Chromium Code Reviews| Index: third_party/WebKit/Source/modules/webgl/WebGLFramebuffer.cpp |
| diff --git a/third_party/WebKit/Source/modules/webgl/WebGLFramebuffer.cpp b/third_party/WebKit/Source/modules/webgl/WebGLFramebuffer.cpp |
| index 06e3fdf3f54c49b07ef2904622f26b48ec0c26af..9dbf9903e8343c071c805c320d85f6cce7ec86d8 100644 |
| --- a/third_party/WebKit/Source/modules/webgl/WebGLFramebuffer.cpp |
| +++ b/third_party/WebKit/Source/modules/webgl/WebGLFramebuffer.cpp |
| @@ -545,4 +545,11 @@ DEFINE_TRACE(WebGLFramebuffer) { |
| WebGLContextObject::trace(visitor); |
| } |
| +DEFINE_TRACE_WRAPPERS(WebGLFramebuffer) { |
| + for (const auto& attachment : m_attachments) { |
| + visitor->traceWrappers(attachment.value->object()); |
|
Michael Lippautz
2016/10/06 17:54:54
I mirrored the object grouping behavior here by di
Ken Russell (switch to Gerrit)
2016/10/06 19:05:14
There's no JavaScript wrapper for it, so that's no
Michael Lippautz
2016/10/06 19:58:13
Yep, it's not necessary.
I guess my question is
Ken Russell (switch to Gerrit)
2016/10/07 03:00:55
Let's just mirror what object grouping did -- i.e.
haraken
2016/10/07 04:48:49
We've already added a bunch of traceWrappers to no
Ken Russell (switch to Gerrit)
2016/10/07 04:58:52
OK. I don't have a strong opinion on this.
|
| + } |
| + WebGLContextObject::traceWrappers(visitor); |
| +} |
| + |
| } // namespace blink |