Revert of Let PowerSaveBlocker manager anchor view in Java side (patchset #3 id:40001 of https://co…

Revert of Let PowerSaveBlocker manager anchor view in Java side (patchset #3 id:40001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2259493005/ )

Reason for revert:
not needed. doesn't fix the regression.

Original issue's description:
> Let PowerSaveBlocker manager anchor view in Java side
>
> This reduces the number of native-to-Java calls by one
> with a view to mitigating the benchmark test regression
> introduced with https://crrev.com/2103243002.
> PowerSaveBlocker was the only class that created an anchor
> view during the test. Though the root cause not being
> entirely clear yet, having the view created on Java side
> can possibly help decrease the browser thread cpu consumption.
>
> BUG=635515
> TBR=tedchoc@chromium.org
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/bc403d8872340a62c310c9665e3b3972344c8c5b
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#413900}

TBR=twellington@chromium.org,boliu@chromium.org,tedchoc@chromium.org,jinsukkim@chromium.org
BUG=635515
NOTRY=True

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2279313005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#414818}
(cherry picked from commit eb47bc397e6d21f88b7017bc8b9276d86cd06bad)

Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/a55a139e311ceff3c5b253a2ab9ad1fb86f6e68f

[Jinsuk Kim, 2016-08-28 23:07:41]

Description was changed from

==========
Revert of Let PowerSaveBlocker manager anchor view in Java side (patchset #3
id:40001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2259493005/ )

Reason for revert:
not needed. doesn't fix the regression.

Original issue's description:
> Let PowerSaveBlocker manager anchor view in Java side
>
> This reduces the number of native-to-Java calls by one
> with a view to mitigating the benchmark test regression
> introduced with https://crrev.com/2103243002.
> PowerSaveBlocker was the only class that created an anchor
> view during the test. Though the root cause not being
> entirely clear yet, having the view created on Java side
> can possibly help decrease the browser thread cpu consumption.
>
> BUG=635515
> TBR=tedchoc@chromium.org
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/bc403d8872340a62c310c9665e3b3972344c8c5b
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#413900}

TBR=twellington@chromium.org,boliu@chromium.org,tedchoc@chromium.org,jinsukki...
BUG=635515
NOTRY=True

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2279313005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#414818}
(cherry picked from commit eb47bc397e6d21f88b7017bc8b9276d86cd06bad)
==========

to

==========
Revert of Let PowerSaveBlocker manager anchor view in Java side (patchset #3
id:40001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2259493005/ )

Reason for revert:
not needed. doesn't fix the regression.

Original issue's description:
> Let PowerSaveBlocker manager anchor view in Java side
>
> This reduces the number of native-to-Java calls by one
> with a view to mitigating the benchmark test regression
> introduced with https://crrev.com/2103243002.
> PowerSaveBlocker was the only class that created an anchor
> view during the test. Though the root cause not being
> entirely clear yet, having the view created on Java side
> can possibly help decrease the browser thread cpu consumption.
>
> BUG=635515
> TBR=tedchoc@chromium.org
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/bc403d8872340a62c310c9665e3b3972344c8c5b
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#413900}

TBR=twellington@chromium.org,boliu@chromium.org,tedchoc@chromium.org,jinsukki...
BUG=635515
NOTRY=True

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2279313005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#414818}
(cherry picked from commit eb47bc397e6d21f88b7017bc8b9276d86cd06bad)

Committed:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/a55a139e311ceff3c5b253a2ab9a...
==========

[Jinsuk Kim, 2016-08-28 23:07:44]

Committed patchset #1 (id:1) manually as
a55a139e311ceff3c5b253a2ab9ad1fb86f6e68f.