Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(294)

Unified Diff: test/cctest/test-random-number-generator.cc

Issue 1467133006: Add test to check PRNG quality. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8.git@master
Patch Set: add license Created 5 years, 1 month ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « no previous file | no next file » | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: test/cctest/test-random-number-generator.cc
diff --git a/test/cctest/test-random-number-generator.cc b/test/cctest/test-random-number-generator.cc
index f5e05cb39636353bf8022ad9015f89ed4b003919..eb2193b034be4515ab73e80e44f75883be23fb8b 100644
--- a/test/cctest/test-random-number-generator.cc
+++ b/test/cctest/test-random-number-generator.cc
@@ -51,3 +51,135 @@ TEST(RandomSeedFlagIsUsed) {
i->Dispose();
}
}
+
+
+// The test below originates from Dart/Fletch with the following license:
+
+// Copyright (c) 2015, the Fletch project authors.
+// All rights reserved.
+//
+// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
+//
+// * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this
+// list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+//
+// * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice,
+// this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation
+// and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
+//
+// * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
+// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
+// this software without specific prior written permission.
+//
+// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS"
+// AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
+// IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
+// ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE
+// LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR
+// CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF
+// SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS
+// INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN
+// CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE)
+// ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE
+// POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
erikcorry 2015/11/24 13:45:14 You don't need this. It's written by me for Googl
Yang 2015/11/24 13:46:55 And... removed.
+
+// Chi squared for getting m 0s out of n bits.
+double ChiSquared(int m, int n) {
+ double ys_minus_np1 = (m - n / 2.0);
+ double chi_squared_1 = ys_minus_np1 * ys_minus_np1 * 2.0 / n;
+ double ys_minus_np2 = ((n - m) - n / 2.0);
+ double chi_squared_2 = ys_minus_np2 * ys_minus_np2 * 2.0 / n;
+ return chi_squared_1 + chi_squared_2;
+}
+
+
+// Test for correlations between recent bits from the PRNG, or bits that are
+// biased.
+TEST(RandomBitCorrelations) {
+ FLAG_random_seed = 31415926;
+ LocalContext env;
+ v8::Isolate* isolate = env->GetIsolate();
+ v8::HandleScope scope(isolate);
+ const char* source =
+ "(function() {"
+ " return (Math.random() * Math.pow(2, 32)) >>> 0;"
+ "})";
+ v8::Local<v8::Context> context = isolate->GetCurrentContext();
+ v8::Local<v8::Function> random_fun = v8::Local<v8::Function>::Cast(
+ CompileRun(context, source).ToLocalChecked());
+ v8::Local<v8::Value> undefined = v8::Undefined(isolate);
+
+#ifdef DEBUG
+ const int kHistory = 2;
+ const int kRepeats = 1000;
+#else
+ const int kHistory = 8;
+ const int kRepeats = 10000;
+#endif
+ uint32_t history[kHistory];
+ // The predictor bit is either constant 0 or 1, or one of the bits from the
+ // history.
+ for (int predictor_bit = -2; predictor_bit < 32; predictor_bit++) {
+ // The predicted bit is one of the bits from the PRNG.
+ for (int random_bit = 0; random_bit < 32; random_bit++) {
+ // The predicted bit is taken from the previous output of the PRNG.
+ for (int ago = 0; ago < kHistory; ago++) {
+ // We don't want to check whether each bit predicts itself.
+ if (ago == 0 && predictor_bit == random_bit) continue;
+
+ // Enter the new random value into the history
+ for (int i = ago; i >= 0; i--) {
+ v8::HandleScope scope(isolate);
+ history[i] = random_fun->Call(context, undefined, 0, NULL)
+ .ToLocalChecked()
+ ->Uint32Value(context)
+ .FromJust();
+ }
+
+ // Find out how many of the bits are the same as the prediction bit.
+ int m = 0;
+ for (int i = 0; i < kRepeats; i++) {
+ v8::HandleScope scope(isolate);
+ uint32_t random = random_fun->Call(context, undefined, 0, NULL)
+ .ToLocalChecked()
+ ->Uint32Value(context)
+ .FromJust();
+ for (int j = ago - 1; j >= 0; j--) history[j + 1] = history[j];
+ history[0] = random;
+
+ int predicted;
+ if (predictor_bit >= 0) {
+ predicted = (history[ago] >> predictor_bit) & 1;
+ } else {
+ predicted = predictor_bit == -2 ? 0 : 1;
+ }
+ int bit = (random >> random_bit) & 1;
+ if (bit == predicted) m++;
+ }
+
+ // Chi squared analysis for k = 2 (2, states: same/not-same) and one
+ // degree of freedom (k - 1).
+ double chi_squared = ChiSquared(m, kRepeats);
+ if (chi_squared > 24) {
+ int percent = static_cast<int>(m * 100.0 / kRepeats);
+ if (predictor_bit < 0) {
+ PrintF("Bit %d is %d %d%% of the time\n", random_bit,
+ predictor_bit == -2 ? 0 : 1, percent);
+ } else {
+ PrintF("Bit %d is the same as bit %d %d ago %d%% of the time\n",
+ random_bit, predictor_bit, ago, percent);
+ }
+ }
+
+ // For 1 degree of freedom this corresponds to 1 in a million. We are
+ // running ~8000 tests, so that would be surprising.
+ CHECK(chi_squared <= 24);
+
+ // If the predictor bit is a fixed 0 or 1 then it makes no sense to
+ // repeat the test with a different age.
+ if (predictor_bit < 0) break;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+}
« no previous file with comments | « no previous file | no next file » | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698