Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(952)

Unified Diff: content/browser/frame_host/navigation_controller_impl_browsertest.cc

Issue 1949213002: Don't update subframes on parent frame commits. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: Created 4 years, 7 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: content/browser/frame_host/navigation_controller_impl_browsertest.cc
diff --git a/content/browser/frame_host/navigation_controller_impl_browsertest.cc b/content/browser/frame_host/navigation_controller_impl_browsertest.cc
index 8fc6ec99bb8c6def3a697740ff1ec3739b2e5cd8..a92c5d229101e7e3d809541b6207cddf614c06f9 100644
--- a/content/browser/frame_host/navigation_controller_impl_browsertest.cc
+++ b/content/browser/frame_host/navigation_controller_impl_browsertest.cc
@@ -3562,6 +3562,14 @@ IN_PROC_BROWSER_TEST_F(NavigationControllerBrowserTest,
EXPECT_EQ(frame_url, frame->current_url());
+ // At this point the rest of the test is inapplicable. The bug that it tests
+ // to be gone had to be reintroduced.
Charlie Reis 2016/05/05 17:45:42 Can you clarify that the code below repros a NC_IN
Avi (use Gerrit) 2016/05/05 19:06:21 It does not. This browsertest tested the basic fu
Charlie Reis 2016/05/05 19:34:22 Oh! I must have misunderstood when reviewing the
Avi (use Gerrit) 2016/05/05 19:52:15 Yep.
+ //
+ // See the discussion in NavigationControllerImpl::FindFramesToNavigate for
+ // more information.
+ return;
Charlie Reis 2016/05/05 17:45:42 nit: No need for return or the blank line below, g
Avi (use Gerrit) 2016/05/05 19:06:21 Done.
+
+#if 0
// Go back. Because the old state had an empty frame, that should be restored
// even though it was replaced in the second navigation entry.
@@ -3575,6 +3583,7 @@ IN_PROC_BROWSER_TEST_F(NavigationControllerBrowserTest,
EXPECT_EQ(0, controller.GetLastCommittedEntryIndex());
EXPECT_EQ(GURL(url::kAboutBlankURL), frame->current_url());
+#endif
}
// This test is similar to "BackToAboutBlankIframe" above, except that a
@@ -3645,6 +3654,14 @@ IN_PROC_BROWSER_TEST_F(NavigationControllerBrowserTest,
EXPECT_EQ(frame_url_2, frame->current_url());
+ // At this point the rest of the test is inapplicable. The bug that it tests
+ // to be gone had to be reintroduced.
+ //
+ // See the discussion in NavigationControllerImpl::FindFramesToNavigate for
+ // more information.
+ return;
+
Charlie Reis 2016/05/05 17:45:42 Same nits.
Avi (use Gerrit) 2016/05/05 19:06:21 Done.
+#if 0
// Go back two entries. The original frame URL should be back.
TestFrameNavigationObserver observer(frame);
@@ -3657,6 +3674,7 @@ IN_PROC_BROWSER_TEST_F(NavigationControllerBrowserTest,
EXPECT_EQ(0, controller.GetLastCommittedEntryIndex());
EXPECT_EQ(frame_url_1, frame->current_url());
+#endif
}
// Ensure that we do not corrupt a NavigationEntry's PageState if a subframe

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698