Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(40)

Issue 1416073002: Remove redundant webmediaplayer check (Closed)

Created:
5 years, 2 months ago by Srirama
Modified:
4 years, 7 months ago
Reviewers:
foolip
CC:
chromium-reviews, nessy, mlamouri+watch-blink_chromium.org, blink-reviews-html_chromium.org, gasubic, fs, eric.carlson_apple.com, feature-media-reviews_chromium.org, dglazkov+blink, blink-reviews, vcarbune.chromium
Base URL:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Target Ref:
refs/pending/heads/master
Project:
chromium
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Remove redundant webmediaplayer check Now that the issue 537013 is fixed, we can safely remove the webmediaplayer check when the readystate is more than HAVE_NOTHING

Patch Set 1 #

Patch Set 2 : Rebase #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+2 lines, -8 lines) Patch
M third_party/WebKit/Source/core/html/HTMLMediaElement.cpp View 1 2 chunks +2 lines, -8 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 29 (5 generated)
Srirama
PTAL. I think it is fine now to remove these checks. Even if clusterfuzz reports ...
5 years, 2 months ago (2015-10-22 05:15:39 UTC) #4
Srirama
5 years, 2 months ago (2015-10-22 05:16:16 UTC) #6
philipj_slow
How certain are you that the there's really no way for m_webMediaPlayer.clear() to happen without ...
5 years, 2 months ago (2015-10-22 07:00:53 UTC) #7
Srirama
On 2015/10/22 07:00:53, philipj wrote: > How certain are you that the there's really no ...
5 years, 2 months ago (2015-10-23 05:17:42 UTC) #8
philipj_slow
On 2015/10/23 05:17:42, Srirama wrote: > On 2015/10/22 07:00:53, philipj wrote: > > How certain ...
5 years, 2 months ago (2015-10-23 08:48:41 UTC) #9
Srirama
On 2015/10/23 08:48:41, philipj wrote: > On 2015/10/23 05:17:42, Srirama wrote: > > On 2015/10/22 ...
5 years, 2 months ago (2015-10-23 09:12:15 UTC) #10
philipj_slow
No, the --wrapper argument I think you could use to get the process into a ...
5 years, 2 months ago (2015-10-23 09:39:04 UTC) #11
philipj_slow
On 2015/10/23 09:39:04, philipj wrote: > No, the --wrapper argument I think you could use ...
5 years, 2 months ago (2015-10-23 09:42:34 UTC) #12
Srirama
On 2015/10/23 09:42:34, philipj wrote: > On 2015/10/23 09:39:04, philipj wrote: > > No, the ...
5 years, 2 months ago (2015-10-23 09:49:34 UTC) #13
Srirama
On 2015/10/23 09:49:34, Srirama wrote: > On 2015/10/23 09:42:34, philipj wrote: > > On 2015/10/23 ...
5 years, 1 month ago (2015-10-26 10:56:59 UTC) #14
philipj_slow
On 2015/10/26 10:56:59, Srirama wrote: > On 2015/10/23 09:49:34, Srirama wrote: > > On 2015/10/23 ...
5 years, 1 month ago (2015-10-26 11:09:03 UTC) #15
Srirama
On 2015/10/26 11:09:03, philipj wrote: > On 2015/10/26 10:56:59, Srirama wrote: > > On 2015/10/23 ...
5 years, 1 month ago (2015-10-26 11:13:09 UTC) #16
Srirama
On 2015/10/26 11:13:09, Srirama wrote: > On 2015/10/26 11:09:03, philipj wrote: > > On 2015/10/26 ...
5 years, 1 month ago (2015-11-01 17:51:30 UTC) #17
Srirama
On 2015/11/01 17:51:30, Srirama wrote: > On 2015/10/26 11:13:09, Srirama wrote: > > On 2015/10/26 ...
5 years, 1 month ago (2015-11-16 14:28:13 UTC) #18
philipj_slow
On 2015/11/01 17:51:30, Srirama wrote: > Hi Philip, Please find the detailed code analysis for ...
5 years, 1 month ago (2015-11-16 14:58:44 UTC) #19
Srirama
On 2015/11/16 14:58:44, philipj wrote: > On 2015/11/01 17:51:30, Srirama wrote: > > > Hi ...
5 years, 1 month ago (2015-11-17 14:10:06 UTC) #20
philipj_slow
On 2015/11/17 14:10:06, Srirama wrote: > On 2015/11/16 14:58:44, philipj wrote: > > On 2015/11/01 ...
5 years, 1 month ago (2015-11-17 14:49:04 UTC) #21
Srirama
On 2015/11/17 14:49:04, philipj wrote: > On 2015/11/17 14:10:06, Srirama wrote: > > On 2015/11/16 ...
5 years, 1 month ago (2015-11-18 08:35:13 UTC) #22
philipj_slow
On 2015/11/18 08:35:13, Srirama wrote: > "Still, it would be nice to have some invariants, ...
5 years, 1 month ago (2015-11-18 10:05:58 UTC) #23
Srirama
On 2015/11/18 10:05:58, philipj wrote: > On 2015/11/18 08:35:13, Srirama wrote: > > "Still, it ...
5 years, 1 month ago (2015-11-18 14:07:36 UTC) #24
Srirama
On 2015/11/18 14:07:36, Srirama wrote: > On 2015/11/18 10:05:58, philipj wrote: > > On 2015/11/18 ...
5 years, 1 month ago (2015-11-18 14:09:54 UTC) #25
philipj_slow
So, userCancelledLoad is a terrible name for what this actually does. It isn't called when ...
5 years, 1 month ago (2015-11-18 14:23:29 UTC) #26
philipj_slow
On 2015/11/18 14:23:29, philipj wrote: > So, userCancelledLoad is a terrible name for what this ...
5 years, 1 month ago (2015-11-18 14:24:33 UTC) #27
foolip
4 years, 7 months ago (2016-05-25 10:23:32 UTC) #29
Should this be closed?

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698