Chromium Code Reviews| Index: base/task_scheduler/scheduler_lock_impl.cc |
| diff --git a/base/task_scheduler/scheduler_lock_impl.cc b/base/task_scheduler/scheduler_lock_impl.cc |
| index 7480e18da164edea00b7cafaed5d6e32ac86d835..c1acccd4fb8117094747bd8a4f1bd5b56bcdf7f5 100644 |
| --- a/base/task_scheduler/scheduler_lock_impl.cc |
| +++ b/base/task_scheduler/scheduler_lock_impl.cc |
| @@ -67,19 +67,24 @@ class SafeAcquisitionTracker { |
| // Otherwise, make sure that the previous lock acquired is an allowed |
| // predecessor. |
| AutoLock auto_lock(allowed_predecessor_map_lock_); |
| + // Using at() is exception-safe here as |lock| was registered already. |
| const SchedulerLockImpl* allowed_predecessor = |
| allowed_predecessor_map_.at(lock); |
| DCHECK_EQ(acquired_locks->back(), allowed_predecessor); |
| } |
| + // This asserts that lock's registered predecessor is safe. Since registration |
|
robliao
2016/08/04 17:25:20
This change should be pulled out of this CL. Nice
gab
2016/08/04 17:43:05
Done: https://codereview.chromium.org/2218443002/
|
| + // only happens at construction time, the predecessor is safe (no cycle |
| + // possible) as long as it is either null or already registered. |
| void AssertSafePredecessor(const SchedulerLockImpl* lock) const { |
| allowed_predecessor_map_lock_.AssertAcquired(); |
| - for (const SchedulerLockImpl* predecessor = |
| - allowed_predecessor_map_.at(lock); |
| - predecessor != nullptr; |
| - predecessor = allowed_predecessor_map_.at(predecessor)) { |
| - DCHECK_NE(predecessor, lock) << |
| - "Scheduler lock predecessor cycle detected."; |
| + // Using at() is exception-safe here as |lock| was registered already. |
| + const SchedulerLockImpl* predecessor = allowed_predecessor_map_.at(lock); |
| + if (predecessor) { |
| + DCHECK(allowed_predecessor_map_.find(predecessor) != |
| + allowed_predecessor_map_.end()) |
| + << "SchedulerLock was registered before its predecessor. " |
| + << "Potential cycle detected"; |
| } |
| } |