|
|
DescriptionPrefetch all WPR archives used by system_health_smoke_test
This also enables system_health_smoke_test on android.chromium bot (Android N5X Swarm Builder).
BUG=700426
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2752033002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#457813}
Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/cae53638598092a3a97ad4fd6fbe5addd9404d9a
Patch Set 1 #
Messages
Total messages: 29 (14 generated)
The CQ bit was checked by nednguyen@google.com to run a CQ dry run
Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
Dry run: This issue passed the CQ dry run.
Description was changed from ========== Prefetch all WPR archives used by system_health_smoke_test & reenable system_health_smoke_test BUG=700426 ========== to ========== Prefetch all WPR archives used by system_health_smoke_test This also enables system_health_smoke_test on android.chromium bot (Android N5X Swarm Builder). Note that we don't enable this on android_nexus5_rel_ng yet, as we will need some times to monitor the stability of this suite on android.chromium bot BUG=700426 ==========
Description was changed from ========== Prefetch all WPR archives used by system_health_smoke_test This also enables system_health_smoke_test on android.chromium bot (Android N5X Swarm Builder). Note that we don't enable this on android_nexus5_rel_ng yet, as we will need some times to monitor the stability of this suite on android.chromium bot BUG=700426 ========== to ========== Prefetch all WPR archives used by system_health_smoke_test This also enables system_health_smoke_test on android.chromium bot (Android N5X Swarm Builder). Note that we don't enable this on android_nexus5_rel_ng yet, as we will need some time to monitor the stability of this suite on android.chromium bot BUG=700426 ==========
Description was changed from ========== Prefetch all WPR archives used by system_health_smoke_test This also enables system_health_smoke_test on android.chromium bot (Android N5X Swarm Builder). Note that we don't enable this on android_nexus5_rel_ng yet, as we will need some time to monitor the stability of this suite on android.chromium bot BUG=700426 ========== to ========== Prefetch all WPR archives used by system_health_smoke_test This also enables system_health_smoke_test on android.chromium bot (Android N5X Swarm Builder). Note that we don't enable this on android_nexus5_rel_ng yet, as we want to verify stability of this suite on android.chromium bot first BUG=700426 ==========
Description was changed from ========== Prefetch all WPR archives used by system_health_smoke_test This also enables system_health_smoke_test on android.chromium bot (Android N5X Swarm Builder). Note that we don't enable this on android_nexus5_rel_ng yet, as we want to verify stability of this suite on android.chromium bot first BUG=700426 ========== to ========== Prefetch all WPR archives used by system_health_smoke_test This also enables system_health_smoke_test on android.chromium bot (Android N5X Swarm Builder). BUG=700426 ==========
nednguyen@google.com changed reviewers: + charliea@chromium.org, jam@chromium.org, jbudorick@chromium.org
+Charliea for changes to tools/perf
lgtm (although I'm not a tools/perf OWNER, you are)
On 2017/03/16 14:10:14, charliea wrote: > lgtm (although I'm not a tools/perf OWNER, you are) Ping Jam & John
On 2017/03/16 14:25:19, nednguyen wrote: > On 2017/03/16 14:10:14, charliea wrote: > > lgtm (although I'm not a tools/perf OWNER, you are) > > Ping Jam & John I defer to you and John; I don't think you need my review?
On 2017/03/16 14:25:19, nednguyen wrote: > On 2017/03/16 14:10:14, charliea wrote: > > lgtm (although I'm not a tools/perf OWNER, you are) > > Ping Jam & John I kicked a few more ANSR builds. The cycle time on the first one looked reasonable, though.
On 2017/03/16 15:45:27, jbudorick wrote: > On 2017/03/16 14:25:19, nednguyen wrote: > > On 2017/03/16 14:10:14, charliea wrote: > > > lgtm (although I'm not a tools/perf OWNER, you are) > > > > Ping Jam & John > > I kicked a few more ANSR builds. The cycle time on the first one looked > reasonable, though. Thanks! Please ping me again when you got the results from those builds.
On 2017/03/16 16:10:26, nednguyen wrote: > On 2017/03/16 15:45:27, jbudorick wrote: > > On 2017/03/16 14:25:19, nednguyen wrote: > > > On 2017/03/16 14:10:14, charliea wrote: > > > > lgtm (although I'm not a tools/perf OWNER, you are) > > > > > > Ping Jam & John > > > > I kicked a few more ANSR builds. The cycle time on the first one looked > > reasonable, though. > > Thanks! Please ping me again when you got the results from those builds. Ping John
On 2017/03/17 01:24:12, nednguyen wrote: > On 2017/03/16 16:10:26, nednguyen wrote: > > On 2017/03/16 15:45:27, jbudorick wrote: > > > On 2017/03/16 14:25:19, nednguyen wrote: > > > > On 2017/03/16 14:10:14, charliea wrote: > > > > > lgtm (although I'm not a tools/perf OWNER, you are) > > > > > > > > Ping Jam & John > > > > > > I kicked a few more ANSR builds. The cycle time on the first one looked > > > reasonable, though. > > > > Thanks! Please ping me again when you got the results from those builds. > > Ping John All the ANSR build are passing & taking ~12 minutes
On 2017/03/17 01:25:10, nednguyen wrote: > On 2017/03/17 01:24:12, nednguyen wrote: > > On 2017/03/16 16:10:26, nednguyen wrote: > > > On 2017/03/16 15:45:27, jbudorick wrote: > > > > On 2017/03/16 14:25:19, nednguyen wrote: > > > > > On 2017/03/16 14:10:14, charliea wrote: > > > > > > lgtm (although I'm not a tools/perf OWNER, you are) > > > > > > > > > > Ping Jam & John > > > > > > > > I kicked a few more ANSR builds. The cycle time on the first one looked > > > > reasonable, though. > > > > > > Thanks! Please ping me again when you got the results from those builds. > > > > Ping John > > All the ANSR build are passing & taking ~12 minutes Ping John, I kicked off a few more ANSR builds. The run times of these 10 builds are: 10 mins, 54 secs 10 mins, 51 secs 11 mins, 32 secs 11 mins, 28 secs 11 mins, 20 secs 12 mins, 2 secs 11 mins, 30 secs 12 mins, 56 secs 12 mins, 38 secs 11 mins, 21 secs
lgtm On 2017/03/17 15:31:02, nednguyen wrote: > On 2017/03/17 01:25:10, nednguyen wrote: > > On 2017/03/17 01:24:12, nednguyen wrote: > > > On 2017/03/16 16:10:26, nednguyen wrote: > > > > On 2017/03/16 15:45:27, jbudorick wrote: > > > > > On 2017/03/16 14:25:19, nednguyen wrote: > > > > > > On 2017/03/16 14:10:14, charliea wrote: > > > > > > > lgtm (although I'm not a tools/perf OWNER, you are) > > > > > > > > > > > > Ping Jam & John > > > > > > > > > > I kicked a few more ANSR builds. The cycle time on the first one looked > > > > > reasonable, though. > > > > > > > > Thanks! Please ping me again when you got the results from those builds. > > > > > > Ping John > > > > All the ANSR build are passing & taking ~12 minutes > > Ping John, I kicked off a few more ANSR builds. The run times of these 10 builds > are: > 10 mins, 54 secs > 10 mins, 51 secs > 11 mins, 32 secs > 11 mins, 28 secs > 11 mins, 20 secs > 12 mins, 2 secs > 11 mins, 30 secs > 12 mins, 56 secs > 12 mins, 38 secs > 11 mins, 21 secs Pings at 530 pm and 830 am the next morning? Patience :)
On 2017/03/17 16:01:08, jbudorick wrote: > lgtm > > On 2017/03/17 15:31:02, nednguyen wrote: > > On 2017/03/17 01:25:10, nednguyen wrote: > > > On 2017/03/17 01:24:12, nednguyen wrote: > > > > On 2017/03/16 16:10:26, nednguyen wrote: > > > > > On 2017/03/16 15:45:27, jbudorick wrote: > > > > > > On 2017/03/16 14:25:19, nednguyen wrote: > > > > > > > On 2017/03/16 14:10:14, charliea wrote: > > > > > > > > lgtm (although I'm not a tools/perf OWNER, you are) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ping Jam & John > > > > > > > > > > > > I kicked a few more ANSR builds. The cycle time on the first one > looked > > > > > > reasonable, though. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! Please ping me again when you got the results from those builds. > > > > > > > > Ping John > > > > > > All the ANSR build are passing & taking ~12 minutes > > > > Ping John, I kicked off a few more ANSR builds. The run times of these 10 > builds > > are: > > 10 mins, 54 secs > > 10 mins, 51 secs > > 11 mins, 32 secs > > 11 mins, 28 secs > > 11 mins, 20 secs > > 12 mins, 2 secs > > 11 mins, 30 secs > > 12 mins, 56 secs > > 12 mins, 38 secs > > 11 mins, 21 secs > > Pings at 530 pm and 830 am the next morning? Patience :) oops, sorry. Those were 830pm & 11:30am on my time zone :P
The CQ bit was checked by nednguyen@google.com
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
Try jobs failed on following builders: android_compile_dbg on master.tryserver.chromium.android (JOB_FAILED, https://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.android/builders/android_comp...)
The CQ bit was checked by nednguyen@google.com
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
CQ is committing da patch. Bot data: {"patchset_id": 1, "attempt_start_ts": 1489768199673950, "parent_rev": "01146e0cbc6cad00030611dd044ce199ab74e2e8", "commit_rev": "cae53638598092a3a97ad4fd6fbe5addd9404d9a"}
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Description was changed from ========== Prefetch all WPR archives used by system_health_smoke_test This also enables system_health_smoke_test on android.chromium bot (Android N5X Swarm Builder). BUG=700426 ========== to ========== Prefetch all WPR archives used by system_health_smoke_test This also enables system_health_smoke_test on android.chromium bot (Android N5X Swarm Builder). BUG=700426 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2752033002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#457813} Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/cae53638598092a3a97ad4fd6fbe... ==========
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Committed patchset #1 (id:1) as https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/cae53638598092a3a97ad4fd6fbe... |