Index: src/interpreter/bytecode-generator.cc |
diff --git a/src/interpreter/bytecode-generator.cc b/src/interpreter/bytecode-generator.cc |
index da04906d20a6345490978e552ba2ee1ca5bd69da..b45f2d5ca64a0302cc1c91499b3b9100058fca46 100644 |
--- a/src/interpreter/bytecode-generator.cc |
+++ b/src/interpreter/bytecode-generator.cc |
@@ -2285,8 +2285,13 @@ void BytecodeGenerator::VisitCall(Call* expr) { |
} |
builder()->SetExpressionPosition(expr); |
- builder()->Call(callee, receiver, 1 + args->length(), |
- feedback_index(expr->CallFeedbackICSlot())); |
+ if (call_type == Call::POSSIBLY_EVAL_CALL || |
+ call_type == Call::LOOKUP_SLOT_CALL) { |
rmcilroy
2016/02/12 14:21:03
Would this be the same if you did:
if (expr->CallF
mythria
2016/02/17 11:02:48
Done. Yes, indeed. I missed it but Lookup_slot_cal
|
+ builder()->Call(callee, receiver, 1 + args->length()); |
+ } else { |
+ builder()->CallIC(callee, receiver, 1 + args->length(), |
+ feedback_index(expr->CallFeedbackICSlot())); |
+ } |
execution_result()->SetResultInAccumulator(); |
} |