Index: third_party/WebKit/Source/core/fetch/RawResource.cpp |
diff --git a/third_party/WebKit/Source/core/fetch/RawResource.cpp b/third_party/WebKit/Source/core/fetch/RawResource.cpp |
index 4aec26459642a659fa5082df00c08e86779320d9..0605f7a2bca05e8ef86bdb911e09e2edb11e7fa6 100644 |
--- a/third_party/WebKit/Source/core/fetch/RawResource.cpp |
+++ b/third_party/WebKit/Source/core/fetch/RawResource.cpp |
@@ -122,14 +122,22 @@ void RawResource::didAddClient(ResourceClient* c) |
Resource::didAddClient(client); |
} |
-void RawResource::willFollowRedirect(ResourceRequest& newRequest, const ResourceResponse& redirectResponse) |
+bool RawResource::willFollowRedirect(ResourceRequest& newRequest, const ResourceResponse& redirectResponse) |
{ |
- Resource::willFollowRedirect(newRequest, redirectResponse); |
+ bool follow = Resource::willFollowRedirect(newRequest, redirectResponse); |
+ if (!follow) |
+ newRequest = ResourceRequest(); |
Nate Chapin
2016/09/06 16:46:14
Why is blanking the ResourceRequest needed?
tyoshino (SeeGerritForStatus)
2016/09/07 10:52:28
Ah, yeah. It's unnecessary. I just tried to make t
|
ASSERT(!redirectResponse.isNull()); |
ResourceClientWalker<RawResourceClient> w(clients()); |
- while (RawResourceClient* c = w.next()) |
- c->redirectReceived(this, newRequest, redirectResponse); |
+ while (RawResourceClient* c = w.next()) { |
+ if (!c->redirectReceived(this, newRequest, redirectResponse)) { |
+ follow = false; |
+ newRequest = ResourceRequest(); |
tyoshino (SeeGerritForStatus)
2016/09/07 10:52:28
This is to keep the clients see the same (possibly
Nate Chapin
2016/09/07 17:05:45
How much trouble would it be to change the behavio
tyoshino (SeeGerritForStatus)
2016/09/14 14:53:47
We need some clean
- one is https://codereview.chr
Nate Chapin
2016/09/14 22:25:27
OK.
|
+ } |
+ } |
+ |
+ return follow; |
} |
void RawResource::willNotFollowRedirect() |