Revert of DirectCompositorFrameSink Uses CompositorFrameSinkSupport

Revert of DirectCompositorFrameSink Uses CompositorFrameSinkSupport (patchset #40 id:870001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2612083002/ )

Reason for revert:
This CL broke several perf tests on Windows.
(https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=696030)

Original issue's description:
> DirectCompositorFrameSink Uses CompositorFrameSinkSupport
> 
> CompositorFrameSinkSupport is the common service-side implementation of 
> CompositorFrameSink. In an effort to evaluate mojo performance 
> independently of refactoring existing code, CompositorFrameSinkSupport 
> provides the same public interface as MojoCompositorFrameSink but does 
> not depend on mojo.
> 
> This CL takes us in the direction of splitting DirectCompositorFrameSink 
> into two pieces: a client side component and a service side component.
> 
> BUG=673543
> CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel
> 
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2612083002
> Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#448731}
> Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/c405416053b99aa4d6f98f3126608c660773f6b4
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2612083002
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#451462}
> Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/9d4e3df6e621c6bd80dfaee7008b3e33d0c4fe79

TBR=reveman@chromium.org,danakj@chromium.org,fsamuel@chromium.org,jbauman@chromium.org,xlai@chromium.org,boliu@chromium.org
# Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed more than 1 days ago.
BUG=673543

[Alex Z., 2017-02-27 16:22:44]

The CQ bit was checked by staraz@chromium.org

[Alex Z., 2017-02-27 16:22:44]

Created Revert of DirectCompositorFrameSink Uses CompositorFrameSinkSupport

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-02-27 16:23:06]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 
https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-02-27 16:23:07]

The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-02-27 16:23:08]

No L-G-T-M from a valid reviewer yet. 
CQ run can only be started by full committers or once the patch has
received an L-G-T-M from a full committer.
Even if an L-G-T-M may have been provided, it was from a non-committer,
_not_ a full super star committer.
Committers are members of the group "project-chromium-committers".
Note that this has nothing to do with OWNERS files.

[Alex Z., 2017-02-27 16:28:34]

Please lgtm this CL so that the tests can stop breaking.

[boliu, 2017-02-27 16:30:14]

rs lgtm

[Fady Samuel, 2017-02-27 16:34:08]

On 2017/02/27 16:30:14, boliu wrote:
> rs lgtm

Wait, I'd like to understand what regressed first.

[Fady Samuel, 2017-02-27 16:34:09]

On 2017/02/27 16:30:14, boliu wrote:
> rs lgtm

Wait, I'd like to understand what regressed first.