List removed (non-whitelisted) resources when repacking.

List removed (non-whitelisted) resources when repacking.

R=newt@chromium.org

Committed: https://code.google.com/p/grit-i18n/source/detail?r=167

[newt (away), 2014-04-22 17:53:15]

Code looks good. What's the reason for landing this?

[Lei Zhang, 2014-04-22 18:15:43]

On 2014/04/22 17:53:15, newt wrote:
> Code looks good. What's the reason for landing this?

I mentioned this CL in
https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=338759#c76

Currently, we do:

1) enable white list generation and make a whitelist
2) apply the whitelist and repack

This CL allows step 2 to generate an unused resources list. We can use that list
to:

3) help sanity check the whitelist
4) find cruft to remove or tag as platform specific - e.g.
https://codereview.chromium.org/246683004/

[newt (away), 2014-04-22 18:25:21]

Gotcha. lgtm if we're OK with the additional build spew.

[Lei Zhang, 2014-04-22 19:03:28]

On 2014/04/22 18:25:21, newt wrote:
> Gotcha. lgtm if we're OK with the additional build spew.

It only happens during repacking, which isn't common. Can I land this or do I
need a grit-i18n proj owner?

[newt (away), 2014-04-22 19:11:13]

On 2014/04/22 19:03:28, Lei Zhang wrote:
> On 2014/04/22 18:25:21, newt wrote:
> > Gotcha. lgtm if we're OK with the additional build spew.
> 
> It only happens during repacking, which isn't common. Can I land this or do I
> need a grit-i18n proj owner?

I can land it, if you're not listed as a committer for grit-i18n.

[Lei Zhang, 2014-04-22 19:18:53]

On 2014/04/22 19:11:13, newt wrote:
> On 2014/04/22 19:03:28, Lei Zhang wrote:
> > On 2014/04/22 18:25:21, newt wrote:
> > > Gotcha. lgtm if we're OK with the additional build spew.
> > 
> > It only happens during repacking, which isn't common. Can I land this or do
I
> > need a grit-i18n proj owner?
> 
> I can land it, if you're not listed as a committer for grit-i18n.

I am not.

[newt (away), 2014-04-22 20:54:53]

Committed patchset #1 manually as r167 (presubmit successful).