Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(682)

Issue 14018020: use forward matrix to determine if we can ignore scale part of a matrix (Closed)

Created:
7 years, 8 months ago by reed1
Modified:
7 years, 8 months ago
Reviewers:
robertphillips
CC:
skia-review_googlegroups.com
Visibility:
Public.

Description

use forward matrix to determine if we can ignore scale part of a matrix Committed: https://code.google.com/p/skia/source/detail?r=8700

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 5

Patch Set 2 : #

Patch Set 3 : #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+93 lines, -27 lines) Patch
A gm/bitmaprecttest.cpp View 1 2 1 chunk +67 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M gyp/gmslides.gypi View 1 2 1 chunk +1 line, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M src/core/SkBitmapProcState.cpp View 1 2 2 chunks +25 lines, -27 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 9 (0 generated)
reed1
unittest on the way...
7 years, 8 months ago (2013-04-15 19:21:51 UTC) #1
robertphillips
This is certainly clearer. https://codereview.chromium.org/14018020/diff/1/src/core/SkBitmapProcState.cpp File src/core/SkBitmapProcState.cpp (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/14018020/diff/1/src/core/SkBitmapProcState.cpp#newcode39 src/core/SkBitmapProcState.cpp:39: assert this now? https://codereview.chromium.org/14018020/diff/1/src/core/SkBitmapProcState.cpp#newcode67 src/core/SkBitmapProcState.cpp:67: ...
7 years, 8 months ago (2013-04-15 19:43:02 UTC) #2
reed1
https://codereview.chromium.org/14018020/diff/1/src/core/SkBitmapProcState.cpp File src/core/SkBitmapProcState.cpp (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/14018020/diff/1/src/core/SkBitmapProcState.cpp#newcode39 src/core/SkBitmapProcState.cpp:39: On 2013/04/15 19:43:02, robertphillips wrote: > assert this now? ...
7 years, 8 months ago (2013-04-15 20:00:26 UTC) #3
reed1
ptal
7 years, 8 months ago (2013-04-15 21:00:02 UTC) #4
robertphillips
lgtm. unit test?
7 years, 8 months ago (2013-04-15 21:42:22 UTC) #5
reed1
yea... a unit test seems harder than I thought. I can certainly create a GM ...
7 years, 8 months ago (2013-04-15 21:43:59 UTC) #6
robertphillips
I think a GM would also serve nicely. If this test ever becomes a predicate ...
7 years, 8 months ago (2013-04-15 21:48:01 UTC) #7
reed1
Committed patchset #3 manually as r8700.
7 years, 8 months ago (2013-04-16 17:14:48 UTC) #8
robertphillips
7 years, 8 months ago (2013-04-17 21:32:26 UTC) #9
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Reverted in r8731.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698