Index: LayoutTests/http/tests/serviceworker/registration.html |
diff --git a/LayoutTests/http/tests/serviceworker/registration.html b/LayoutTests/http/tests/serviceworker/registration.html |
new file mode 100644 |
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3fc71a4941b79feae7c980172504bcf2b7ae951f |
--- /dev/null |
+++ b/LayoutTests/http/tests/serviceworker/registration.html |
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ |
+<html> |
+<head> |
+<script src="/js-test-resources/js-test-pre.js"></script> |
+</head> |
+<body> |
+<script> |
+ description("Tests if ServiceWorker registration is working") |
+ |
+ function test_registerBasics() { |
michaeln
2013/10/24 23:26:55
I'd suggest we not add this particular positive te
|
+ debug("Registering normal pattern"); |
+ return navigator.registerServiceWorker("/*", "serviceworker.js").then( |
+ function(worker) { |
+ debug("ServiceWorker registered."); |
+ }); |
+ } |
+ function test_registerPatternOutsideDomain() { |
+ debug("Registering pattern outside domain"); |
+ return navigator.registerServiceWorker("http://foo.com/*", "serviceworker.js") |
+ .catch(function(e) { |
+ regError = e; |
+ shouldBe("'SecurityError'", "regError.name"); |
+ }); |
+ } |
+ function test_registerScriptOutsideDomain() { |
+ debug("Registering pattern outside domain"); |
+ return navigator.registerServiceWorker("/*", "http://foo.com/serviceworker.js") |
+ .catch(function(e) { |
+ regError = e; |
+ shouldBe("'SecurityError'", "regError.name"); |
+ }); |
+ } |
+ var jsTestIsAsync = true; |
+ test_registerBasics() |
+ .then(test_registerPatternOutsideDomain) |
+ .then(test_registerScriptOutsideDomain) |
+ .then(finishJSTest, function(e) { |
+ testFailed("Tests failed, exited with error:" + e.name + ": " + e.message); |
+ finishJSTest(); |
+ }); |
+</script> |
+<script src="/js-test-resources/js-test-post.js"></script> |
+</body> |
+</html> |