Fix test failure expectations and update status files.

tests/language/bad_constructor_test.dart

 // Copyright (c) 2012, the Dart project authors.  Please see the AUTHORS file
 // for details. All rights reserved. Use of this source code is governed by a
 // BSD-style license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
 // VMOptions=--constructor_name_check
 
 class A {
   // Constructor may not be static.
-  static A();  /// 00: compile-time error
+  static A() { }  /// 00: compile-time error

[Ivan Posva, 2013/09/26 20:58:53]

Shouldn't

class A {
  static A();
}

also be an error?

[regis, 2013/09/26 22:12:26]

Yes, it is the same. I just find the syntax with the semicolon harder to read.
Reverted here and at other places.

 
   // Factory may not be static.
   static factory A() { return null; }  /// 01: compile-time error
 
   // Named constructor may not conflict with names of methods and fields.
   var m;
   A.m() { m = 0; }  /// 04: compile-time error
 
-  set q(var value) { m = q; }
-  A.q();   /// 05: compile-time error
+  set q(var value) { m = q; }  // No name conflict with q=.
+  A.q() { }   /// 05: runtime error

[Ivan Posva, 2013/09/26 20:58:53]

In what circumstance do we get a runtime error here and why? Please add a
comment to that effect.

[regis, 2013/09/26 22:12:26]

main calls new A() instead of new A.q().
Comment added.
BTW, I missed a failure in Dart2js here. Bug filed and status updated. 

 
-  A.foo() : m = 0;  /// 06: compile-time error
+  A.foo() : m = 0 { }  /// 06: compile-time error
   int foo(int a, int b) => a + b * m;
 }
 
 main() {
   new A();
 }