Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(1476)

Unified Diff: test/cctest/test-code-stub-assembler.cc

Issue 2677183002: [test] Make CHECK_EQ calls in cctest consistent. (Closed)
Patch Set: Cleanup order for test.x checks. Created 3 years, 10 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « test/cctest/test-code-layout.cc ('k') | test/cctest/test-debug.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: test/cctest/test-code-stub-assembler.cc
diff --git a/test/cctest/test-code-stub-assembler.cc b/test/cctest/test-code-stub-assembler.cc
index 2b14804c0391813b00ad11f799a173d00baf4567..e00b0c232a29064c738729ae926bf769bc08f038 100644
--- a/test/cctest/test-code-stub-assembler.cc
+++ b/test/cctest/test-code-stub-assembler.cc
@@ -1579,7 +1579,7 @@ TEST(IsDebugActive) {
CHECK(!code.is_null());
FunctionTester ft(code, kNumParams);
- CHECK_EQ(false, isolate->debug()->is_active());
+ CHECK(!isolate->debug()->is_active());
Handle<Object> result =
ft.Call(isolate->factory()->undefined_value()).ToHandleChecked();
CHECK_EQ(isolate->heap()->false_value(), *result);
« no previous file with comments | « test/cctest/test-code-layout.cc ('k') | test/cctest/test-debug.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698