Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(2650)

Unified Diff: base/task_scheduler/scheduler_lock_impl.cc

Issue 2213933003: Change EXPECT/ASSERT_DCHECK_DEATH macro to not expose the |regex| parameter. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@b2b0_simplethreadJoinable
Patch Set: Fix SchedulerLock unittests to actually generate a DCHECK, not an exception Created 4 years, 4 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « base/task_scheduler/priority_queue_unittest.cc ('k') | base/task_scheduler/scheduler_lock_unittest.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: base/task_scheduler/scheduler_lock_impl.cc
diff --git a/base/task_scheduler/scheduler_lock_impl.cc b/base/task_scheduler/scheduler_lock_impl.cc
index 7480e18da164edea00b7cafaed5d6e32ac86d835..c1acccd4fb8117094747bd8a4f1bd5b56bcdf7f5 100644
--- a/base/task_scheduler/scheduler_lock_impl.cc
+++ b/base/task_scheduler/scheduler_lock_impl.cc
@@ -67,19 +67,24 @@ class SafeAcquisitionTracker {
// Otherwise, make sure that the previous lock acquired is an allowed
// predecessor.
AutoLock auto_lock(allowed_predecessor_map_lock_);
+ // Using at() is exception-safe here as |lock| was registered already.
const SchedulerLockImpl* allowed_predecessor =
allowed_predecessor_map_.at(lock);
DCHECK_EQ(acquired_locks->back(), allowed_predecessor);
}
+ // This asserts that lock's registered predecessor is safe. Since registration
robliao 2016/08/04 17:25:20 This change should be pulled out of this CL. Nice
gab 2016/08/04 17:43:05 Done: https://codereview.chromium.org/2218443002/
+ // only happens at construction time, the predecessor is safe (no cycle
+ // possible) as long as it is either null or already registered.
void AssertSafePredecessor(const SchedulerLockImpl* lock) const {
allowed_predecessor_map_lock_.AssertAcquired();
- for (const SchedulerLockImpl* predecessor =
- allowed_predecessor_map_.at(lock);
- predecessor != nullptr;
- predecessor = allowed_predecessor_map_.at(predecessor)) {
- DCHECK_NE(predecessor, lock) <<
- "Scheduler lock predecessor cycle detected.";
+ // Using at() is exception-safe here as |lock| was registered already.
+ const SchedulerLockImpl* predecessor = allowed_predecessor_map_.at(lock);
+ if (predecessor) {
+ DCHECK(allowed_predecessor_map_.find(predecessor) !=
+ allowed_predecessor_map_.end())
+ << "SchedulerLock was registered before its predecessor. "
+ << "Potential cycle detected";
}
}
« no previous file with comments | « base/task_scheduler/priority_queue_unittest.cc ('k') | base/task_scheduler/scheduler_lock_unittest.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698