.ibm.com, michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com BUG=v8:5339, v8:592 LOG=N Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2757673004 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43877} Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+/469b632e6599d518f83c30bf9f0d5f2f53c4ae15

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 2
Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+4 lines, -4 lines) Patch
M src/ppc/code-stubs-ppc.cc View 1 chunk +3 lines, -3 lines 2 comments Download
M src/s390/code-stubs-s390.cc View 1 chunk +1 line, -1 line 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 9 (3 generated)
JaideepBajwa
ptal
3 years, 9 months ago (2017-03-16 19:38:40 UTC) #1
john.yan
lgtm
3 years, 9 months ago (2017-03-16 19:39:38 UTC) #2
commit-bot: I haz the power
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.org/2757673004/1
3 years, 9 months ago (2017-03-16 19:40:49 UTC) #4
commit-bot: I haz the power
Committed patchset #1 (id:1) as https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+/469b632e6599d518f83c30bf9f0d5f2f53c4ae15
3 years, 9 months ago (2017-03-16 20:03:06 UTC) #7
jgruber
Thanks for the fixes! https://codereview.chromium.org/2757673004/diff/1/src/ppc/code-stubs-ppc.cc File src/ppc/code-stubs-ppc.cc (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/2757673004/diff/1/src/ppc/code-stubs-ppc.cc#newcode1248 src/ppc/code-stubs-ppc.cc:1248: __ mov(ip, Operand(address_of_regexp_stack_memory_size)); Out of ...
3 years, 9 months ago (2017-03-17 07:15:49 UTC) #8
john.yan
3 years, 9 months ago (2017-03-17 13:48:42 UTC) #9
Message was sent while issue was closed.
https://codereview.chromium.org/2757673004/diff/1/src/ppc/code-stubs-ppc.cc
File src/ppc/code-stubs-ppc.cc (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/2757673004/diff/1/src/ppc/code-stubs-ppc.cc#n...
src/ppc/code-stubs-ppc.cc:1248: __ mov(ip,
Operand(address_of_regexp_stack_memory_size));
On 2017/03/17 07:15:49, jgruber wrote:
> Out of curiosity, is ip not the instruction pointer? If it is, why can we
> overwrite it?

ip on ppc/s390 is the Inter Procedural register.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698