Revert of My take on SkAlign changes.

Revert of My take on SkAlign changes. (patchset #3 id:40001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2368293002/ )

Reason for revert:
Let's see if reverting this helps the roll.

Original issue's description:
> My take on SkAlign changes.
> 
> Like the other change, it makes SkAlignN(x) macros work for pointers, and makes the macros themselves just syntax sugar for SkAlign<N>(x).  We can still decide if we want to sed away the macros independently.
> 
> This just does it in a somewhat less repetitive way, and adds some tests.
> 
> BUG=skia:
> GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search?issue=2368293002
> 
> No public API changes.
> TBR=reed@google.com
> 
> Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/e1a5f4e292384046678edc5c1e360b3e13dc118c

TBR=cblume@chromium.org,mtklein@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=skia:

Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/6a259bfcc80a7b4765b99c7503e5a5b98b7e1523

[mtklein, 2016-09-27 01:20:49]

The CQ bit was checked by mtklein@google.com

[mtklein, 2016-09-27 01:20:49]

Created Revert of My take on SkAlign changes.

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-09-27 01:20:53]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 
https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-09-27 01:20:59]

Description was changed from

==========
Revert of My take on SkAlign changes. (patchset #3 id:40001 of
https://codereview.chromium.org/2368293002/ )

Reason for revert:
Let's see if reverting this helps the roll.

Original issue's description:
> My take on SkAlign changes.
> 
> Like the other change, it makes SkAlignN(x) macros work for pointers, and
makes the macros themselves just syntax sugar for SkAlign<N>(x).  We can still
decide if we want to sed away the macros independently.
> 
> This just does it in a somewhat less repetitive way, and adds some tests.
> 
> BUG=skia:
> GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search?issue=2368293002
> 
> No public API changes.
> TBR=reed@google.com
> 
> Committed:
https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/e1a5f4e292384046678edc5c1e360b3e13dc118c

TBR=cblume@chromium.org,mtklein@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=skia:
==========

to

==========
Revert of My take on SkAlign changes. (patchset #3 id:40001 of
https://codereview.chromium.org/2368293002/ )

Reason for revert:
Let's see if reverting this helps the roll.

Original issue's description:
> My take on SkAlign changes.
> 
> Like the other change, it makes SkAlignN(x) macros work for pointers, and
makes the macros themselves just syntax sugar for SkAlign<N>(x).  We can still
decide if we want to sed away the macros independently.
> 
> This just does it in a somewhat less repetitive way, and adds some tests.
> 
> BUG=skia:
> GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search?issue=2368293002
> 
> No public API changes.
> TBR=reed@google.com
> 
> Committed:
https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/e1a5f4e292384046678edc5c1e360b3e13dc118c

TBR=cblume@chromium.org,mtklein@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=skia:

Committed:
https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/6a259bfcc80a7b4765b99c7503e5a5b98b7e1523
==========

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-09-27 01:21:00]

Committed patchset #1 (id:1) as
https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/6a259bfcc80a7b4765b99c7503e5a5b98b7e1523