Replace Closure in TaskRunner::PostTask with OneShotCallback

base/message_loop/message_loop_task_runner_unittest.cc

Index: base/message_loop/message_loop_task_runner_unittest.cc
diff --git a/base/message_loop/message_loop_task_runner_unittest.cc b/base/message_loop/message_loop_task_runner_unittest.cc
index 476eae563ea2cba238ac2eae4816afd773cccf06..3d22bae7b7e21bff2d47ac5bfe38f389d59d397e 100644
--- a/base/message_loop/message_loop_task_runner_unittest.cc
+++ b/base/message_loop/message_loop_task_runner_unittest.cc
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ TEST_F(MessageLoopTaskRunnerTest, PostTaskAndReply_Basic) {
   RunLoop().Run();
 
   EXPECT_EQ(task_thread_.message_loop(), task_run_on);
-  EXPECT_EQ(current_loop_.get(), task_deleted_on);
+  EXPECT_EQ(task_thread_.message_loop(), task_deleted_on);
   EXPECT_EQ(current_loop_.get(), reply_run_on);
   EXPECT_EQ(current_loop_.get(), reply_deleted_on);
   EXPECT_LT(task_delete_order, reply_delete_order);
@@ -238,10 +238,11 @@ TEST_F(MessageLoopTaskRunnerTest, PostTaskAndReply_DeadReplyLoopDoesNotDelete) {
   task_thread_.Stop();
 
   EXPECT_EQ(task_loop, task_run_on);
-  ASSERT_FALSE(task_deleted_on);
+  EXPECT_EQ(task_loop, task_deleted_on);
+  EXPECT_NE(-1, task_delete_order);
   EXPECT_FALSE(reply_run_on);
   ASSERT_FALSE(reply_deleted_on);
-  EXPECT_EQ(task_delete_order, reply_delete_order);
+  EXPECT_EQ(-1, reply_delete_order);
 
   // The PostTaskAndReplyRelay is leaked here.  Even if we had a reference to
   // it, we cannot just delete it because PostTaskAndReplyRelay's destructor