Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(1832)

Unified Diff: cc/tiles/tile_manager.cc

Issue 1866043006: cc: Remove ScheduleOnOriginThread() and CompleteOnOriginThread(). (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: fixed bug 613529 Created 4 years, 7 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: cc/tiles/tile_manager.cc
diff --git a/cc/tiles/tile_manager.cc b/cc/tiles/tile_manager.cc
index 58fc640d8ddabec0022996ae04e2099c2d801543..74d12ef0c9ca64b8c10f1c1faf3eb1cf005171e9 100644
--- a/cc/tiles/tile_manager.cc
+++ b/cc/tiles/tile_manager.cc
@@ -43,7 +43,8 @@ DEFINE_SCOPED_UMA_HISTOGRAM_AREA_TIMER(
class RasterTaskImpl : public TileTask {
vmpstr 2016/05/21 00:02:14 We might want to restructure this task a bit. Spec
prashant.n 2016/05/21 00:33:53 Yes. I'll create two structures one for running ta
public:
- RasterTaskImpl(const Resource* resource,
+ RasterTaskImpl(TileManager* tile_manager,
+ Resource* resource,
scoped_refptr<RasterSource> raster_source,
const gfx::Rect& content_rect,
const gfx::Rect& invalid_content_rect,
@@ -52,15 +53,16 @@ class RasterTaskImpl : public TileTask {
TileResolution tile_resolution,
int layer_id,
uint64_t source_prepare_tiles_id,
- const void* tile,
+ Tile* tile,
uint64_t new_content_id,
uint64_t previous_content_id,
uint64_t resource_content_id,
int source_frame_number,
- const base::Callback<void(bool)>& reply,
+ std::unique_ptr<RasterBuffer> raster_buffer,
TileTask::Vector* dependencies,
bool supports_concurrent_execution)
: TileTask(supports_concurrent_execution, dependencies),
+ tile_manager_(tile_manager),
resource_(resource),
raster_source_(std::move(raster_source)),
content_rect_(content_rect),
@@ -75,7 +77,7 @@ class RasterTaskImpl : public TileTask {
previous_content_id_(previous_content_id),
resource_content_id_(resource_content_id),
source_frame_number_(source_frame_number),
- reply_(reply) {}
+ raster_buffer_(std::move(raster_buffer)) {}
// Overridden from Task:
void RunOnWorkerThread() override {
@@ -98,21 +100,17 @@ class RasterTaskImpl : public TileTask {
}
// Overridden from TileTask:
- void ScheduleOnOriginThread(RasterBufferProvider* provider) override {
- DCHECK(!raster_buffer_);
- raster_buffer_ = provider->AcquireBufferForRaster(
- resource_, resource_content_id_, previous_content_id_);
- }
- void CompleteOnOriginThread(RasterBufferProvider* provider) override {
- provider->ReleaseBufferForRaster(std::move(raster_buffer_));
- reply_.Run(!state().IsFinished());
+ void OnTaskCompleted() override {
+ tile_manager_->OnRasterTaskCompleted(std::move(raster_buffer_), tile_,
+ resource_, state().IsCanceled());
}
protected:
~RasterTaskImpl() override { DCHECK(!raster_buffer_); }
private:
- const Resource* resource_;
+ TileManager* tile_manager_;
+ Resource* resource_;
scoped_refptr<RasterSource> raster_source_;
gfx::Rect content_rect_;
gfx::Rect invalid_content_rect_;
@@ -121,12 +119,11 @@ class RasterTaskImpl : public TileTask {
TileResolution tile_resolution_;
int layer_id_;
uint64_t source_prepare_tiles_id_;
- const void* tile_;
+ Tile* tile_;
vmpstr 2016/05/21 00:02:14 The reason we had this as a void* is that it would
prashant.n 2016/05/21 00:33:53 Yes. I was thinking to add clousres here one for
uint64_t new_content_id_;
uint64_t previous_content_id_;
uint64_t resource_content_id_;
int source_frame_number_;
- const base::Callback<void(bool)> reply_;
std::unique_ptr<RasterBuffer> raster_buffer_;
DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(RasterTaskImpl);
@@ -188,7 +185,7 @@ void InsertNodeForDecodeTask(TaskGraph* graph,
if (task->dependencies().size()) {
DCHECK_EQ(task->dependencies().size(), 1u);
auto* dependency = task->dependencies()[0].get();
- if (!dependency->HasCompleted()) {
+ if (!dependency->state().IsFinished()) {
InsertNodeForDecodeTask(graph, dependency, use_foreground_category,
priority);
graph->edges.push_back(TaskGraph::Edge(dependency, task));
@@ -213,7 +210,7 @@ void InsertNodesForRasterTask(TaskGraph* graph,
TileTask* decode_task = it->get();
// Skip if already decoded.
- if (decode_task->HasCompleted())
+ if (decode_task->state().IsFinished())
continue;
dependencies++;
@@ -251,6 +248,14 @@ void InsertNodesForRasterTask(TaskGraph* graph,
dependencies);
}
+bool CheckDependenciesForFinishedRasterTask(TileTask* raster_task) {
vmpstr 2016/05/21 00:02:14 Our pattern is usually: void CheckFoo(Bar* bar) {
prashant.n 2016/05/21 00:33:53 Yes.
+ // If there is any dependency which is not finished, add a DCHECK for it.
+ for (auto& decode_task : raster_task->dependencies())
+ DCHECK(decode_task->state().IsFinished());
+
+ return true;
+}
+
class TaskSetFinishedTaskImpl : public TileTask {
public:
explicit TaskSetFinishedTaskImpl(
@@ -266,9 +271,7 @@ class TaskSetFinishedTaskImpl : public TileTask {
TaskSetFinished();
}
- // Overridden from TileTask:
- void ScheduleOnOriginThread(RasterBufferProvider* provider) override {}
- void CompleteOnOriginThread(RasterBufferProvider* provider) override {}
+ void OnTaskCompleted() override{};
protected:
~TaskSetFinishedTaskImpl() override {}
@@ -508,7 +511,6 @@ void TileManager::Flush() {
}
tile_task_manager_->CheckForCompletedTasks();
-
did_check_for_completed_tasks_since_last_schedule_tasks_ = true;
TRACE_EVENT_INSTANT1("cc", "DidFlush", TRACE_EVENT_SCOPE_THREAD, "stats",
@@ -795,7 +797,13 @@ void TileManager::ScheduleTasks(
tile->raster_task_ = CreateRasterTask(prioritized_tile);
TileTask* task = tile->raster_task_.get();
- DCHECK(!task->HasCompleted());
+
+ // Skip already finished raster task. Finished raster task should have all
+ // its dependencies finished.
+ if (task->state().IsFinished()) {
vmpstr 2016/05/21 00:02:14 In what situation can we be getting a finished tas
prashant.n 2016/05/21 00:33:53 See crbug.com/613529 for more details. I'll modify
+ DCHECK(CheckDependenciesForFinishedRasterTask(task));
+ continue;
+ }
if (tile->required_for_activation()) {
required_for_activate_count++;
@@ -915,25 +923,28 @@ scoped_refptr<TileTask> TileManager::CreateRasterTask(
}
bool supports_concurrent_execution = !use_gpu_rasterization_;
+ std::unique_ptr<RasterBuffer> raster_buffer =
+ tile_task_manager_->GetRasterBufferProvider()->AcquireBufferForRaster(
+ resource, resource_content_id, tile->invalidated_id());
return make_scoped_refptr(new RasterTaskImpl(
- resource, prioritized_tile.raster_source(), tile->content_rect(),
+ this, resource, prioritized_tile.raster_source(), tile->content_rect(),
tile->invalidated_content_rect(), tile->contents_scale(),
playback_settings, prioritized_tile.priority().resolution,
- tile->layer_id(), prepare_tiles_count_, static_cast<const void*>(tile),
- tile->id(), tile->invalidated_id(), resource_content_id,
- tile->source_frame_number(),
- base::Bind(&TileManager::OnRasterTaskCompleted, base::Unretained(this),
- tile->id(), resource),
- &decode_tasks, supports_concurrent_execution));
+ tile->layer_id(), prepare_tiles_count_, tile, tile->id(),
+ tile->invalidated_id(), resource_content_id, tile->source_frame_number(),
+ std::move(raster_buffer), &decode_tasks, supports_concurrent_execution));
}
void TileManager::OnRasterTaskCompleted(
- Tile::Id tile_id,
+ std::unique_ptr<RasterBuffer> raster_buffer,
+ Tile* tile,
Resource* resource,
bool was_canceled) {
- DCHECK(tiles_.find(tile_id) != tiles_.end());
+ DCHECK(tile);
+ DCHECK(tiles_.find(tile->id()) != tiles_.end());
+ tile_task_manager_->GetRasterBufferProvider()->ReleaseBufferForRaster(
+ std::move(raster_buffer));
- Tile* tile = tiles_[tile_id];
TileDrawInfo& draw_info = tile->draw_info();
DCHECK(tile->raster_task_.get());
orphan_tasks_.push_back(tile->raster_task_);

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698