Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(291)

Unified Diff: src/ast/scopes.cc

Issue 2411873004: [ignition] Eliminate hole checks where statically possible for loads and stores (Closed)
Patch Set: Move logic to scope analysis time Created 4 years, 2 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: src/ast/scopes.cc
diff --git a/src/ast/scopes.cc b/src/ast/scopes.cc
index d9f34c894238ce934848e3636e7a361e0b602208..679aff5796a6e73943cde9c7ec08c28925abc20b 100644
--- a/src/ast/scopes.cc
+++ b/src/ast/scopes.cc
@@ -1611,6 +1611,51 @@ void Scope::ResolveVariable(ParseInfo* info, VariableProxy* proxy) {
}
}
+namespace {
+
+bool AccessNeedsHoleCheck(Variable* var, VariableProxy* proxy, Scope* scope) {
+ if (!var->binding_needs_init()) {
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ DCHECK(var->scope() != NULL);
+
+ if (var->is_this()) {
+ DCHECK(
+ IsSubclassConstructor(scope->GetDeclarationScope()->function_kind()));
+ // TODO(littledan): implement 'this' hole check elimination.
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ // We should always have valid source positions.
+ DCHECK(var->initializer_position() != kNoSourcePosition);
+ DCHECK(proxy->position() != kNoSourcePosition);
+
+ // Check if the binding really needs an initialization check. The check
+ // can be skipped in the following situation: we have a LET or CONST
+ // binding, both the Variable and the VariableProxy have the same
+ // declaration scope (i.e. they are both in global code, in the
+ // same function or in the same eval code), the VariableProxy is in
+ // the source physically located after the initializer of the variable,
+ // and that the initializer cannot be skipped due to a nonlinear scope.
+ //
+ // The condition on the declaration scopes is a conservative check for
+ // nested functions that access a binding and are called before the
+ // binding is initialized:
+ // function() { f(); let x = 1; function f() { x = 2; } }
+ //
+ // The check cannot be skipped on non-linear scopes, namely switch
+ // scopes, to ensure tests are done in cases like the following:
+ // switch (1) { case 0: let x = 2; case 1: f(x); }
+ // The scope of the variable needs to be checked, in case the use is
+ // in a sub-block which may be linear.
+ return var->scope()->GetDeclarationScope() != scope->GetDeclarationScope() ||
+ var->scope()->is_nonlinear() ||
+ var->initializer_position() >= proxy->position();
+}
+
+} // anonymous namespace
+
void Scope::ResolveTo(ParseInfo* info, VariableProxy* proxy, Variable* var) {
#ifdef DEBUG
if (info->script_is_native()) {
@@ -1635,6 +1680,7 @@ void Scope::ResolveTo(ParseInfo* info, VariableProxy* proxy, Variable* var) {
DCHECK_NOT_NULL(var);
if (proxy->is_assigned()) var->set_maybe_assigned();
+ if (AccessNeedsHoleCheck(var, proxy, this)) proxy->set_needs_hole_check();
proxy->BindTo(var);
}

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698