Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(109)

Unified Diff: net/quic/crypto/proof_verifier_chromium_test.cc

Issue 1454993002: QUIC - Code to verify SCT tag with certificate transparency verifier (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: Created 5 years, 1 month ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: net/quic/crypto/proof_verifier_chromium_test.cc
diff --git a/net/quic/crypto/proof_verifier_chromium_test.cc b/net/quic/crypto/proof_verifier_chromium_test.cc
index 9a7f0db86ff96bae69ab8436dc63e32781f70b0f..038756859699edbac6d259a4893281eb898ddb71 100644
--- a/net/quic/crypto/proof_verifier_chromium_test.cc
+++ b/net/quic/crypto/proof_verifier_chromium_test.cc
@@ -149,7 +149,8 @@ const char kTestConfig[] = "server config bytes";
// verification fails.
TEST(ProofVerifierChromiumTest, FailsIfCertFails) {
Eran Messeri 2015/11/18 11:14:00 Should there be another test case with non-null CT
Ryan Hamilton 2015/11/18 20:57:26 Agreed.
ramant (doing other things) 2015/11/21 00:27:03 Good point. Added tests. Done.
MockCertVerifier dummy_verifier;
- ProofVerifierChromium proof_verifier(&dummy_verifier, nullptr, nullptr);
+ ProofVerifierChromium proof_verifier(&dummy_verifier, nullptr, nullptr,
+ nullptr);
scoped_ptr<ProofVerifyContext> verify_context(
new ProofVerifyContextChromium(0 /*cert_verify_flags*/, BoundNetLog()));
@@ -171,7 +172,8 @@ TEST(ProofVerifierChromiumTest, FailsIfCertFails) {
// signature fails.
TEST(ProofVerifierChromiumTest, FailsIfSignatureFails) {
FailsTestCertVerifier cert_verifier;
- ProofVerifierChromium proof_verifier(&cert_verifier, nullptr, nullptr);
+ ProofVerifierChromium proof_verifier(&cert_verifier, nullptr, nullptr,
+ nullptr);
scoped_ptr<ProofVerifyContext> verify_context(
new ProofVerifyContextChromium(0 /*cert_verify_flags*/, BoundNetLog()));
@@ -202,7 +204,8 @@ TEST(ProofVerifierChromiumTest, PreservesEVIfNoPolicy) {
MockCertVerifier dummy_verifier;
dummy_verifier.AddResultForCert(test_cert.get(), dummy_result, OK);
- ProofVerifierChromium proof_verifier(&dummy_verifier, nullptr, nullptr);
+ ProofVerifierChromium proof_verifier(&dummy_verifier, nullptr, nullptr,
+ nullptr);
scoped_ptr<ProofVerifyContext> verify_context(
new ProofVerifyContextChromium(0 /*cert_verify_flags*/, BoundNetLog()));
@@ -242,7 +245,7 @@ TEST(ProofVerifierChromiumTest, PreservesEVIfAllowed) {
MockCertPolicyEnforcer policy_enforcer(true /*is_ev*/);
ProofVerifierChromium proof_verifier(&dummy_verifier, &policy_enforcer,
- nullptr);
+ nullptr, nullptr);
scoped_ptr<ProofVerifyContext> verify_context(
new ProofVerifyContextChromium(0 /*cert_verify_flags*/, BoundNetLog()));
@@ -282,7 +285,7 @@ TEST(ProofVerifierChromiumTest, StripsEVIfNotAllowed) {
MockCertPolicyEnforcer policy_enforcer(false /*is_ev*/);
ProofVerifierChromium proof_verifier(&dummy_verifier, &policy_enforcer,
- nullptr);
+ nullptr, nullptr);
scoped_ptr<ProofVerifyContext> verify_context(
new ProofVerifyContextChromium(0 /*cert_verify_flags*/, BoundNetLog()));
@@ -323,7 +326,7 @@ TEST(ProofVerifierChromiumTest, IgnoresPolicyEnforcerIfNotEV) {
FailsTestCertPolicyEnforcer policy_enforcer;
ProofVerifierChromium proof_verifier(&dummy_verifier, &policy_enforcer,
- nullptr);
+ nullptr, nullptr);
scoped_ptr<ProofVerifyContext> verify_context(
new ProofVerifyContextChromium(0 /*cert_verify_flags*/, BoundNetLog()));

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698