Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(2483)

Unified Diff: base/trace_event/process_memory_dump_unittest.cc

Issue 2006943003: [tracing] Sanitize process memory dumps for background mode (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@whitelist_mdp
Patch Set: Fixes. Created 4 years, 7 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: base/trace_event/process_memory_dump_unittest.cc
diff --git a/base/trace_event/process_memory_dump_unittest.cc b/base/trace_event/process_memory_dump_unittest.cc
index baec8683f5fec1c1c080c1c8ef17eb7115814a65..45d8ecf181a9b4a88e75a80f5cf85e84c80dc526 100644
--- a/base/trace_event/process_memory_dump_unittest.cc
+++ b/base/trace_event/process_memory_dump_unittest.cc
@@ -7,8 +7,10 @@
#include <stddef.h>
#include "base/memory/aligned_memory.h"
+#include "base/memory/ptr_util.h"
#include "base/process/process_metrics.h"
#include "base/trace_event/memory_allocator_dump_guid.h"
+#include "base/trace_event/memory_infra_background_whitelist.h"
#include "base/trace_event/trace_event_argument.h"
#include "testing/gtest/include/gtest/gtest.h"
@@ -16,14 +18,29 @@ namespace base {
namespace trace_event {
namespace {
+
+const MemoryDumpArgs kDetailedDumpArgs = {MemoryDumpLevelOfDetail::DETAILED};
+const char* const kTestDumpNameWhitelist[] = {"WhitelistedTestName", nullptr};
Primiano Tucci (use gerrit) 2016/06/02 20:24:04 I think you should move this below, because you re
ssid 2016/06/03 01:59:46 Hm it is bad i will be setting a global g_whitelis
+
TracedValue* GetHeapDump(const ProcessMemoryDump& pmd, const char* name) {
auto it = pmd.heap_dumps().find(name);
return it == pmd.heap_dumps().end() ? nullptr : it->second.get();
}
+
} // namespace
-TEST(ProcessMemoryDumpTest, Clear) {
- std::unique_ptr<ProcessMemoryDump> pmd1(new ProcessMemoryDump(nullptr));
+class ProcessMemoryDumpTest : public testing::Test {
+ protected:
+ MemoryAllocatorDump* CreateAllocatorDumpInPMD(ProcessMemoryDump* pmd,
+ const char* name) {
+ return pmd->AddAllocatorDumpInternal(WrapUnique(
+ new MemoryAllocatorDump(name, pmd, MemoryAllocatorDumpGuid())));
+ }
+};
+
+TEST_F(ProcessMemoryDumpTest, Clear) {
+ std::unique_ptr<ProcessMemoryDump> pmd1(
+ new ProcessMemoryDump(nullptr, kDetailedDumpArgs));
pmd1->CreateAllocatorDump("mad1");
pmd1->CreateAllocatorDump("mad2");
ASSERT_FALSE(pmd1->allocator_dumps().empty());
@@ -78,14 +95,14 @@ TEST(ProcessMemoryDumpTest, Clear) {
pmd1.reset();
}
-TEST(ProcessMemoryDumpTest, TakeAllDumpsFrom) {
+TEST_F(ProcessMemoryDumpTest, TakeAllDumpsFrom) {
std::unique_ptr<TracedValue> traced_value(new TracedValue);
hash_map<AllocationContext, AllocationMetrics> metrics_by_context;
metrics_by_context[AllocationContext()] = { 1, 1 };
TraceEventMemoryOverhead overhead;
std::unique_ptr<ProcessMemoryDump> pmd1(
- new ProcessMemoryDump(new MemoryDumpSessionState()));
+ new ProcessMemoryDump(new MemoryDumpSessionState(), kDetailedDumpArgs));
auto mad1_1 = pmd1->CreateAllocatorDump("pmd1/mad1");
auto mad1_2 = pmd1->CreateAllocatorDump("pmd1/mad2");
pmd1->AddOwnershipEdge(mad1_1->guid(), mad1_2->guid());
@@ -93,7 +110,7 @@ TEST(ProcessMemoryDumpTest, TakeAllDumpsFrom) {
pmd1->DumpHeapUsage(metrics_by_context, overhead, "pmd1/heap_dump2");
std::unique_ptr<ProcessMemoryDump> pmd2(
- new ProcessMemoryDump(new MemoryDumpSessionState()));
+ new ProcessMemoryDump(new MemoryDumpSessionState(), kDetailedDumpArgs));
auto mad2_1 = pmd2->CreateAllocatorDump("pmd2/mad1");
auto mad2_2 = pmd2->CreateAllocatorDump("pmd2/mad2");
pmd2->AddOwnershipEdge(mad2_1->guid(), mad2_2->guid());
@@ -148,8 +165,9 @@ TEST(ProcessMemoryDumpTest, TakeAllDumpsFrom) {
pmd1.reset();
}
-TEST(ProcessMemoryDumpTest, Suballocations) {
- std::unique_ptr<ProcessMemoryDump> pmd(new ProcessMemoryDump(nullptr));
+TEST_F(ProcessMemoryDumpTest, Suballocations) {
+ std::unique_ptr<ProcessMemoryDump> pmd(
+ new ProcessMemoryDump(nullptr, kDetailedDumpArgs));
const std::string allocator_dump_name = "fakealloc/allocated_objects";
pmd->CreateAllocatorDump(allocator_dump_name);
@@ -192,8 +210,9 @@ TEST(ProcessMemoryDumpTest, Suballocations) {
pmd.reset();
}
-TEST(ProcessMemoryDumpTest, GlobalAllocatorDumpTest) {
- std::unique_ptr<ProcessMemoryDump> pmd(new ProcessMemoryDump(nullptr));
+TEST_F(ProcessMemoryDumpTest, GlobalAllocatorDumpTest) {
+ std::unique_ptr<ProcessMemoryDump> pmd(
+ new ProcessMemoryDump(nullptr, kDetailedDumpArgs));
MemoryAllocatorDumpGuid shared_mad_guid(1);
auto shared_mad1 = pmd->CreateWeakSharedGlobalAllocatorDump(shared_mad_guid);
ASSERT_EQ(shared_mad_guid, shared_mad1->guid());
@@ -216,8 +235,59 @@ TEST(ProcessMemoryDumpTest, GlobalAllocatorDumpTest) {
ASSERT_EQ(MemoryAllocatorDump::Flags::DEFAULT, shared_mad1->flags());
}
+TEST_F(ProcessMemoryDumpTest, BackgroundModeTest) {
+ MemoryDumpArgs background_args = {MemoryDumpLevelOfDetail::BACKGROUND};
+ std::unique_ptr<ProcessMemoryDump> pmd(
+ new ProcessMemoryDump(nullptr, background_args));
+ SetAllocatorDumpNameWhitelistForTesting(kTestDumpNameWhitelist);
+ MemoryAllocatorDump* black_hole_mad = pmd->black_hole_mad_.get();
+
+ // Invalid dump names.
+ EXPECT_EQ(black_hole_mad,
+ CreateAllocatorDumpInPMD(pmd.get(), "NotWhitelistedTestName"));
Primiano Tucci (use gerrit) 2016/06/02 20:24:04 Isn't this going to hit all those DCHECKs? I guess
ssid 2016/06/03 01:59:46 No, I had to make the test class and call AddInter
+ EXPECT_EQ(black_hole_mad,
+ CreateAllocatorDumpInPMD(pmd.get(), "NotWhitelistedTestName"));
Primiano Tucci (use gerrit) 2016/06/02 20:24:04 I think this is identical to the above?
ssid 2016/06/03 01:59:46 fixed.
+ EXPECT_EQ(black_hole_mad, CreateAllocatorDumpInPMD(pmd.get(), "TestName"));
+ EXPECT_EQ(black_hole_mad,
+ CreateAllocatorDumpInPMD(pmd.get(), "Whitelisted/Test"));
+ EXPECT_EQ(black_hole_mad,
+ CreateAllocatorDumpInPMD(pmd.get(), "Not/Whitelisted/TestName"));
+ EXPECT_EQ(black_hole_mad,
+ CreateAllocatorDumpInPMD(pmd.get(), "Whitelisted/TestName/Google"));
+ EXPECT_EQ(black_hole_mad, CreateAllocatorDumpInPMD(
+ pmd.get(), "Whitelisted/TestName/0x1a2Google"));
+ EXPECT_EQ(black_hole_mad, CreateAllocatorDumpInPMD(
+ pmd.get(), "Whitelisted/TestName/__12/Google"));
+
+ // Global dumps.
+ MemoryAllocatorDumpGuid guid(1);
+ EXPECT_EQ(black_hole_mad, pmd->CreateSharedGlobalAllocatorDump(guid));
+ EXPECT_EQ(black_hole_mad, pmd->CreateWeakSharedGlobalAllocatorDump(guid));
+ EXPECT_EQ(black_hole_mad, pmd->GetSharedGlobalAllocatorDump(guid));
+
+ // Suballocations.
+ pmd->AddSuballocation(guid, "malloc/allocated_objects");
+ EXPECT_EQ(0u, pmd->allocator_dumps_edges_.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0u, pmd->allocator_dumps_.size());
+
+ // Valid dump names.
+ EXPECT_NE(black_hole_mad,
+ CreateAllocatorDumpInPMD(pmd.get(), "WhitelistedTestName"));
+ EXPECT_NE(black_hole_mad,
+ CreateAllocatorDumpInPMD(pmd.get(), "Whitelisted/TestName/0xA1b2"));
+ EXPECT_NE(black_hole_mad, CreateAllocatorDumpInPMD(
+ pmd.get(), "Whitelisted/TestName_123/0xab"));
+ EXPECT_NE(black_hole_mad, CreateAllocatorDumpInPMD(
+ pmd.get(), "Whitelisted_12/0xaB/TestName"));
+
+ // GetAllocatorDump is consistent.
+ EXPECT_EQ(black_hole_mad, pmd->GetAllocatorDump("NotWhitelistedTestName"));
+ auto mad = pmd->GetAllocatorDump("WhitelistedTestName");
+ EXPECT_NE(black_hole_mad, mad);
+}
+
#if defined(COUNT_RESIDENT_BYTES_SUPPORTED)
-TEST(ProcessMemoryDumpTest, CountResidentBytes) {
+TEST_F(ProcessMemoryDumpTest, CountResidentBytes) {
const size_t page_size = ProcessMemoryDump::GetSystemPageSize();
// Allocate few page of dirty memory and check if it is resident.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698