Initial prototype of object layout generation.

Initial prototype of object layout generation.

R=

[titzer, 2013-09-02 08:32:10]

https://codereview.chromium.org/23604020/diff/1/src/objects.layout
File src/objects.layout (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/23604020/diff/1/src/objects.layout#newcode56
src/objects.layout:56: { name: "value", comment: "the boxed contents." },
I guess a field without a type is just assumed to be tagged?

https://codereview.chromium.org/23604020/diff/1/src/objects.layout#newcode119
src/objects.layout:119: { name: "flag", type: tSmi, bitfield: [
Should we by default pack bools into a bitfield? And if we want a particular
boolean unpacked for fast access, then we could have an "unpacked" attribute.

[Jakob Kummerow, 2013-09-03 12:20:05]

https://codereview.chromium.org/23604020/diff/1/Makefile
File Makefile (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/23604020/diff/1/Makefile#newcode241
Makefile:241: .PHONY: all check clean dependencies $(ENVFILE).new native \
Should add objects here (and, while you're at it, grokdump)

[titzer, 2014-01-28 09:34:00]

On 2013/09/03 12:20:05, Jakob wrote:
> https://codereview.chromium.org/23604020/diff/1/Makefile
> File Makefile (right):
> 
> https://codereview.chromium.org/23604020/diff/1/Makefile#newcode241
> Makefile:241: .PHONY: all check clean dependencies $(ENVFILE).new native \
> Should add objects here (and, while you're at it, grokdump)

(Removed myself from this review to shorten my review list; add me back at the
next round).