Revert of Let PowerSaveBlocker manager anchor view in Java side

Revert of Let PowerSaveBlocker manager anchor view in Java side (patchset #3 id:40001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2259493005/ )

Reason for revert:
not needed. doesn't fix the regression.

Original issue's description:
> Let PowerSaveBlocker manager anchor view in Java side
>
> This reduces the number of native-to-Java calls by one
> with a view to mitigating the benchmark test regression
> introduced with https://crrev.com/2103243002.
> PowerSaveBlocker was the only class that created an anchor
> view during the test. Though the root cause not being
> entirely clear yet, having the view created on Java side
> can possibly help decrease the browser thread cpu consumption.
>
> BUG=635515
> TBR=tedchoc@chromium.org
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/bc403d8872340a62c310c9665e3b3972344c8c5b
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#413900}

TBR=twellington@chromium.org,boliu@chromium.org,tedchoc@chromium.org,jinsukkim@chromium.org
# Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed more than 1 days ago.
BUG=635515
NOTRY=True

Committed: https://crrev.com/eb47bc397e6d21f88b7017bc8b9276d86cd06bad
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#414818}

[no sievers, 2016-08-26 20:42:52]

The CQ bit was checked by sievers@chromium.org

[no sievers, 2016-08-26 20:42:53]

Created Revert of Let PowerSaveBlocker manager anchor view in Java side

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-08-26 20:43:41]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 
https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...

[no sievers, 2016-08-26 21:32:06]

The CQ bit was unchecked by sievers@chromium.org

[no sievers, 2016-08-26 21:32:15]

Description was changed from

==========
Revert of Let PowerSaveBlocker manager anchor view in Java side (patchset #3
id:40001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2259493005/ )

Reason for revert:
not needed. doesn't fix the regression.

Original issue's description:
> Let PowerSaveBlocker manager anchor view in Java side
> 
> This reduces the number of native-to-Java calls by one
> with a view to mitigating the benchmark test regression
> introduced with https://crrev.com/2103243002.
> PowerSaveBlocker was the only class that created an anchor
> view during the test. Though the root cause not being
> entirely clear yet, having the view created on Java side
> can possibly help decrease the browser thread cpu consumption.
> 
> BUG=635515
> TBR=tedchoc@chromium.org
> 
> Committed: https://crrev.com/bc403d8872340a62c310c9665e3b3972344c8c5b
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#413900}

TBR=twellington@chromium.org,boliu@chromium.org,tedchoc@chromium.org,jinsukki...
# Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed more than 1 days ago.
BUG=635515
==========

to

==========
Revert of Let PowerSaveBlocker manager anchor view in Java side (patchset #3
id:40001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2259493005/ )

Reason for revert:
not needed. doesn't fix the regression.

Original issue's description:
> Let PowerSaveBlocker manager anchor view in Java side
> 
> This reduces the number of native-to-Java calls by one
> with a view to mitigating the benchmark test regression
> introduced with https://crrev.com/2103243002.
> PowerSaveBlocker was the only class that created an anchor
> view during the test. Though the root cause not being
> entirely clear yet, having the view created on Java side
> can possibly help decrease the browser thread cpu consumption.
> 
> BUG=635515
> TBR=tedchoc@chromium.org
> 
> Committed: https://crrev.com/bc403d8872340a62c310c9665e3b3972344c8c5b
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#413900}

TBR=twellington@chromium.org,boliu@chromium.org,tedchoc@chromium.org,jinsukki...
# Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed more than 1 days ago.
BUG=635515
NOTRY=True
==========

[no sievers, 2016-08-26 21:32:23]

The CQ bit was checked by sievers@chromium.org

[no sievers, 2016-08-26 21:33:04]

The CQ bit was unchecked by sievers@chromium.org

[no sievers, 2016-08-26 21:35:16]

The CQ bit was checked by sievers@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-08-26 21:36:11]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 
https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-08-26 21:41:48]

Description was changed from

==========
Revert of Let PowerSaveBlocker manager anchor view in Java side (patchset #3
id:40001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2259493005/ )

Reason for revert:
not needed. doesn't fix the regression.

Original issue's description:
> Let PowerSaveBlocker manager anchor view in Java side
> 
> This reduces the number of native-to-Java calls by one
> with a view to mitigating the benchmark test regression
> introduced with https://crrev.com/2103243002.
> PowerSaveBlocker was the only class that created an anchor
> view during the test. Though the root cause not being
> entirely clear yet, having the view created on Java side
> can possibly help decrease the browser thread cpu consumption.
> 
> BUG=635515
> TBR=tedchoc@chromium.org
> 
> Committed: https://crrev.com/bc403d8872340a62c310c9665e3b3972344c8c5b
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#413900}

TBR=twellington@chromium.org,boliu@chromium.org,tedchoc@chromium.org,jinsukki...
# Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed more than 1 days ago.
BUG=635515
NOTRY=True
==========

to

==========
Revert of Let PowerSaveBlocker manager anchor view in Java side (patchset #3
id:40001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2259493005/ )

Reason for revert:
not needed. doesn't fix the regression.

Original issue's description:
> Let PowerSaveBlocker manager anchor view in Java side
> 
> This reduces the number of native-to-Java calls by one
> with a view to mitigating the benchmark test regression
> introduced with https://crrev.com/2103243002.
> PowerSaveBlocker was the only class that created an anchor
> view during the test. Though the root cause not being
> entirely clear yet, having the view created on Java side
> can possibly help decrease the browser thread cpu consumption.
> 
> BUG=635515
> TBR=tedchoc@chromium.org
> 
> Committed: https://crrev.com/bc403d8872340a62c310c9665e3b3972344c8c5b
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#413900}

TBR=twellington@chromium.org,boliu@chromium.org,tedchoc@chromium.org,jinsukki...
# Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed more than 1 days ago.
BUG=635515
NOTRY=True
==========

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-08-26 21:41:49]

Committed patchset #1 (id:1)

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-08-26 21:43:53]

Description was changed from

==========
Revert of Let PowerSaveBlocker manager anchor view in Java side (patchset #3
id:40001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2259493005/ )

Reason for revert:
not needed. doesn't fix the regression.

Original issue's description:
> Let PowerSaveBlocker manager anchor view in Java side
> 
> This reduces the number of native-to-Java calls by one
> with a view to mitigating the benchmark test regression
> introduced with https://crrev.com/2103243002.
> PowerSaveBlocker was the only class that created an anchor
> view during the test. Though the root cause not being
> entirely clear yet, having the view created on Java side
> can possibly help decrease the browser thread cpu consumption.
> 
> BUG=635515
> TBR=tedchoc@chromium.org
> 
> Committed: https://crrev.com/bc403d8872340a62c310c9665e3b3972344c8c5b
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#413900}

TBR=twellington@chromium.org,boliu@chromium.org,tedchoc@chromium.org,jinsukki...
# Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed more than 1 days ago.
BUG=635515
NOTRY=True
==========

to

==========
Revert of Let PowerSaveBlocker manager anchor view in Java side (patchset #3
id:40001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2259493005/ )

Reason for revert:
not needed. doesn't fix the regression.

Original issue's description:
> Let PowerSaveBlocker manager anchor view in Java side
>
> This reduces the number of native-to-Java calls by one
> with a view to mitigating the benchmark test regression
> introduced with https://crrev.com/2103243002.
> PowerSaveBlocker was the only class that created an anchor
> view during the test. Though the root cause not being
> entirely clear yet, having the view created on Java side
> can possibly help decrease the browser thread cpu consumption.
>
> BUG=635515
> TBR=tedchoc@chromium.org
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/bc403d8872340a62c310c9665e3b3972344c8c5b
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#413900}

TBR=twellington@chromium.org,boliu@chromium.org,tedchoc@chromium.org,jinsukki...
# Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed more than 1 days ago.
BUG=635515
NOTRY=True

Committed: https://crrev.com/eb47bc397e6d21f88b7017bc8b9276d86cd06bad
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#414818}
==========

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-08-26 21:43:54]

Patchset 1 (id:??) landed as
https://crrev.com/eb47bc397e6d21f88b7017bc8b9276d86cd06bad
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#414818}