|
|
Description[arm64][turbofan] Tst instructions can have a shifted operand.
This CL fixes a bug in the implementation of the code generation of
kArm64Tst32, where the shift input operand of kArm64Tst32 was ignored.
Please take a special look at the fix in kArm64Tst. I applied the fix
there as well, but because of differences in the instruction selector
I was not able to write a test for it.
R=v8-arm-ports@googlegroups.com
BUG=v8:6028
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2729853003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43555}
Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+/91cd0707698a7447f881dee2bd3a4c7bc27613a2
Patch Set 1 #Patch Set 2 : typo #
Messages
Total messages: 24 (15 generated)
The CQ bit was checked by ahaas@chromium.org to run a CQ dry run
Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
Dry run: Try jobs failed on following builders: v8_linux_arm_rel_ng on master.tryserver.v8 (JOB_FAILED, http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.v8/builders/v8_linux_arm_rel_ng/builds/...) v8_linux_arm_rel_ng_triggered on master.tryserver.v8 (JOB_FAILED, http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.v8/builders/v8_linux_arm_rel_ng_trigger...) v8_linux_nodcheck_rel_ng on master.tryserver.v8 (JOB_FAILED, http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.v8/builders/v8_linux_nodcheck_rel_ng/bu...) v8_linux_nodcheck_rel_ng_triggered on master.tryserver.v8 (JOB_FAILED, http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.v8/builders/v8_linux_nodcheck_rel_ng_tr...)
The CQ bit was checked by ahaas@chromium.org to run a CQ dry run
Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
Dry run: This issue passed the CQ dry run.
georgia.kouveli@arm.com changed reviewers: + georgia.kouveli@arm.com
lgtm
lgtm
The CQ bit was checked by ahaas@chromium.org
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
No L-G-T-M from a valid reviewer yet. CQ run can only be started by full committers or once the patch has received an L-G-T-M from a full committer. Even if an L-G-T-M may have been provided, it was from a non-committer, _not_ a full super star committer. Committers are members of the group "project-v8-committers". Note that this has nothing to do with OWNERS files.
ahaas@chromium.org changed reviewers: + titzer@chromium.org
On 2017/03/02 at 19:41:24, commit-bot wrote: > No L-G-T-M from a valid reviewer yet. > CQ run can only be started by full committers or once the patch has > received an L-G-T-M from a full committer. > Even if an L-G-T-M may have been provided, it was from a non-committer, > _not_ a full super star committer. > Committers are members of the group "project-v8-committers". > Note that this has nothing to do with OWNERS files. Ben, PTAL
On 2017/03/02 19:42:43, ahaas wrote: > On 2017/03/02 at 19:41:24, commit-bot wrote: > > No L-G-T-M from a valid reviewer yet. > > CQ run can only be started by full committers or once the patch has > > received an L-G-T-M from a full committer. > > Even if an L-G-T-M may have been provided, it was from a non-committer, > > _not_ a full super star committer. > > Committers are members of the group "project-v8-committers". > > Note that this has nothing to do with OWNERS files. > > Ben, PTAL lgtm
The CQ bit was checked by ahaas@chromium.org
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
CQ is committing da patch. Bot data: {"patchset_id": 20001, "attempt_start_ts": 1488483889722510, "parent_rev": "af55a29706703121f83837d0c9020649bb9ec6ce", "commit_rev": "91cd0707698a7447f881dee2bd3a4c7bc27613a2"}
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Description was changed from ========== [arm64][turbofan] Tst instructions can have a shifted operand. This CL fixes a bug in the implementation of the code generation of kArm64Tst32, where the shift input operand of kArm64Tst32 was ignored. Please take a special look at the fix in kArm64Tst. I applied the fix there as well, but because of differences in the instruction selector I was not able to write a test for it. R=v8-arm-ports@googlegroups.com BUG=v8:6028 ========== to ========== [arm64][turbofan] Tst instructions can have a shifted operand. This CL fixes a bug in the implementation of the code generation of kArm64Tst32, where the shift input operand of kArm64Tst32 was ignored. Please take a special look at the fix in kArm64Tst. I applied the fix there as well, but because of differences in the instruction selector I was not able to write a test for it. R=v8-arm-ports@googlegroups.com BUG=v8:6028 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2729853003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43555} Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+/91cd0707698a7447f881dee2bd3a4c7bc27... ==========
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Committed patchset #2 (id:20001) as https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+/91cd0707698a7447f881dee2bd3a4c7bc27... |