Type check field initializers in the correct context.

tests/language/regress_27104_test.dart

Index: tests/language/regress_27104_test.dart
diff --git a/tests/language/regress_25609_lib1.dart b/tests/language/regress_27104_test.dart
similarity index 70%
copy from tests/language/regress_25609_lib1.dart
copy to tests/language/regress_27104_test.dart
index 98fdb207d90e4ceda60a2078ee301a25e6fb6f89..75b625293ec82951c8e0018a345fa0f85ecbd8f9 100644
--- a/tests/language/regress_25609_lib1.dart
+++ b/tests/language/regress_27104_test.dart
@@ -2,9 +2,10 @@
 // for details. All rights reserved. Use of this source code is governed by a
 // BSD-style license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
 
-library regress_25609_lib1;
+// Regression test for issue 27401

[Siggi Cherem (dart-lang), 2016/08/18 14:46:09]

Let's rename the file and add some description here about what this is providing
coverage for. That way we can understand the test without having to lookup the
bug (also the bug doesn't have much details about what the problem is).

Suggestion:
 - filename: typecheck_multifield_declaration_test.dart
 - Description: Checks that we can correctly typecheck multi-variable
declarations on fields and top-levels. This is also a regression test for  Issue
27401.

[Johnni Winther, 2016/08/19 07:46:16]

Done.

 
-import 'regress_25609_lib2.dart';
+class A {}
 
-typedef Bar Foo(int y);
+A a = new A(), b = new A();

[Siggi Cherem (dart-lang), 2016/08/18 14:46:09]

Also - do we want to test it out on class fields too? E.g.:

class B {
  A x = new A(), y = new A();
}

main() => [new B().x, new B().y]

?

[Johnni Winther, 2016/08/19 07:46:16]

Done.

 
+main() => [a, b];