Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(131)

Issue 2493863002: [Cronet] Ignore Certificate Transparency to avoid CT log expiration. (Closed)

Created:
4 years, 1 month ago by mef
Modified:
4 years, 1 month ago
Reviewers:
Ryan Sleevi
CC:
chromium-reviews, cbentzel+watch_chromium.org
Target Ref:
refs/pending/heads/master
Project:
chromium
Visibility:
Public.

Description

[Cronet] Ignore Certificate Transparency to avoid CT log expiration. BUG=663883

Patch Set 1 #

Patch Set 2 : Use IgnoresCTVerifier / PolicyEnforcer on iOS. #

Total comments: 1
Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+121 lines, -12 lines) Patch
M components/cronet/android/BUILD.gn View 1 chunk +2 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M components/cronet/android/cronet_url_request_context_adapter.cc View 2 chunks +6 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
A components/cronet/ct_ignores.h View 1 1 chunk +55 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
A components/cronet/ct_ignores.cc View 1 chunk +38 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M components/cronet/ios/BUILD.gn View 1 1 chunk +2 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M components/cronet/ios/cronet_environment.cc View 1 3 chunks +3 lines, -11 lines 1 comment Download
M net/url_request/url_request_context_builder.h View 3 chunks +5 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M net/url_request/url_request_context_builder.cc View 2 chunks +10 lines, -1 line 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 8 (2 generated)
mef
Hi Ryan, PTAL. Does it make sense? What's a good way to test this? If ...
4 years, 1 month ago (2016-11-10 20:55:43 UTC) #3
Ryan Sleevi
Before I get too far into reviewing this - does https://codereview.chromium.org/2495583002/ work?
4 years, 1 month ago (2016-11-10 20:59:26 UTC) #4
Ryan Sleevi
On 2016/11/10 20:55:43, mef wrote: > Does it make sense? > What's a good way ...
4 years, 1 month ago (2016-11-10 20:59:57 UTC) #5
mef
On 2016/11/10 20:59:26, Ryan Sleevi wrote: > Before I get too far into reviewing this ...
4 years, 1 month ago (2016-11-10 21:04:47 UTC) #6
mef
On 2016/11/10 20:59:57, Ryan Sleevi wrote: > On 2016/11/10 20:55:43, mef wrote: > > Does ...
4 years, 1 month ago (2016-11-10 21:06:09 UTC) #7
Ryan Sleevi
4 years, 1 month ago (2016-11-14 05:16:57 UTC) #8
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Closing this out now that the timebomb has been defanged.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698