Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(361)

Unified Diff: src/hydrogen-bce.cc

Issue 1405363003: Move Hydrogen and Lithium to src/crankshaft/ (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8.git@master
Patch Set: rebased Created 5 years, 2 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « src/hydrogen-bce.h ('k') | src/hydrogen-bch.h » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: src/hydrogen-bce.cc
diff --git a/src/hydrogen-bce.cc b/src/hydrogen-bce.cc
deleted file mode 100644
index 30c218f82a01834c00b0de9a5f30b2e9f7f34e82..0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
--- a/src/hydrogen-bce.cc
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,477 +0,0 @@
-// Copyright 2013 the V8 project authors. All rights reserved.
-// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
-// found in the LICENSE file.
-
-#include "src/hydrogen-bce.h"
-
-namespace v8 {
-namespace internal {
-
-
-// We try to "factor up" HBoundsCheck instructions towards the root of the
-// dominator tree.
-// For now we handle checks where the index is like "exp + int32value".
-// If in the dominator tree we check "exp + v1" and later (dominated)
-// "exp + v2", if v2 <= v1 we can safely remove the second check, and if
-// v2 > v1 we can use v2 in the 1st check and again remove the second.
-// To do so we keep a dictionary of all checks where the key if the pair
-// "exp, length".
-// The class BoundsCheckKey represents this key.
-class BoundsCheckKey : public ZoneObject {
- public:
- HValue* IndexBase() const { return index_base_; }
- HValue* Length() const { return length_; }
-
- uint32_t Hash() {
- return static_cast<uint32_t>(index_base_->Hashcode() ^ length_->Hashcode());
- }
-
- static BoundsCheckKey* Create(Zone* zone,
- HBoundsCheck* check,
- int32_t* offset) {
- if (!check->index()->representation().IsSmiOrInteger32()) return NULL;
-
- HValue* index_base = NULL;
- HConstant* constant = NULL;
- bool is_sub = false;
-
- if (check->index()->IsAdd()) {
- HAdd* index = HAdd::cast(check->index());
- if (index->left()->IsConstant()) {
- constant = HConstant::cast(index->left());
- index_base = index->right();
- } else if (index->right()->IsConstant()) {
- constant = HConstant::cast(index->right());
- index_base = index->left();
- }
- } else if (check->index()->IsSub()) {
- HSub* index = HSub::cast(check->index());
- is_sub = true;
- if (index->right()->IsConstant()) {
- constant = HConstant::cast(index->right());
- index_base = index->left();
- }
- } else if (check->index()->IsConstant()) {
- index_base = check->block()->graph()->GetConstant0();
- constant = HConstant::cast(check->index());
- }
-
- if (constant != NULL && constant->HasInteger32Value() &&
- constant->Integer32Value() != kMinInt) {
- *offset = is_sub ? - constant->Integer32Value()
- : constant->Integer32Value();
- } else {
- *offset = 0;
- index_base = check->index();
- }
-
- return new(zone) BoundsCheckKey(index_base, check->length());
- }
-
- private:
- BoundsCheckKey(HValue* index_base, HValue* length)
- : index_base_(index_base),
- length_(length) { }
-
- HValue* index_base_;
- HValue* length_;
-
- DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(BoundsCheckKey);
-};
-
-
-// Data about each HBoundsCheck that can be eliminated or moved.
-// It is the "value" in the dictionary indexed by "base-index, length"
-// (the key is BoundsCheckKey).
-// We scan the code with a dominator tree traversal.
-// Traversing the dominator tree we keep a stack (implemented as a singly
-// linked list) of "data" for each basic block that contains a relevant check
-// with the same key (the dictionary holds the head of the list).
-// We also keep all the "data" created for a given basic block in a list, and
-// use it to "clean up" the dictionary when backtracking in the dominator tree
-// traversal.
-// Doing this each dictionary entry always directly points to the check that
-// is dominating the code being examined now.
-// We also track the current "offset" of the index expression and use it to
-// decide if any check is already "covered" (so it can be removed) or not.
-class BoundsCheckBbData: public ZoneObject {
- public:
- BoundsCheckKey* Key() const { return key_; }
- int32_t LowerOffset() const { return lower_offset_; }
- int32_t UpperOffset() const { return upper_offset_; }
- HBasicBlock* BasicBlock() const { return basic_block_; }
- HBoundsCheck* LowerCheck() const { return lower_check_; }
- HBoundsCheck* UpperCheck() const { return upper_check_; }
- BoundsCheckBbData* NextInBasicBlock() const { return next_in_bb_; }
- BoundsCheckBbData* FatherInDominatorTree() const { return father_in_dt_; }
-
- bool OffsetIsCovered(int32_t offset) const {
- return offset >= LowerOffset() && offset <= UpperOffset();
- }
-
- bool HasSingleCheck() { return lower_check_ == upper_check_; }
-
- void UpdateUpperOffsets(HBoundsCheck* check, int32_t offset) {
- BoundsCheckBbData* data = FatherInDominatorTree();
- while (data != NULL && data->UpperCheck() == check) {
- DCHECK(data->upper_offset_ < offset);
- data->upper_offset_ = offset;
- data = data->FatherInDominatorTree();
- }
- }
-
- void UpdateLowerOffsets(HBoundsCheck* check, int32_t offset) {
- BoundsCheckBbData* data = FatherInDominatorTree();
- while (data != NULL && data->LowerCheck() == check) {
- DCHECK(data->lower_offset_ > offset);
- data->lower_offset_ = offset;
- data = data->FatherInDominatorTree();
- }
- }
-
- // The goal of this method is to modify either upper_offset_ or
- // lower_offset_ so that also new_offset is covered (the covered
- // range grows).
- //
- // The precondition is that new_check follows UpperCheck() and
- // LowerCheck() in the same basic block, and that new_offset is not
- // covered (otherwise we could simply remove new_check).
- //
- // If HasSingleCheck() is true then new_check is added as "second check"
- // (either upper or lower; note that HasSingleCheck() becomes false).
- // Otherwise one of the current checks is modified so that it also covers
- // new_offset, and new_check is removed.
- void CoverCheck(HBoundsCheck* new_check,
- int32_t new_offset) {
- DCHECK(new_check->index()->representation().IsSmiOrInteger32());
- bool keep_new_check = false;
-
- if (new_offset > upper_offset_) {
- upper_offset_ = new_offset;
- if (HasSingleCheck()) {
- keep_new_check = true;
- upper_check_ = new_check;
- } else {
- TightenCheck(upper_check_, new_check, new_offset);
- UpdateUpperOffsets(upper_check_, upper_offset_);
- }
- } else if (new_offset < lower_offset_) {
- lower_offset_ = new_offset;
- if (HasSingleCheck()) {
- keep_new_check = true;
- lower_check_ = new_check;
- } else {
- TightenCheck(lower_check_, new_check, new_offset);
- UpdateLowerOffsets(lower_check_, lower_offset_);
- }
- } else {
- // Should never have called CoverCheck() in this case.
- UNREACHABLE();
- }
-
- if (!keep_new_check) {
- if (FLAG_trace_bce) {
- base::OS::Print("Eliminating check #%d after tightening\n",
- new_check->id());
- }
- new_check->block()->graph()->isolate()->counters()->
- bounds_checks_eliminated()->Increment();
- new_check->DeleteAndReplaceWith(new_check->ActualValue());
- } else {
- HBoundsCheck* first_check = new_check == lower_check_ ? upper_check_
- : lower_check_;
- if (FLAG_trace_bce) {
- base::OS::Print("Moving second check #%d after first check #%d\n",
- new_check->id(), first_check->id());
- }
- // The length is guaranteed to be live at first_check.
- DCHECK(new_check->length() == first_check->length());
- HInstruction* old_position = new_check->next();
- new_check->Unlink();
- new_check->InsertAfter(first_check);
- MoveIndexIfNecessary(new_check->index(), new_check, old_position);
- }
- }
-
- BoundsCheckBbData(BoundsCheckKey* key,
- int32_t lower_offset,
- int32_t upper_offset,
- HBasicBlock* bb,
- HBoundsCheck* lower_check,
- HBoundsCheck* upper_check,
- BoundsCheckBbData* next_in_bb,
- BoundsCheckBbData* father_in_dt)
- : key_(key),
- lower_offset_(lower_offset),
- upper_offset_(upper_offset),
- basic_block_(bb),
- lower_check_(lower_check),
- upper_check_(upper_check),
- next_in_bb_(next_in_bb),
- father_in_dt_(father_in_dt) { }
-
- private:
- BoundsCheckKey* key_;
- int32_t lower_offset_;
- int32_t upper_offset_;
- HBasicBlock* basic_block_;
- HBoundsCheck* lower_check_;
- HBoundsCheck* upper_check_;
- BoundsCheckBbData* next_in_bb_;
- BoundsCheckBbData* father_in_dt_;
-
- void MoveIndexIfNecessary(HValue* index_raw,
- HBoundsCheck* insert_before,
- HInstruction* end_of_scan_range) {
- // index_raw can be HAdd(index_base, offset), HSub(index_base, offset),
- // HConstant(offset) or index_base directly.
- // In the latter case, no need to move anything.
- if (index_raw->IsAdd() || index_raw->IsSub()) {
- HArithmeticBinaryOperation* index =
- HArithmeticBinaryOperation::cast(index_raw);
- HValue* left_input = index->left();
- HValue* right_input = index->right();
- HValue* context = index->context();
- bool must_move_index = false;
- bool must_move_left_input = false;
- bool must_move_right_input = false;
- bool must_move_context = false;
- for (HInstruction* cursor = end_of_scan_range; cursor != insert_before;) {
- if (cursor == left_input) must_move_left_input = true;
- if (cursor == right_input) must_move_right_input = true;
- if (cursor == context) must_move_context = true;
- if (cursor == index) must_move_index = true;
- if (cursor->previous() == NULL) {
- cursor = cursor->block()->dominator()->end();
- } else {
- cursor = cursor->previous();
- }
- }
- if (must_move_index) {
- index->Unlink();
- index->InsertBefore(insert_before);
- }
- // The BCE algorithm only selects mergeable bounds checks that share
- // the same "index_base", so we'll only ever have to move constants.
- if (must_move_left_input) {
- HConstant::cast(left_input)->Unlink();
- HConstant::cast(left_input)->InsertBefore(index);
- }
- if (must_move_right_input) {
- HConstant::cast(right_input)->Unlink();
- HConstant::cast(right_input)->InsertBefore(index);
- }
- if (must_move_context) {
- // Contexts are always constants.
- HConstant::cast(context)->Unlink();
- HConstant::cast(context)->InsertBefore(index);
- }
- } else if (index_raw->IsConstant()) {
- HConstant* index = HConstant::cast(index_raw);
- bool must_move = false;
- for (HInstruction* cursor = end_of_scan_range; cursor != insert_before;) {
- if (cursor == index) must_move = true;
- if (cursor->previous() == NULL) {
- cursor = cursor->block()->dominator()->end();
- } else {
- cursor = cursor->previous();
- }
- }
- if (must_move) {
- index->Unlink();
- index->InsertBefore(insert_before);
- }
- }
- }
-
- void TightenCheck(HBoundsCheck* original_check,
- HBoundsCheck* tighter_check,
- int32_t new_offset) {
- DCHECK(original_check->length() == tighter_check->length());
- MoveIndexIfNecessary(tighter_check->index(), original_check, tighter_check);
- original_check->ReplaceAllUsesWith(original_check->index());
- original_check->SetOperandAt(0, tighter_check->index());
- if (FLAG_trace_bce) {
- base::OS::Print("Tightened check #%d with offset %d from #%d\n",
- original_check->id(), new_offset, tighter_check->id());
- }
- }
-
- DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(BoundsCheckBbData);
-};
-
-
-static bool BoundsCheckKeyMatch(void* key1, void* key2) {
- BoundsCheckKey* k1 = static_cast<BoundsCheckKey*>(key1);
- BoundsCheckKey* k2 = static_cast<BoundsCheckKey*>(key2);
- return k1->IndexBase() == k2->IndexBase() && k1->Length() == k2->Length();
-}
-
-
-BoundsCheckTable::BoundsCheckTable(Zone* zone)
- : ZoneHashMap(BoundsCheckKeyMatch, ZoneHashMap::kDefaultHashMapCapacity,
- ZoneAllocationPolicy(zone)) { }
-
-
-BoundsCheckBbData** BoundsCheckTable::LookupOrInsert(BoundsCheckKey* key,
- Zone* zone) {
- return reinterpret_cast<BoundsCheckBbData**>(
- &(ZoneHashMap::LookupOrInsert(key, key->Hash(),
- ZoneAllocationPolicy(zone))->value));
-}
-
-
-void BoundsCheckTable::Insert(BoundsCheckKey* key,
- BoundsCheckBbData* data,
- Zone* zone) {
- ZoneHashMap::LookupOrInsert(key, key->Hash(), ZoneAllocationPolicy(zone))
- ->value = data;
-}
-
-
-void BoundsCheckTable::Delete(BoundsCheckKey* key) {
- Remove(key, key->Hash());
-}
-
-
-class HBoundsCheckEliminationState {
- public:
- HBasicBlock* block_;
- BoundsCheckBbData* bb_data_list_;
- int index_;
-};
-
-
-// Eliminates checks in bb and recursively in the dominated blocks.
-// Also replace the results of check instructions with the original value, if
-// the result is used. This is safe now, since we don't do code motion after
-// this point. It enables better register allocation since the value produced
-// by check instructions is really a copy of the original value.
-void HBoundsCheckEliminationPhase::EliminateRedundantBoundsChecks(
- HBasicBlock* entry) {
- // Allocate the stack.
- HBoundsCheckEliminationState* stack =
- zone()->NewArray<HBoundsCheckEliminationState>(graph()->blocks()->length());
-
- // Explicitly push the entry block.
- stack[0].block_ = entry;
- stack[0].bb_data_list_ = PreProcessBlock(entry);
- stack[0].index_ = 0;
- int stack_depth = 1;
-
- // Implement depth-first traversal with a stack.
- while (stack_depth > 0) {
- int current = stack_depth - 1;
- HBoundsCheckEliminationState* state = &stack[current];
- const ZoneList<HBasicBlock*>* children = state->block_->dominated_blocks();
-
- if (state->index_ < children->length()) {
- // Recursively visit children blocks.
- HBasicBlock* child = children->at(state->index_++);
- int next = stack_depth++;
- stack[next].block_ = child;
- stack[next].bb_data_list_ = PreProcessBlock(child);
- stack[next].index_ = 0;
- } else {
- // Finished with all children; post process the block.
- PostProcessBlock(state->block_, state->bb_data_list_);
- stack_depth--;
- }
- }
-}
-
-
-BoundsCheckBbData* HBoundsCheckEliminationPhase::PreProcessBlock(
- HBasicBlock* bb) {
- BoundsCheckBbData* bb_data_list = NULL;
-
- for (HInstructionIterator it(bb); !it.Done(); it.Advance()) {
- HInstruction* i = it.Current();
- if (!i->IsBoundsCheck()) continue;
-
- HBoundsCheck* check = HBoundsCheck::cast(i);
- int32_t offset = 0;
- BoundsCheckKey* key =
- BoundsCheckKey::Create(zone(), check, &offset);
- if (key == NULL) continue;
- BoundsCheckBbData** data_p = table_.LookupOrInsert(key, zone());
- BoundsCheckBbData* data = *data_p;
- if (data == NULL) {
- bb_data_list = new(zone()) BoundsCheckBbData(key,
- offset,
- offset,
- bb,
- check,
- check,
- bb_data_list,
- NULL);
- *data_p = bb_data_list;
- if (FLAG_trace_bce) {
- base::OS::Print("Fresh bounds check data for block #%d: [%d]\n",
- bb->block_id(), offset);
- }
- } else if (data->OffsetIsCovered(offset)) {
- bb->graph()->isolate()->counters()->
- bounds_checks_eliminated()->Increment();
- if (FLAG_trace_bce) {
- base::OS::Print("Eliminating bounds check #%d, offset %d is covered\n",
- check->id(), offset);
- }
- check->DeleteAndReplaceWith(check->ActualValue());
- } else if (data->BasicBlock() == bb) {
- // TODO(jkummerow): I think the following logic would be preferable:
- // if (data->Basicblock() == bb ||
- // graph()->use_optimistic_licm() ||
- // bb->IsLoopSuccessorDominator()) {
- // data->CoverCheck(check, offset)
- // } else {
- // /* add pristine BCBbData like in (data == NULL) case above */
- // }
- // Even better would be: distinguish between read-only dominator-imposed
- // knowledge and modifiable upper/lower checks.
- // What happens currently is that the first bounds check in a dominated
- // block will stay around while any further checks are hoisted out,
- // which doesn't make sense. Investigate/fix this in a future CL.
- data->CoverCheck(check, offset);
- } else if (graph()->use_optimistic_licm() ||
- bb->IsLoopSuccessorDominator()) {
- int32_t new_lower_offset = offset < data->LowerOffset()
- ? offset
- : data->LowerOffset();
- int32_t new_upper_offset = offset > data->UpperOffset()
- ? offset
- : data->UpperOffset();
- bb_data_list = new(zone()) BoundsCheckBbData(key,
- new_lower_offset,
- new_upper_offset,
- bb,
- data->LowerCheck(),
- data->UpperCheck(),
- bb_data_list,
- data);
- if (FLAG_trace_bce) {
- base::OS::Print("Updated bounds check data for block #%d: [%d - %d]\n",
- bb->block_id(), new_lower_offset, new_upper_offset);
- }
- table_.Insert(key, bb_data_list, zone());
- }
- }
-
- return bb_data_list;
-}
-
-
-void HBoundsCheckEliminationPhase::PostProcessBlock(
- HBasicBlock* block, BoundsCheckBbData* data) {
- while (data != NULL) {
- if (data->FatherInDominatorTree()) {
- table_.Insert(data->Key(), data->FatherInDominatorTree(), zone());
- } else {
- table_.Delete(data->Key());
- }
- data = data->NextInBasicBlock();
- }
-}
-
-} // namespace internal
-} // namespace v8
« no previous file with comments | « src/hydrogen-bce.h ('k') | src/hydrogen-bch.h » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698