Chromium Code Reviews| Index: third_party/WebKit/Source/core/dom/Node.cpp |
| diff --git a/third_party/WebKit/Source/core/dom/Node.cpp b/third_party/WebKit/Source/core/dom/Node.cpp |
| index 84a8cea65e1140ef19992d5e3c884b1fd0ce5c1f..c4cf180839ef4ae124141a4e3fbc4879e58bd6b2 100644 |
| --- a/third_party/WebKit/Source/core/dom/Node.cpp |
| +++ b/third_party/WebKit/Source/core/dom/Node.cpp |
| @@ -557,9 +557,10 @@ bool Node::hasEditableStyle(EditableLevel editableLevel, UserSelectAllTreatment |
| for (const Node& node : NodeTraversal::inclusiveAncestorsOf(*this)) { |
| if ((node.isHTMLElement() || node.isDocumentNode()) && node.layoutObject()) { |
| + const bool isContentEditable = node.isHTMLElement() && toHTMLElement(node).contentEditable() == "true"; |
|
yosin_UTC9
2016/07/06 07:56:48
We should not check "contentEditable" attribute. e
yoichio
2016/07/07 07:57:02
Done.
|
| // Elements with user-select: all style are considered atomic |
| // therefore non editable. |
| - if (nodeIsUserSelectAll(&node) && treatment == UserSelectAllIsAlwaysNonEditable) |
| + if (!isContentEditable && nodeIsUserSelectAll(&node) && treatment == UserSelectAllIsAlwaysNonEditable) |
| return false; |
| switch (node.layoutObject()->style()->userModify()) { |
| case READ_ONLY: |