Build cast_unittest

Build cast_unittest

Build cast targets on all bots.

R=justinlin@chromium.org

Committed: https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=226914

[justinlin, 2013-10-03 20:55:14]

lgtm

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2013-10-03 20:59:13]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
https://chromium-status.appspot.com/cq/hclam@chromium.org/25891004/1

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2013-10-03 21:04:21]

Step "update" is always a major failure.
Look at the try server FAQ for more details.
http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium/buildstatus?builder=linux_rel&...

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2013-10-03 22:04:40]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
https://chromium-status.appspot.com/cq/hclam@chromium.org/25891004/1

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2013-10-03 23:56:07]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
https://chromium-status.appspot.com/cq/hclam@chromium.org/25891004/1

[Alpha Left Google, 2013-10-04 00:57:48]

Committed patchset #1 manually as r226914 (presubmit successful).

[tapted, 2013-10-04 04:45:14]

On 2013/10/04 00:57:48, Alpha wrote:
> Committed patchset #1 manually as r226914 (presubmit successful).

Reverted in r226960 (sorry!). This seems to be the cause of CQ failures for
others: E.g.

http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium/builders/mac/builds/90601/step...
http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium/builders/win_x64_rel/builds/42...

Revert CL is https://codereview.chromium.org/25368003

[Alpha Left Google, 2013-10-04 17:17:20]

On 2013/10/04 04:45:14, tapted wrote:
> On 2013/10/04 00:57:48, Alpha wrote:
> > Committed patchset #1 manually as r226914 (presubmit successful).
> 
> Reverted in r226960 (sorry!). This seems to be the cause of CQ failures for
> others: E.g.
> 
>
http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium/builders/mac/builds/90601/step...
>
http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium/builders/win_x64_rel/builds/42...
> 
> Revert CL is https://codereview.chromium.org/25368003

This is unfortunate, how come the same change went through compilation on CQ and
then it failed in a later pass!? In particularly the code hasn't changed at all
but it compiled fine yesterday and not today, what went wrong?

[tapted, 2013-10-08 05:45:59]

On 2013/10/04 17:17:20, Alpha wrote:
> On 2013/10/04 04:45:14, tapted wrote:
> > On 2013/10/04 00:57:48, Alpha wrote:
> > > Committed patchset #1 manually as r226914 (presubmit successful).
> > 
> > Reverted in r226960 (sorry!). This seems to be the cause of CQ failures for
> > others: E.g.
> > 
> >
>
http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium/builders/mac/builds/90601/step...
> >
>
http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium/builders/win_x64_rel/builds/42...
> > 
> > Revert CL is https://codereview.chromium.org/25368003
> 
> This is unfortunate, how come the same change went through compilation on CQ
and
> then it failed in a later pass!? In particularly the code hasn't changed at
all
> but it compiled fine yesterday and not today, what went wrong?

Comparing outputs... the jobs here compiled fewer files. E.g.

ninja -C /Volumes/data/b/build/slave/mac/build/src/out/Debug
chromium_builder_tests All -j50
ninja: Entering directory `/Volumes/data/b/build/slave/mac/build/src/out/Debug'
[1/9865] CC
obj/native_client/src/trusted/service_runtime/arch/x86_32/service_runtime_x86_32.nacl_app_32.o

vs

ninja -C /Volumes/data/b/build/slave/mac/build/src/out/Debug
chromium_builder_tests All -j50
ninja: Entering directory `/Volumes/data/b/build/slave/mac/build/src/out/Debug'
[1/20055] CXX
obj/third_party/webrtc/system_wrappers/source/system_wrappers.atomic32_mac.o


Perhaps try running jobs via `git cl try --clobber` before hitting up the CQ.

However, this might also point to a missing dependency in gyp, which could
become a problem later..