Revert of Either content elements or shadow elements should not be treated as insertion points if they are no…

Revert of Either content elements or shadow elements should not be treated as insertion points if they are no… (https://codereview.chromium.org/133213008/)

Reason for revert:
This patch might cause inconsistency between Polyfill and native Shadow DOM. It might be better to revert this patch until we have clear consensus for this change.

Original issue's description:
> Either content elements or shadow elements should not be treated as insertion points if they are not in document.
> 
> The relevant spec update: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/commit/69fbceabe01786ba3740728a6b86f5ec958f69b4
> 
> This behavior is similar to that of styles, which are not calculated for disconnected nodes.
> 
> This change also makes it possible to add an assertion, ASSERT(shadowRoot), for rootNode of an insertionPoint in InsertionPoint::isActive.
> 
> BUG=339029
> 
> Committed: https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/blink?view=rev&revision=166647

TBR=esprehn@google.com,dglazkov@chromium.org,morrita@chromium.org
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=339029
Committed: https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/blink?view=rev&revision=166802

[hayato, 2014-02-10 05:20:14]

Created Revert of Either content elements or shadow elements should not be
treated as insertion points if they are no…

[esprehn_google.com, 2014-02-10 05:35:45]

Lgtm

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to blink-reviews+unsubscribe@chromium.org.