Chromium Code Reviews| Index: chrome/android/BUILD.gn |
| diff --git a/chrome/android/BUILD.gn b/chrome/android/BUILD.gn |
| index 101078b8f8d8ad5eef68bd2309e1cfee4d14d5d4..febaf0ac2f49434e182d06dded147a24322ca77b 100644 |
| --- a/chrome/android/BUILD.gn |
| +++ b/chrome/android/BUILD.gn |
| @@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ android_library("chrome_java") { |
| # From java_sources.gni. |
| java_files = chrome_java_sources |
| - if (enable_vr_shell || enable_webvr) { |
| + if (enable_webvr) { |
|
bshe
2017/02/07 22:07:09
should we rename enable_webvr to enable_vr then? w
cjgrant
2017/02/07 22:16:54
That seems reasonable to me, but some buy-in from
amp
2017/02/07 22:50:07
+1 to renaming to a more general vr single flag (a
|
| java_files += chrome_vr_java_sources |
| deps += [ "//third_party/gvr-android-sdk:gvr_common_java" ] |
| } |
| @@ -461,7 +461,7 @@ android_library("chrome_test_vr_java") { |
| java_files = |
| [ "javatests/src/org/chromium/chrome/browser/vr_shell/VrUtils.java" ] |
| - if (enable_vr_shell) { |
| + if (enable_webvr) { |
|
bsheedy
2017/02/07 20:53:09
If we're throwing all the VR related things under
cjgrant
2017/02/07 22:16:54
Done.
|
| java_files += [ |
| "javatests/src/org/chromium/chrome/browser/vr_shell/MockVrDaydreamApi.java", |
| "javatests/src/org/chromium/chrome/browser/vr_shell/VrShellTest.java", |
| @@ -788,7 +788,7 @@ instrumentation_test_apk("chrome_public_test_apk") { |
| proguard_enabled = !is_java_debug |
| } |
| -if (enable_webvr || enable_vr_shell) { |
| +if (enable_webvr) { |
| instrumentation_test_apk("chrome_public_test_vr_apk") { |
| apk_name = "ChromePublicTestVr" |
| apk_under_test = ":chrome_public_apk" |