Index: chrome/renderer/leak_detector_remote_client.cc |
diff --git a/chrome/renderer/leak_detector_remote_client.cc b/chrome/renderer/leak_detector_remote_client.cc |
new file mode 100644 |
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..62f2526466c5d7c02cf6cc87c16392379d93517b |
--- /dev/null |
+++ b/chrome/renderer/leak_detector_remote_client.cc |
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@ |
+// Copyright 2016 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved. |
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be |
+// found in the LICENSE file. |
+ |
+#include "chrome/renderer/leak_detector_remote_client.h" |
+ |
+#include "base/bind.h" |
+#include "base/threading/thread_task_runner_handle.h" |
+#include "components/metrics/proto/memory_leak_report.pb.h" |
+#include "content/public/common/service_registry.h" |
+#include "content/public/renderer/render_thread.h" |
+#include "mojo/public/cpp/bindings/interface_request.h" |
+ |
+LeakDetectorRemoteClient::LeakDetectorRemoteClient() { |
+ // Connect to Mojo service. |
+ content::RenderThread::Get()->GetServiceRegistry()->ConnectToRemoteService( |
+ mojo::GetProxy(&remote_service_)); |
+ |
+ // It is safe to use base::Unretained(this). See example at: |
Ilya Sherman
2016/06/17 22:18:20
nit: For the first sentence, I'd add ", because |t
Simon Que
2016/06/18 04:17:53
Done.
|
+ // https://www.chromium.org/developers/design-documents/mojo/validation |
+ remote_service_->GetParams(base::Bind( |
+ &LeakDetectorRemoteClient::OnParamsReceived, base::Unretained(this))); |
+} |
+ |
+LeakDetectorRemoteClient::~LeakDetectorRemoteClient() { |
+ metrics::LeakDetector::GetInstance()->RemoveObserver(this); |
+} |
+ |
+void LeakDetectorRemoteClient::OnParamsReceived( |
+ mojo::StructPtr<metrics::LeakDetectorParams> result) { |
+ metrics::MemoryLeakReportProto::Params params; |
+ params.set_sampling_rate(result->sampling_rate); |
+ params.set_max_stack_depth(result->max_stack_depth); |
+ params.set_analysis_interval_bytes(result->analysis_interval_bytes); |
+ params.set_size_suspicion_threshold(result->size_suspicion_threshold); |
+ params.set_call_stack_suspicion_threshold( |
+ result->call_stack_suspicion_threshold); |
Ilya Sherman
2016/06/17 22:18:20
It's kind of a shame that Mojo can't pass protocol
|
+ |
+ metrics::LeakDetector* detector = metrics::LeakDetector::GetInstance(); |
+ detector->AddObserver(this); |
+ detector->Init(params, base::ThreadTaskRunnerHandle::Get()); |
+} |
+ |
+void LeakDetectorRemoteClient::OnLeaksFound( |
+ const std::vector<metrics::MemoryLeakReportProto>& reports) { |
+ mojo::Array<mojo::StructPtr<metrics::MemoryLeakReport>> result; |
+ |
+ for (const metrics::MemoryLeakReportProto& report : reports) { |
+ metrics::MemoryLeakReportPtr mojo_report = metrics::MemoryLeakReport::New(); |
+ mojo_report->size_bytes = report.size_bytes(); |
+ for (auto call_stack_value : report.call_stack()) { |
+ mojo_report->call_stack.push_back(call_stack_value); |
+ } |
+ for (const auto& history_entry : report.alloc_breakdown_history()) { |
+ metrics::AllocationBreakdownPtr mojo_entry = |
+ metrics::AllocationBreakdown::New(); |
+ for (auto count : history_entry.counts_by_size()) { |
+ mojo_entry->counts_by_size.push_back(count); |
+ } |
+ mojo_entry->count_for_call_stack = history_entry.count_for_call_stack(); |
+ |
+ mojo_report->alloc_breakdown_history.push_back(std::move(mojo_entry)); |
+ } |
+ result.push_back(std::move(mojo_report)); |
+ } |
+ |
+ remote_service_->SendLeakReports(std::move(result)); |
+} |