|
|
Chromium Code Reviews
DescriptionThis UMA was logged in ListUrlsActivity.java.
That file is deprecated so we lost that UMA.
Re-log it in WebUI.
BUG=697130
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2723633002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#454040}
Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/af14b80b50075629e1377736425000c609f7a4ac
Patch Set 1 #Patch Set 2 : format #
Total comments: 2
Patch Set 3 : fix tests #Messages
Total messages: 35 (21 generated)
Description was changed from ========== Add OnInitialDisplay Uma BUG= ========== to ========== Add Physical Web OnInitialDisplay Uma BUG= ==========
ranj@chromium.org changed reviewers: + cco3@chromium.org, mattreynolds@chromium.org
lgtm
lgtm, just add a bug number
The CQ bit was checked by ranj@chromium.org
The CQ bit was unchecked by ranj@chromium.org
Description was changed from ========== Add Physical Web OnInitialDisplay Uma BUG= ========== to ========== Add Physical Web OnInitialDisplay Uma BUG=697130 ==========
The CQ bit was checked by ranj@chromium.org
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
No L-G-T-M from a valid reviewer yet. CQ run can only be started by full committers or once the patch has received an L-G-T-M from a full committer. Even if an L-G-T-M may have been provided, it was from a non-committer, _not_ a full super star committer. Committers are members of the group "project-chromium-committers". Note that this has nothing to do with OWNERS files.
ranj@chromium.org changed reviewers: + nyquist@chromium.org
+nyquist
https://codereview.chromium.org/2723633002/diff/20001/components/physical_web... File components/physical_web/webui/physical_web_base_message_handler.cc (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/2723633002/diff/20001/components/physical_web... components/physical_web/webui/physical_web_base_message_handler.cc:60: UMA_HISTOGRAM_EXACT_LINEAR("PhysicalWeb.TotalUrls.OnInitialDisplay", This seems to also be reported from PhysicalWebUma.java. Is that intentional?
https://codereview.chromium.org/2723633002/diff/20001/components/physical_web... File components/physical_web/webui/physical_web_base_message_handler.cc (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/2723633002/diff/20001/components/physical_web... components/physical_web/webui/physical_web_base_message_handler.cc:60: UMA_HISTOGRAM_EXACT_LINEAR("PhysicalWeb.TotalUrls.OnInitialDisplay", On 2017/02/28 19:47:23, nyquist wrote: > This seems to also be reported from PhysicalWebUma.java. Is that intentional? Yes, this UMA in PhysicalWebUma.java was get called in "chrome/browser/physicalweb/ListUrlsActivity.java". This file is no longer used and so we should log it somewhere else. It reminders us to do a clean up.
OK. But can you then update the CL description. I find that most CL descriptions can be made helpful by writing one paragraph for each of these questions: - What happened before this CL? - Why is that bad? - How does this CL make it better? the code lgtm though
The CQ bit was checked by ranj@chromium.org
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
Try jobs failed on following builders: win_chromium_x64_rel_ng on master.tryserver.chromium.win (JOB_FAILED, http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.win/builders/win_chromium_x64_...)
The CQ bit was checked by ranj@chromium.org to run a CQ dry run
Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
Description was changed from ========== Add Physical Web OnInitialDisplay Uma BUG=697130 ========== to ========== This UMA was logged in ListUrlsActivity.java. That file is deprecated so we lost that UMA. Re-log it in WebUI BUG=697130 ==========
Description was changed from ========== This UMA was logged in ListUrlsActivity.java. That file is deprecated so we lost that UMA. Re-log it in WebUI BUG=697130 ========== to ========== This UMA was logged in ListUrlsActivity.java. That file is deprecated so we lost that UMA. Re-log it in WebUI BUG=697130 ==========
Description was changed from ========== This UMA was logged in ListUrlsActivity.java. That file is deprecated so we lost that UMA. Re-log it in WebUI BUG=697130 ========== to ========== This UMA was logged in ListUrlsActivity.java. That file is deprecated so we lost that UMA. Re-log it in WebUI. BUG=697130 ==========
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
Dry run: This issue passed the CQ dry run.
The CQ bit was checked by ranj@chromium.org
The patchset sent to the CQ was uploaded after l-g-t-m from nyquist@chromium.org, cco3@chromium.org, mattreynolds@chromium.org Link to the patchset: https://codereview.chromium.org/2723633002/#ps40001 (title: "fix tests")
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
CQ is committing da patch.
Bot data: {"patchset_id": 40001, "attempt_start_ts": 1488403014815870,
"parent_rev": "1ee8493dad2494e89b2417453c030da69f89137a", "commit_rev":
"af14b80b50075629e1377736425000c609f7a4ac"}
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Description was changed from ========== This UMA was logged in ListUrlsActivity.java. That file is deprecated so we lost that UMA. Re-log it in WebUI. BUG=697130 ========== to ========== This UMA was logged in ListUrlsActivity.java. That file is deprecated so we lost that UMA. Re-log it in WebUI. BUG=697130 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2723633002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#454040} Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/af14b80b50075629e13777364250... ==========
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Committed patchset #3 (id:40001) as https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/af14b80b50075629e13777364250...
Message was sent while issue was closed.
On 2017/03/01 21:30:59, commit-bot: I haz the power wrote: > Committed patchset #3 (id:40001) as > https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/af14b80b50075629e13777364250... Ran: for future reference, the very first line of description is a summary of the patch. Tommy's suggestion of the three questions is great for the body of the description, but the first line would be good to keep as a brief summary of the patch. |
