Index: Source/core/dom/DOMImplementation.idl |
diff --git a/Source/core/dom/DOMImplementation.idl b/Source/core/dom/DOMImplementation.idl |
index 0d627f502f92107592dfa2d34ac0c0801e7d6ea0..b45c529871fbe6baf284aad2ccd029f702ad787f 100644 |
--- a/Source/core/dom/DOMImplementation.idl |
+++ b/Source/core/dom/DOMImplementation.idl |
@@ -24,17 +24,16 @@ |
// DOM Level 1 |
- boolean hasFeature([Default=Undefined] optional DOMString feature, |
- [TreatNullAs=NullString,Default=Undefined] optional DOMString version); |
+ boolean hasFeature(DOMString feature, [TreatNullAs=NullString] DOMString version); |
arv (Not doing code reviews)
2013/08/14 15:08:22
These changes make little sense. A nullable param
|
// DOM Level 2 |
- [RaisesException] DocumentType createDocumentType([TreatNullAs=NullString, TreatUndefinedAs=NullString,Default=Undefined] optional DOMString qualifiedName, |
- [TreatNullAs=NullString, TreatUndefinedAs=NullString,Default=Undefined] optional DOMString publicId, |
- [TreatNullAs=NullString, TreatUndefinedAs=NullString,Default=Undefined] optional DOMString systemId); |
- [RaisesException] Document createDocument([TreatNullAs=NullString,Default=Undefined] optional DOMString namespaceURI, |
- [TreatNullAs=NullString,Default=Undefined] optional DOMString qualifiedName, |
- [TreatNullAs=NullString,Default=Undefined] optional DocumentType doctype); |
+ [RaisesException] DocumentType createDocumentType([TreatNullAs=NullString] DOMString qualifiedName, |
+ [TreatNullAs=NullString] DOMString publicId, |
+ [TreatNullAs=NullString] DOMString systemId); |
+ [RaisesException] Document createDocument([TreatNullAs=NullString] DOMString namespaceURI, |
arv (Not doing code reviews)
2013/08/14 15:08:22
I'm concerned about this one. I've seen people cal
do-not-use
2013/08/14 15:43:02
I agree that the last argument could be optional s
|
+ [TreatNullAs=NullString] DOMString qualifiedName, |
+ DocumentType doctype); |
// DOMImplementationCSS interface from DOM Level 2 CSS |