| Index: cc/trees/damage_tracker.cc
|
| diff --git a/cc/trees/damage_tracker.cc b/cc/trees/damage_tracker.cc
|
| index 698f9643b290a509e0e3aa83df651e16cd8fe3f4..71163d0ce670410bb859b34b74535db63d1543f4 100644
|
| --- a/cc/trees/damage_tracker.cc
|
| +++ b/cc/trees/damage_tracker.cc
|
| @@ -18,8 +18,7 @@ scoped_ptr<DamageTracker> DamageTracker::Create() {
|
|
|
| DamageTracker::DamageTracker()
|
| : current_rect_history_(new RectMap),
|
| - next_rect_history_(new RectMap),
|
| - force_full_damage_next_update_(false) {}
|
| + next_rect_history_(new RectMap) {}
|
|
|
| DamageTracker::~DamageTracker() {}
|
|
|
| @@ -131,10 +130,8 @@ void DamageTracker::UpdateDamageTrackingState(
|
|
|
| gfx::RectF damage_rect_for_this_update;
|
|
|
| - if (force_full_damage_next_update_ ||
|
| - target_surface_property_changed_only_from_descendant) {
|
| + if (target_surface_property_changed_only_from_descendant) {
|
| damage_rect_for_this_update = target_surface_content_rect;
|
| - force_full_damage_next_update_ = false;
|
| } else {
|
| // TODO(shawnsingh): can we clamp this damage to the surface's content rect?
|
| // (affects performance, but not correctness)
|
|
|