Index: appengine/findit/common/rietveld.py |
diff --git a/appengine/findit/common/rietveld.py b/appengine/findit/common/rietveld.py |
index fab452cbd107029c3f3be7d7ac718975a4d3200a..d4b53abd12e756466724dd9c063ed555f21742c4 100644 |
--- a/appengine/findit/common/rietveld.py |
+++ b/appengine/findit/common/rietveld.py |
@@ -2,18 +2,28 @@ |
# Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be |
# found in the LICENSE file. |
+# TODO(wrengr): this file is only used by waterfall. We should either |
stgao
2016/10/13 05:47:32
This should go to an infra/ directory in the new c
wrengr
2016/10/27 17:28:00
Is there a bug ticket for doing the new layout? If
|
+# move it to that directory, or else factor out the dependency on |
+# HttpClientAppengine by abstracting over the HTTP_CLIENT member. The |
stgao
2016/10/13 05:47:32
Regarding the HTTP_CLIENT member, we could pass it
wrengr
2016/10/27 17:28:00
Acknowledged.
|
+# only thing we use/need HTTP_CLIENT for is to call the Post method, |
+# which could just as well be rewritten to use the __call__ method |
+# instead; hence, we could just pass an appropriate callable object to |
+# the constructor (incidentally allowing multiple Rietveld objects to |
+# share the same HTTP_CLIENT, if desired) rather than allocating our own |
+# one automatically. Does rietveld itself actually require appengine? |
+# Or is that just an incidental circumstance about our particular use |
+# of it? |
import logging |
import re |
import urlparse |
-from common.codereview import CodeReview |
stgao
2016/10/13 05:47:32
Please check my previous comment on why we wanted
|
from common.http_client_appengine import HttpClientAppengine |
_RIETVELD_ISSUE_NUMBER_RE = re.compile('^/(\d+)/?.*') |
-class Rietveld(CodeReview): |
+class Rietveld(object): |
"""The implementation of CodeReview interface for Rietveld.""" |
HTTP_CLIENT = HttpClientAppengine(follow_redirects=False) |