Index: src/objects.cc |
diff --git a/src/objects.cc b/src/objects.cc |
index f852ca0de39dee015d82e03b5f7f326910688c56..e2413a05c072630d7d74fdb754c9f70fd61a0ea2 100644 |
--- a/src/objects.cc |
+++ b/src/objects.cc |
@@ -1325,6 +1325,11 @@ MaybeHandle<Object> Object::GetPropertyWithAccessor(LookupIterator* it) { |
// const declaration would conflict with the getter. |
DCHECK(!structure->IsForeign()); |
+ // Accessor with 'cached' private property. |
+ if (it->TryLookupCacheProperty()) { |
+ return Object::GetProperty(it); |
Toon Verwaest
2016/10/21 08:22:14
Why not do GetProperty directly in TryLookupCached
vogelheim
2016/11/03 16:12:24
Hmm. That would seem to do the wrong thing for the
|
+ } |
+ |
// API style callbacks. |
if (structure->IsAccessorInfo()) { |
Handle<JSObject> holder = it->GetHolder<JSObject>(); |
@@ -20218,5 +20223,19 @@ Handle<JSModuleNamespace> Module::GetModuleNamespace(Handle<Module> module) { |
return ns; |
} |
+MaybeHandle<Name> FunctionTemplateInfo::TryGetCachePropertyName( |
+ Isolate* isolate, Handle<Object> getter) { |
+ if (getter->IsFunctionTemplateInfo()) { |
Toon Verwaest
2016/10/21 08:22:14
It should be easy to support JSFunctions backed by
vogelheim
2016/11/03 16:12:24
Do we have a use case for that?
(I'm generally fo
|
+ Handle<FunctionTemplateInfo> fti = |
+ Handle<FunctionTemplateInfo>::cast(getter); |
+ // Check if the accessor is backed by a private property (cached accessor). |
+ if (!fti->cache_property()->IsTheHole(isolate)) { |
+ Handle<Name> name = handle(Name::cast(fti->cache_property())); |
+ return MaybeHandle<Name>(name); |
+ } |
+ } |
+ return MaybeHandle<Name>(); |
+} |
+ |
} // namespace internal |
} // namespace v8 |