thread isolate for files starting with 'b' and 'c'

thread isolate for files starting with 'b' and 'c'

R=svenpanne@chromium.org
BUG=

Committed: https://code.google.com/p/v8/source/detail?r=16489

[Sven Panne, 2013-09-02 12:40:51]

https://codereview.chromium.org/23729006/diff/1/src/code-stubs.cc
File src/code-stubs.cc (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/23729006/diff/1/src/code-stubs.cc#newcode49
src/code-stubs.cc:49: miss_handler_(),
Is this change intentional? I can't easily see why it's correct/needed...

https://codereview.chromium.org/23729006/diff/1/src/code-stubs.h
File src/code-stubs.h (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/23729006/diff/1/src/code-stubs.h#newcode280
src/code-stubs.h:280: explicit CodeStubInterfaceDescriptor();
Huh?

[dcarney, 2013-09-02 12:47:00]

https://codereview.chromium.org/23729006/diff/1/src/code-stubs.cc
File src/code-stubs.cc (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/23729006/diff/1/src/code-stubs.cc#newcode49
src/code-stubs.cc:49: miss_handler_(),
On 2013/09/02 12:40:52, Sven Panne wrote:
> Is this change intentional? I can't easily see why it's correct/needed...

yes, intentional. all accesses to miss_handler are checked to ensure they were
set in the first place, so NULL here is okay

https://codereview.chromium.org/23729006/diff/1/src/code-stubs.h
File src/code-stubs.h (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/23729006/diff/1/src/code-stubs.h#newcode280
src/code-stubs.h:280: explicit CodeStubInterfaceDescriptor();
On 2013/09/02 12:40:52, Sven Panne wrote:
> Huh?

will fix

[Sven Panne, 2013-09-02 14:25:31]

lgtm

[dcarney, 2013-09-03 06:57:39]

Committed patchset #2 manually as r16489 (presubmit successful).