|
|
Created:
3 years, 11 months ago by yhirano Modified:
3 years, 11 months ago Reviewers:
Łukasz Anforowicz CC:
chromium-reviews, blink-reviews, site-isolation-reviews_chromium.org Target Ref:
refs/pending/heads/master Project:
chromium Visibility:
Public. |
DescriptionReorganize virtual/mojo-loading test expectations w/site-per-process
Some of the failures are fixed and others are not mojo-loading specific.
BUG=670409, 670562, 610835, 678481, 678482, 678484, 678485, 678486, 678487, 678488, 678489, 678490, 678491, 678492, 678493, 678496, 678498, 678499
R=lukasza@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2618523004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#441886}
Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/8fb8af180ee4c2a3bdd6705aa91022ce0c18dc1c
Patch Set 1 #Patch Set 2 : fix #
Total comments: 1
Patch Set 3 : fix #Patch Set 4 : fix #Patch Set 5 : fix #Patch Set 6 : fix #
Messages
Total messages: 37 (31 generated)
The CQ bit was checked by yhirano@chromium.org to run a CQ dry run
Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
Description was changed from ========== Reorganize virtual/mojo-loading failure expectations w/site-per-process Some of the failures are fixed and others are not mojo-loading specific. BUG=670409, 610835, 670496, 678481, 678482, 678484, 678485, 678486, 678487, 678488, 678489, 678490, 678491, 678492, 678493, 678496, 678498, 678499 R=lukasza@chromium.org ========== to ========== Reorganize virtual/mojo-loading failure expectations w/site-per-process Some of the failures are fixed and others are not mojo-loading specific. BUG=670409, 610835, 678481, 678482, 678484, 678485, 678486, 678487, 678488, 678489, 678490, 678491, 678492, 678493, 678496, 678498, 678499 R=lukasza@chromium.org ==========
yhirano@chromium.org changed reviewers: - lukasza@chromium.org
yhirano@chromium.org changed reviewers: + lukasza@chromium.org
The CQ bit was checked by yhirano@chromium.org to run a CQ dry run
Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
Description was changed from ========== Reorganize virtual/mojo-loading failure expectations w/site-per-process Some of the failures are fixed and others are not mojo-loading specific. BUG=670409, 610835, 678481, 678482, 678484, 678485, 678486, 678487, 678488, 678489, 678490, 678491, 678492, 678493, 678496, 678498, 678499 R=lukasza@chromium.org ========== to ========== Reorganize virtual/mojo-loading failure expectations w/site-per-process Some of the failures are fixed and others are not mojo-loading specific. BUG=670409, 670562, 610835, 678481, 678482, 678484, 678485, 678486, 678487, 678488, 678489, 678490, 678491, 678492, 678493, 678496, 678498, 678499 R=lukasza@chromium.org ==========
lukasza@, can you take a look? I copied expectation entries between two files because you said FlagExpectations/site-per-process doesn't inherit TestExpectation. Is my understanding correct?
Description was changed from ========== Reorganize virtual/mojo-loading failure expectations w/site-per-process Some of the failures are fixed and others are not mojo-loading specific. BUG=670409, 670562, 610835, 678481, 678482, 678484, 678485, 678486, 678487, 678488, 678489, 678490, 678491, 678492, 678493, 678496, 678498, 678499 R=lukasza@chromium.org ========== to ========== Reorganize virtual/mojo-loading test expectations w/site-per-process Some of the failures are fixed and others are not mojo-loading specific. BUG=670409, 670562, 610835, 678481, 678482, 678484, 678485, 678486, 678487, 678488, 678489, 678490, 678491, 678492, 678493, 678496, 678498, 678499 R=lukasza@chromium.org ==========
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
Dry run: This issue passed the CQ dry run.
+site-isolation-reviews@ LGTM with one suggestion. https://codereview.chromium.org/2618523004/diff/20001/third_party/WebKit/Layo... File third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/FlagExpectations/site-per-process (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/2618523004/diff/20001/third_party/WebKit/Layo... third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/FlagExpectations/site-per-process:179: crbug.com/678499 virtual/mojo-loading/http/tests/security/contentSecurityPolicy/require-sri-for/require-sri-for-script-preload-allowed.php [ Failure Pass ] Thank you very much for triaging these. Could you please split these test expectations into 2 sections - one for site-isolation-specific failures and another one for generic flakiness (with one-line comments describing which section is which one)? For example - looking at the bugs I see that http/tests/inspector/resource-tree/resource-tree-reload.html is flaky overall, but http/tests/inspector/appcache/appcache-iframe-manifests.html is only flaky on site isolation bots.
The CQ bit was checked by yhirano@chromium.org to run a CQ dry run
Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
Dry run: Try jobs failed on following builders: chromium_presubmit on master.tryserver.chromium.linux (JOB_FAILED, http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.linux/builders/chromium_presub...)
The CQ bit was checked by yhirano@chromium.org to run a CQ dry run
Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
Dry run: Try jobs failed on following builders: ios-device on master.tryserver.chromium.mac (JOB_FAILED, http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.mac/builders/ios-device/builds...) ios-device-xcode-clang on master.tryserver.chromium.mac (JOB_FAILED, http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.mac/builders/ios-device-xcode-...) ios-simulator on master.tryserver.chromium.mac (JOB_FAILED, http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.mac/builders/ios-simulator/bui...) ios-simulator-xcode-clang on master.tryserver.chromium.mac (JOB_FAILED, http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.mac/builders/ios-simulator-xco...)
The CQ bit was checked by yhirano@chromium.org to run a CQ dry run
Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
Dry run: Try jobs failed on following builders: ios-device on master.tryserver.chromium.mac (JOB_FAILED, http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.mac/builders/ios-device/builds...) ios-device-xcode-clang on master.tryserver.chromium.mac (JOB_FAILED, http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.mac/builders/ios-device-xcode-...) ios-simulator on master.tryserver.chromium.mac (JOB_FAILED, http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.mac/builders/ios-simulator/bui...) ios-simulator-xcode-clang on master.tryserver.chromium.mac (JOB_FAILED, http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.mac/builders/ios-simulator-xco...)
The CQ bit was checked by yhirano@chromium.org to run a CQ dry run
Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
On 2017/01/05 17:11:45, Łukasz Anforowicz wrote: > +site-isolation-reviews@ > > LGTM with one suggestion. > > https://codereview.chromium.org/2618523004/diff/20001/third_party/WebKit/Layo... > File third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/FlagExpectations/site-per-process (right): > > https://codereview.chromium.org/2618523004/diff/20001/third_party/WebKit/Layo... > third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/FlagExpectations/site-per-process:179: > crbug.com/678499 > virtual/mojo-loading/http/tests/security/contentSecurityPolicy/require-sri-for/require-sri-for-script-preload-allowed.php > [ Failure Pass ] > Thank you very much for triaging these. Could you please split these test > expectations into 2 sections - one for site-isolation-specific failures and > another one for generic flakiness (with one-line comments describing which > section is which one)? For example - looking at the bugs I see that > http/tests/inspector/resource-tree/resource-tree-reload.html is flaky overall, > but http/tests/inspector/appcache/appcache-iframe-manifests.html is only flaky > on site isolation bots. Thanks! As FlagExpectations/site-per-process does seem inherit TestExpectations, I removed entries listed in TestExpectations and leave entries listed in SlowTests.
The CQ bit was unchecked by yhirano@chromium.org
The CQ bit was checked by yhirano@chromium.org
The patchset sent to the CQ was uploaded after l-g-t-m from lukasza@chromium.org Link to the patchset: https://codereview.chromium.org/2618523004/#ps100001 (title: "fix")
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
The CQ bit was checked by yhirano@chromium.org
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
CQ is committing da patch. Bot data: {"patchset_id": 100001, "attempt_start_ts": 1483680076283480, "parent_rev": "41d8555158262926a0971b6f40da9988f80e6c55", "commit_rev": "8fb8af180ee4c2a3bdd6705aa91022ce0c18dc1c"}
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Description was changed from ========== Reorganize virtual/mojo-loading test expectations w/site-per-process Some of the failures are fixed and others are not mojo-loading specific. BUG=670409, 670562, 610835, 678481, 678482, 678484, 678485, 678486, 678487, 678488, 678489, 678490, 678491, 678492, 678493, 678496, 678498, 678499 R=lukasza@chromium.org ========== to ========== Reorganize virtual/mojo-loading test expectations w/site-per-process Some of the failures are fixed and others are not mojo-loading specific. BUG=670409, 670562, 610835, 678481, 678482, 678484, 678485, 678486, 678487, 678488, 678489, 678490, 678491, 678492, 678493, 678496, 678498, 678499 R=lukasza@chromium.org Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2618523004 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#441886} Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/8fb8af180ee4c2a3bdd6705aa910... ==========
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Committed patchset #6 (id:100001) as https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/8fb8af180ee4c2a3bdd6705aa910... |