Index: src/lookup.cc |
diff --git a/src/lookup.cc b/src/lookup.cc |
index 3921e1657c8511b5de5a1d96b6f802ae1649bbf0..51d02990298c3a5fc55fa1984f2e039d053f21c3 100644 |
--- a/src/lookup.cc |
+++ b/src/lookup.cc |
@@ -835,5 +835,24 @@ Handle<InterceptorInfo> LookupIterator::GetInterceptorForFailedAccessCheck() |
return Handle<InterceptorInfo>(); |
} |
+bool LookupIterator::TryLookupCacheProperty() { |
+ if (state() != LookupIterator::ACCESSOR) return false; |
+ |
+ Handle<Object> accessors = GetAccessors(); |
+ if (!accessors->IsAccessorPair()) return false; |
Toon Verwaest
2016/10/21 08:22:14
You should be able to make this a DCHECK and only
vogelheim
2016/11/03 16:12:24
Mostly done.
There's now a LookupCachedProperty,
|
+ |
+ Handle<Object> getter(Handle<AccessorPair>::cast(accessors)->getter(), |
+ isolate()); |
Toon Verwaest
2016/10/21 08:22:14
you don't need isolate() here
vogelheim
2016/11/03 16:12:23
The compiler disagrees. With only one param, this
Toon Verwaest
2016/11/04 10:19:52
You're right; I misread I guess. Object includes S
|
+ MaybeHandle<Name> maybe_name = |
+ FunctionTemplateInfo::TryGetCachePropertyName(isolate(), getter); |
+ if (maybe_name.is_null()) return false; |
+ |
+ // We have found a cached property! Modify the iterator accordingly. |
+ name_ = maybe_name.ToHandleChecked(); |
+ Restart(); |
+ CHECK_EQ(state(), LookupIterator::DATA); |
+ return true; |
+} |
+ |
} // namespace internal |
} // namespace v8 |