Chromium Code Reviews| Index: content/browser/renderer_host/offscreen_canvas_compositor_frame_sink.cc |
| diff --git a/content/browser/renderer_host/offscreen_canvas_compositor_frame_sink.cc b/content/browser/renderer_host/offscreen_canvas_compositor_frame_sink.cc |
| index 0c4d066e37895a768142f2491c6e6b1d489ce988..fbd8f8c54e0505a2c0749d3ba0bc0174215aed81 100644 |
| --- a/content/browser/renderer_host/offscreen_canvas_compositor_frame_sink.cc |
| +++ b/content/browser/renderer_host/offscreen_canvas_compositor_frame_sink.cc |
| @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ |
| #include "cc/surfaces/surface.h" |
| #include "cc/surfaces/surface_manager.h" |
| #include "content/browser/compositor/surface_utils.h" |
| +#include "content/browser/renderer_host/offscreen_canvas_surface_manager.h" |
| #include "mojo/public/cpp/bindings/strong_binding.h" |
| namespace content { |
| @@ -14,12 +15,15 @@ namespace content { |
| OffscreenCanvasCompositorFrameSink::OffscreenCanvasCompositorFrameSink( |
| const cc::SurfaceId& surface_id, |
| cc::mojom::MojoCompositorFrameSinkClientPtr client) |
| - : surface_id_(surface_id), client_(std::move(client)) { |
| + : surface_id_(surface_id), client_(std::move(client)), weak_factory_(this) { |
| cc::SurfaceManager* manager = GetSurfaceManager(); |
| surface_factory_ = base::MakeUnique<cc::SurfaceFactory>( |
| surface_id_.frame_sink_id(), manager, this); |
| manager->RegisterFrameSinkId(surface_id_.frame_sink_id()); |
| surface_factory_->Create(surface_id_.local_frame_id()); |
| + |
| + DCHECK(OffscreenCanvasSurfaceManager::GetInstance()->GetSurfaceInstance( |
|
Fady Samuel
2016/11/14 21:15:40
Can we get rid of this?
xlai (Olivia)
2016/11/15 17:16:18
Done.
|
| + surface_id_.frame_sink_id())); |
|
dcheng
2016/11/15 07:28:29
Do we need to check somewhere higher in the stack
xlai (Olivia)
2016/11/15 17:16:18
I'm removing it now. I think this DCHECK is better
|
| } |
| OffscreenCanvasCompositorFrameSink::~OffscreenCanvasCompositorFrameSink() { |