FYI: The redness stopped after this revert. Is it a problem getting a canary with ...
4 years, 2 months ago
(2016-10-14 09:52:48 UTC)
#8
Message was sent while issue was closed.
FYI: The redness stopped after this revert. Is it a problem getting a canary
with this commit in?
@hablich: Can you check if we rolled in the range where this CL was in?
Michael Hablich
On 2016/10/14 09:52:48, machenbach (slow) wrote: > FYI: The redness stopped after this revert. Is ...
4 years, 2 months ago
(2016-10-14 09:59:26 UTC)
#9
Message was sent while issue was closed.
On 2016/10/14 09:52:48, machenbach (slow) wrote:
> FYI: The redness stopped after this revert. Is it a problem getting a canary
> with this commit in?
>
> @hablich: Can you check if we rolled in the range where this CL was in?
This CL is deployed on Canary 2890 in v8
https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+log/ec798714..24369beb.
Yang
On 2016/10/14 09:59:26, Hablich wrote: > On 2016/10/14 09:52:48, machenbach (slow) wrote: > > FYI: ...
4 years, 2 months ago
(2016-10-14 11:36:08 UTC)
#10
Message was sent while issue was closed.
On 2016/10/14 09:59:26, Hablich wrote:
> On 2016/10/14 09:52:48, machenbach (slow) wrote:
> > FYI: The redness stopped after this revert. Is it a problem getting a canary
> > with this commit in?
> >
> > @hablich: Can you check if we rolled in the range where this CL was in?
>
> This CL is deployed on Canary 2890 in v8
> https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+log/ec798714..24369beb.
Note: this revert seems to have fixed the flaky test failures.
Issue 2418053002: Revert of [heap] Move slot filtering logic into sweeper.
(Closed)
Created 4 years, 2 months ago by Michael Achenbach
Modified 4 years, 2 months ago
Reviewers: ulan, Michael Lippautz, Hannes Payer (out of office)
Base URL:
Comments: 0