| Index: src/hydrogen-bce.cc
|
| diff --git a/src/hydrogen-bce.cc b/src/hydrogen-bce.cc
|
| deleted file mode 100644
|
| index 30c218f82a01834c00b0de9a5f30b2e9f7f34e82..0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
|
| --- a/src/hydrogen-bce.cc
|
| +++ /dev/null
|
| @@ -1,477 +0,0 @@
|
| -// Copyright 2013 the V8 project authors. All rights reserved.
|
| -// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
|
| -// found in the LICENSE file.
|
| -
|
| -#include "src/hydrogen-bce.h"
|
| -
|
| -namespace v8 {
|
| -namespace internal {
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -// We try to "factor up" HBoundsCheck instructions towards the root of the
|
| -// dominator tree.
|
| -// For now we handle checks where the index is like "exp + int32value".
|
| -// If in the dominator tree we check "exp + v1" and later (dominated)
|
| -// "exp + v2", if v2 <= v1 we can safely remove the second check, and if
|
| -// v2 > v1 we can use v2 in the 1st check and again remove the second.
|
| -// To do so we keep a dictionary of all checks where the key if the pair
|
| -// "exp, length".
|
| -// The class BoundsCheckKey represents this key.
|
| -class BoundsCheckKey : public ZoneObject {
|
| - public:
|
| - HValue* IndexBase() const { return index_base_; }
|
| - HValue* Length() const { return length_; }
|
| -
|
| - uint32_t Hash() {
|
| - return static_cast<uint32_t>(index_base_->Hashcode() ^ length_->Hashcode());
|
| - }
|
| -
|
| - static BoundsCheckKey* Create(Zone* zone,
|
| - HBoundsCheck* check,
|
| - int32_t* offset) {
|
| - if (!check->index()->representation().IsSmiOrInteger32()) return NULL;
|
| -
|
| - HValue* index_base = NULL;
|
| - HConstant* constant = NULL;
|
| - bool is_sub = false;
|
| -
|
| - if (check->index()->IsAdd()) {
|
| - HAdd* index = HAdd::cast(check->index());
|
| - if (index->left()->IsConstant()) {
|
| - constant = HConstant::cast(index->left());
|
| - index_base = index->right();
|
| - } else if (index->right()->IsConstant()) {
|
| - constant = HConstant::cast(index->right());
|
| - index_base = index->left();
|
| - }
|
| - } else if (check->index()->IsSub()) {
|
| - HSub* index = HSub::cast(check->index());
|
| - is_sub = true;
|
| - if (index->right()->IsConstant()) {
|
| - constant = HConstant::cast(index->right());
|
| - index_base = index->left();
|
| - }
|
| - } else if (check->index()->IsConstant()) {
|
| - index_base = check->block()->graph()->GetConstant0();
|
| - constant = HConstant::cast(check->index());
|
| - }
|
| -
|
| - if (constant != NULL && constant->HasInteger32Value() &&
|
| - constant->Integer32Value() != kMinInt) {
|
| - *offset = is_sub ? - constant->Integer32Value()
|
| - : constant->Integer32Value();
|
| - } else {
|
| - *offset = 0;
|
| - index_base = check->index();
|
| - }
|
| -
|
| - return new(zone) BoundsCheckKey(index_base, check->length());
|
| - }
|
| -
|
| - private:
|
| - BoundsCheckKey(HValue* index_base, HValue* length)
|
| - : index_base_(index_base),
|
| - length_(length) { }
|
| -
|
| - HValue* index_base_;
|
| - HValue* length_;
|
| -
|
| - DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(BoundsCheckKey);
|
| -};
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -// Data about each HBoundsCheck that can be eliminated or moved.
|
| -// It is the "value" in the dictionary indexed by "base-index, length"
|
| -// (the key is BoundsCheckKey).
|
| -// We scan the code with a dominator tree traversal.
|
| -// Traversing the dominator tree we keep a stack (implemented as a singly
|
| -// linked list) of "data" for each basic block that contains a relevant check
|
| -// with the same key (the dictionary holds the head of the list).
|
| -// We also keep all the "data" created for a given basic block in a list, and
|
| -// use it to "clean up" the dictionary when backtracking in the dominator tree
|
| -// traversal.
|
| -// Doing this each dictionary entry always directly points to the check that
|
| -// is dominating the code being examined now.
|
| -// We also track the current "offset" of the index expression and use it to
|
| -// decide if any check is already "covered" (so it can be removed) or not.
|
| -class BoundsCheckBbData: public ZoneObject {
|
| - public:
|
| - BoundsCheckKey* Key() const { return key_; }
|
| - int32_t LowerOffset() const { return lower_offset_; }
|
| - int32_t UpperOffset() const { return upper_offset_; }
|
| - HBasicBlock* BasicBlock() const { return basic_block_; }
|
| - HBoundsCheck* LowerCheck() const { return lower_check_; }
|
| - HBoundsCheck* UpperCheck() const { return upper_check_; }
|
| - BoundsCheckBbData* NextInBasicBlock() const { return next_in_bb_; }
|
| - BoundsCheckBbData* FatherInDominatorTree() const { return father_in_dt_; }
|
| -
|
| - bool OffsetIsCovered(int32_t offset) const {
|
| - return offset >= LowerOffset() && offset <= UpperOffset();
|
| - }
|
| -
|
| - bool HasSingleCheck() { return lower_check_ == upper_check_; }
|
| -
|
| - void UpdateUpperOffsets(HBoundsCheck* check, int32_t offset) {
|
| - BoundsCheckBbData* data = FatherInDominatorTree();
|
| - while (data != NULL && data->UpperCheck() == check) {
|
| - DCHECK(data->upper_offset_ < offset);
|
| - data->upper_offset_ = offset;
|
| - data = data->FatherInDominatorTree();
|
| - }
|
| - }
|
| -
|
| - void UpdateLowerOffsets(HBoundsCheck* check, int32_t offset) {
|
| - BoundsCheckBbData* data = FatherInDominatorTree();
|
| - while (data != NULL && data->LowerCheck() == check) {
|
| - DCHECK(data->lower_offset_ > offset);
|
| - data->lower_offset_ = offset;
|
| - data = data->FatherInDominatorTree();
|
| - }
|
| - }
|
| -
|
| - // The goal of this method is to modify either upper_offset_ or
|
| - // lower_offset_ so that also new_offset is covered (the covered
|
| - // range grows).
|
| - //
|
| - // The precondition is that new_check follows UpperCheck() and
|
| - // LowerCheck() in the same basic block, and that new_offset is not
|
| - // covered (otherwise we could simply remove new_check).
|
| - //
|
| - // If HasSingleCheck() is true then new_check is added as "second check"
|
| - // (either upper or lower; note that HasSingleCheck() becomes false).
|
| - // Otherwise one of the current checks is modified so that it also covers
|
| - // new_offset, and new_check is removed.
|
| - void CoverCheck(HBoundsCheck* new_check,
|
| - int32_t new_offset) {
|
| - DCHECK(new_check->index()->representation().IsSmiOrInteger32());
|
| - bool keep_new_check = false;
|
| -
|
| - if (new_offset > upper_offset_) {
|
| - upper_offset_ = new_offset;
|
| - if (HasSingleCheck()) {
|
| - keep_new_check = true;
|
| - upper_check_ = new_check;
|
| - } else {
|
| - TightenCheck(upper_check_, new_check, new_offset);
|
| - UpdateUpperOffsets(upper_check_, upper_offset_);
|
| - }
|
| - } else if (new_offset < lower_offset_) {
|
| - lower_offset_ = new_offset;
|
| - if (HasSingleCheck()) {
|
| - keep_new_check = true;
|
| - lower_check_ = new_check;
|
| - } else {
|
| - TightenCheck(lower_check_, new_check, new_offset);
|
| - UpdateLowerOffsets(lower_check_, lower_offset_);
|
| - }
|
| - } else {
|
| - // Should never have called CoverCheck() in this case.
|
| - UNREACHABLE();
|
| - }
|
| -
|
| - if (!keep_new_check) {
|
| - if (FLAG_trace_bce) {
|
| - base::OS::Print("Eliminating check #%d after tightening\n",
|
| - new_check->id());
|
| - }
|
| - new_check->block()->graph()->isolate()->counters()->
|
| - bounds_checks_eliminated()->Increment();
|
| - new_check->DeleteAndReplaceWith(new_check->ActualValue());
|
| - } else {
|
| - HBoundsCheck* first_check = new_check == lower_check_ ? upper_check_
|
| - : lower_check_;
|
| - if (FLAG_trace_bce) {
|
| - base::OS::Print("Moving second check #%d after first check #%d\n",
|
| - new_check->id(), first_check->id());
|
| - }
|
| - // The length is guaranteed to be live at first_check.
|
| - DCHECK(new_check->length() == first_check->length());
|
| - HInstruction* old_position = new_check->next();
|
| - new_check->Unlink();
|
| - new_check->InsertAfter(first_check);
|
| - MoveIndexIfNecessary(new_check->index(), new_check, old_position);
|
| - }
|
| - }
|
| -
|
| - BoundsCheckBbData(BoundsCheckKey* key,
|
| - int32_t lower_offset,
|
| - int32_t upper_offset,
|
| - HBasicBlock* bb,
|
| - HBoundsCheck* lower_check,
|
| - HBoundsCheck* upper_check,
|
| - BoundsCheckBbData* next_in_bb,
|
| - BoundsCheckBbData* father_in_dt)
|
| - : key_(key),
|
| - lower_offset_(lower_offset),
|
| - upper_offset_(upper_offset),
|
| - basic_block_(bb),
|
| - lower_check_(lower_check),
|
| - upper_check_(upper_check),
|
| - next_in_bb_(next_in_bb),
|
| - father_in_dt_(father_in_dt) { }
|
| -
|
| - private:
|
| - BoundsCheckKey* key_;
|
| - int32_t lower_offset_;
|
| - int32_t upper_offset_;
|
| - HBasicBlock* basic_block_;
|
| - HBoundsCheck* lower_check_;
|
| - HBoundsCheck* upper_check_;
|
| - BoundsCheckBbData* next_in_bb_;
|
| - BoundsCheckBbData* father_in_dt_;
|
| -
|
| - void MoveIndexIfNecessary(HValue* index_raw,
|
| - HBoundsCheck* insert_before,
|
| - HInstruction* end_of_scan_range) {
|
| - // index_raw can be HAdd(index_base, offset), HSub(index_base, offset),
|
| - // HConstant(offset) or index_base directly.
|
| - // In the latter case, no need to move anything.
|
| - if (index_raw->IsAdd() || index_raw->IsSub()) {
|
| - HArithmeticBinaryOperation* index =
|
| - HArithmeticBinaryOperation::cast(index_raw);
|
| - HValue* left_input = index->left();
|
| - HValue* right_input = index->right();
|
| - HValue* context = index->context();
|
| - bool must_move_index = false;
|
| - bool must_move_left_input = false;
|
| - bool must_move_right_input = false;
|
| - bool must_move_context = false;
|
| - for (HInstruction* cursor = end_of_scan_range; cursor != insert_before;) {
|
| - if (cursor == left_input) must_move_left_input = true;
|
| - if (cursor == right_input) must_move_right_input = true;
|
| - if (cursor == context) must_move_context = true;
|
| - if (cursor == index) must_move_index = true;
|
| - if (cursor->previous() == NULL) {
|
| - cursor = cursor->block()->dominator()->end();
|
| - } else {
|
| - cursor = cursor->previous();
|
| - }
|
| - }
|
| - if (must_move_index) {
|
| - index->Unlink();
|
| - index->InsertBefore(insert_before);
|
| - }
|
| - // The BCE algorithm only selects mergeable bounds checks that share
|
| - // the same "index_base", so we'll only ever have to move constants.
|
| - if (must_move_left_input) {
|
| - HConstant::cast(left_input)->Unlink();
|
| - HConstant::cast(left_input)->InsertBefore(index);
|
| - }
|
| - if (must_move_right_input) {
|
| - HConstant::cast(right_input)->Unlink();
|
| - HConstant::cast(right_input)->InsertBefore(index);
|
| - }
|
| - if (must_move_context) {
|
| - // Contexts are always constants.
|
| - HConstant::cast(context)->Unlink();
|
| - HConstant::cast(context)->InsertBefore(index);
|
| - }
|
| - } else if (index_raw->IsConstant()) {
|
| - HConstant* index = HConstant::cast(index_raw);
|
| - bool must_move = false;
|
| - for (HInstruction* cursor = end_of_scan_range; cursor != insert_before;) {
|
| - if (cursor == index) must_move = true;
|
| - if (cursor->previous() == NULL) {
|
| - cursor = cursor->block()->dominator()->end();
|
| - } else {
|
| - cursor = cursor->previous();
|
| - }
|
| - }
|
| - if (must_move) {
|
| - index->Unlink();
|
| - index->InsertBefore(insert_before);
|
| - }
|
| - }
|
| - }
|
| -
|
| - void TightenCheck(HBoundsCheck* original_check,
|
| - HBoundsCheck* tighter_check,
|
| - int32_t new_offset) {
|
| - DCHECK(original_check->length() == tighter_check->length());
|
| - MoveIndexIfNecessary(tighter_check->index(), original_check, tighter_check);
|
| - original_check->ReplaceAllUsesWith(original_check->index());
|
| - original_check->SetOperandAt(0, tighter_check->index());
|
| - if (FLAG_trace_bce) {
|
| - base::OS::Print("Tightened check #%d with offset %d from #%d\n",
|
| - original_check->id(), new_offset, tighter_check->id());
|
| - }
|
| - }
|
| -
|
| - DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(BoundsCheckBbData);
|
| -};
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -static bool BoundsCheckKeyMatch(void* key1, void* key2) {
|
| - BoundsCheckKey* k1 = static_cast<BoundsCheckKey*>(key1);
|
| - BoundsCheckKey* k2 = static_cast<BoundsCheckKey*>(key2);
|
| - return k1->IndexBase() == k2->IndexBase() && k1->Length() == k2->Length();
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -BoundsCheckTable::BoundsCheckTable(Zone* zone)
|
| - : ZoneHashMap(BoundsCheckKeyMatch, ZoneHashMap::kDefaultHashMapCapacity,
|
| - ZoneAllocationPolicy(zone)) { }
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -BoundsCheckBbData** BoundsCheckTable::LookupOrInsert(BoundsCheckKey* key,
|
| - Zone* zone) {
|
| - return reinterpret_cast<BoundsCheckBbData**>(
|
| - &(ZoneHashMap::LookupOrInsert(key, key->Hash(),
|
| - ZoneAllocationPolicy(zone))->value));
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -void BoundsCheckTable::Insert(BoundsCheckKey* key,
|
| - BoundsCheckBbData* data,
|
| - Zone* zone) {
|
| - ZoneHashMap::LookupOrInsert(key, key->Hash(), ZoneAllocationPolicy(zone))
|
| - ->value = data;
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -void BoundsCheckTable::Delete(BoundsCheckKey* key) {
|
| - Remove(key, key->Hash());
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -class HBoundsCheckEliminationState {
|
| - public:
|
| - HBasicBlock* block_;
|
| - BoundsCheckBbData* bb_data_list_;
|
| - int index_;
|
| -};
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -// Eliminates checks in bb and recursively in the dominated blocks.
|
| -// Also replace the results of check instructions with the original value, if
|
| -// the result is used. This is safe now, since we don't do code motion after
|
| -// this point. It enables better register allocation since the value produced
|
| -// by check instructions is really a copy of the original value.
|
| -void HBoundsCheckEliminationPhase::EliminateRedundantBoundsChecks(
|
| - HBasicBlock* entry) {
|
| - // Allocate the stack.
|
| - HBoundsCheckEliminationState* stack =
|
| - zone()->NewArray<HBoundsCheckEliminationState>(graph()->blocks()->length());
|
| -
|
| - // Explicitly push the entry block.
|
| - stack[0].block_ = entry;
|
| - stack[0].bb_data_list_ = PreProcessBlock(entry);
|
| - stack[0].index_ = 0;
|
| - int stack_depth = 1;
|
| -
|
| - // Implement depth-first traversal with a stack.
|
| - while (stack_depth > 0) {
|
| - int current = stack_depth - 1;
|
| - HBoundsCheckEliminationState* state = &stack[current];
|
| - const ZoneList<HBasicBlock*>* children = state->block_->dominated_blocks();
|
| -
|
| - if (state->index_ < children->length()) {
|
| - // Recursively visit children blocks.
|
| - HBasicBlock* child = children->at(state->index_++);
|
| - int next = stack_depth++;
|
| - stack[next].block_ = child;
|
| - stack[next].bb_data_list_ = PreProcessBlock(child);
|
| - stack[next].index_ = 0;
|
| - } else {
|
| - // Finished with all children; post process the block.
|
| - PostProcessBlock(state->block_, state->bb_data_list_);
|
| - stack_depth--;
|
| - }
|
| - }
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -BoundsCheckBbData* HBoundsCheckEliminationPhase::PreProcessBlock(
|
| - HBasicBlock* bb) {
|
| - BoundsCheckBbData* bb_data_list = NULL;
|
| -
|
| - for (HInstructionIterator it(bb); !it.Done(); it.Advance()) {
|
| - HInstruction* i = it.Current();
|
| - if (!i->IsBoundsCheck()) continue;
|
| -
|
| - HBoundsCheck* check = HBoundsCheck::cast(i);
|
| - int32_t offset = 0;
|
| - BoundsCheckKey* key =
|
| - BoundsCheckKey::Create(zone(), check, &offset);
|
| - if (key == NULL) continue;
|
| - BoundsCheckBbData** data_p = table_.LookupOrInsert(key, zone());
|
| - BoundsCheckBbData* data = *data_p;
|
| - if (data == NULL) {
|
| - bb_data_list = new(zone()) BoundsCheckBbData(key,
|
| - offset,
|
| - offset,
|
| - bb,
|
| - check,
|
| - check,
|
| - bb_data_list,
|
| - NULL);
|
| - *data_p = bb_data_list;
|
| - if (FLAG_trace_bce) {
|
| - base::OS::Print("Fresh bounds check data for block #%d: [%d]\n",
|
| - bb->block_id(), offset);
|
| - }
|
| - } else if (data->OffsetIsCovered(offset)) {
|
| - bb->graph()->isolate()->counters()->
|
| - bounds_checks_eliminated()->Increment();
|
| - if (FLAG_trace_bce) {
|
| - base::OS::Print("Eliminating bounds check #%d, offset %d is covered\n",
|
| - check->id(), offset);
|
| - }
|
| - check->DeleteAndReplaceWith(check->ActualValue());
|
| - } else if (data->BasicBlock() == bb) {
|
| - // TODO(jkummerow): I think the following logic would be preferable:
|
| - // if (data->Basicblock() == bb ||
|
| - // graph()->use_optimistic_licm() ||
|
| - // bb->IsLoopSuccessorDominator()) {
|
| - // data->CoverCheck(check, offset)
|
| - // } else {
|
| - // /* add pristine BCBbData like in (data == NULL) case above */
|
| - // }
|
| - // Even better would be: distinguish between read-only dominator-imposed
|
| - // knowledge and modifiable upper/lower checks.
|
| - // What happens currently is that the first bounds check in a dominated
|
| - // block will stay around while any further checks are hoisted out,
|
| - // which doesn't make sense. Investigate/fix this in a future CL.
|
| - data->CoverCheck(check, offset);
|
| - } else if (graph()->use_optimistic_licm() ||
|
| - bb->IsLoopSuccessorDominator()) {
|
| - int32_t new_lower_offset = offset < data->LowerOffset()
|
| - ? offset
|
| - : data->LowerOffset();
|
| - int32_t new_upper_offset = offset > data->UpperOffset()
|
| - ? offset
|
| - : data->UpperOffset();
|
| - bb_data_list = new(zone()) BoundsCheckBbData(key,
|
| - new_lower_offset,
|
| - new_upper_offset,
|
| - bb,
|
| - data->LowerCheck(),
|
| - data->UpperCheck(),
|
| - bb_data_list,
|
| - data);
|
| - if (FLAG_trace_bce) {
|
| - base::OS::Print("Updated bounds check data for block #%d: [%d - %d]\n",
|
| - bb->block_id(), new_lower_offset, new_upper_offset);
|
| - }
|
| - table_.Insert(key, bb_data_list, zone());
|
| - }
|
| - }
|
| -
|
| - return bb_data_list;
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -void HBoundsCheckEliminationPhase::PostProcessBlock(
|
| - HBasicBlock* block, BoundsCheckBbData* data) {
|
| - while (data != NULL) {
|
| - if (data->FatherInDominatorTree()) {
|
| - table_.Insert(data->Key(), data->FatherInDominatorTree(), zone());
|
| - } else {
|
| - table_.Delete(data->Key());
|
| - }
|
| - data = data->NextInBasicBlock();
|
| - }
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -} // namespace internal
|
| -} // namespace v8
|
|
|