Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(56)

Issue 2091693002: It's not possible to build linux 32 bit on 64 bit host machine with gn (Closed)

Created:
4 years, 5 months ago by ckulakowski
Modified:
4 years, 5 months ago
Reviewers:
Dirk Pranke, scottmg
CC:
chromium-reviews, scottmg
Base URL:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Target Ref:
refs/pending/heads/master
Project:
chromium
Visibility:
Public.

Description

This fix adds possibility to provide path to directory containing sysroots for linux (32 bit and 64 bit). It's necessary if someone wants to make 32 bit build on 64 bit host with custom sysroot. Right now when custom sysroot is provided as gn parameter (target_sysroot) only 32 bit custom sysroot will be used. 64 bit sysroot (which is also needed by 32 bit build by - for example - protobuf) is expected to be found in default location. BUG=622616

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 2

Patch Set 2 : Fixup for previous commit. #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+12 lines, -2 lines) Patch
M build/config/sysroot.gni View 1 1 chunk +12 lines, -2 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 11 (4 generated)
ckulakowski
4 years, 5 months ago (2016-06-23 08:15:00 UTC) #3
scottmg
->Dirk
4 years, 5 months ago (2016-06-23 16:16:44 UTC) #5
Dirk Pranke
I think these changes are wrong. What problems are you seeing? We currently have a ...
4 years, 5 months ago (2016-06-23 16:22:43 UTC) #6
ckulakowski
On 2016/06/23 16:22:43, Dirk Pranke wrote: > I think these changes are wrong. What problems ...
4 years, 5 months ago (2016-06-24 09:19:36 UTC) #7
ckulakowski
On 2016/06/24 09:19:36, ckulakowski wrote: > On 2016/06/23 16:22:43, Dirk Pranke wrote: > > I ...
4 years, 5 months ago (2016-06-24 12:51:12 UTC) #8
Dirk Pranke
Yup, that would do it. I expect the fix may be somewhat complicated, though, and ...
4 years, 5 months ago (2016-06-24 19:43:34 UTC) #10
ckulakowski
4 years, 5 months ago (2016-06-27 08:08:02 UTC) #11
Message was sent while issue was closed.
On 2016/06/24 19:43:34, Dirk Pranke wrote:
> Yup, that would do it. I expect the fix may be somewhat complicated, though,
and
> we might want to use this as an excuse to refactor some of this logic.
> 
> I'm not sure what the best way to do it off-hand would be, so feel free to
have
> a go at it and we can start there.

Closed as I created new review: https://codereview.chromium.org/2096323002

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698