Sync core/timing/ interfaces with their specs, or lack thereof

Sync core/timing/ interfaces with their specs, or lack thereof

The only changes to the generated code are ordering and the added use
counters.

[Measure] does not mean that we should try to remove it, in cases where
usage is high we can use that data to ask for spec changes.

BUG=460722
Committed: https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/blink?view=rev&revision=198682

[philipj_slow, 2015-07-09 18:30:47]

philipj@opera.com changed reviewers:
+ ksakamoto@chromium.org

[philipj_slow, 2015-07-09 18:30:48]

Sakamoto-san, PTAL.

This is messier than many spec sync CLs, but Ilya had a nice document to
illustrate how it fits together:
https://github.com/w3c/performance-timeline/issues/32#issuecomment-119592114

If you'd like any or all of the TODOs, I'll gladly give them to you :)

[Kunihiko Sakamoto, 2015-07-10 06:37:56]

Very nice, thanks!

https://codereview.chromium.org/1219673003/diff/40001/Source/core/timing/Perf...
File Source/core/timing/Performance.idl (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/1219673003/diff/40001/Source/core/timing/Perf...
Source/core/timing/Performance.idl:50: // TODO(philipj): Unprefix thes APIs.
s/thes/these/

https://codereview.chromium.org/1219673003/diff/40001/Source/core/timing/Perf...
Source/core/timing/Performance.idl:60: // for this:
IIUC https://w3c.github.io/navigation-timing/ is called "Navigation Timing 2"
that is a separate spec from (and intended to eventually replace)
Navigation Timing (http://www.w3.org/TR/navigation-timing/).

So I don't think there is no "current spec" for them.

(igrigorik@ correct me if I'm wrong)

https://codereview.chromium.org/1219673003/diff/40001/Source/core/timing/Work...
File Source/core/timing/WorkerGlobalScopePerformance.idl (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/1219673003/diff/40001/Source/core/timing/Work...
Source/core/timing/WorkerGlobalScopePerformance.idl:31: // TODO(philipj): There
is no spec for Performance in workers:
Performance is defined here as [Exposed=(Window,Worker)]:
https://w3c.github.io/performance-timeline/#the-performance-interface

[philipj_slow, 2015-07-10 08:18:14]

https://codereview.chromium.org/1219673003/diff/40001/Source/core/timing/Perf...
File Source/core/timing/Performance.idl (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/1219673003/diff/40001/Source/core/timing/Perf...
Source/core/timing/Performance.idl:50: // TODO(philipj): Unprefix thes APIs.
On 2015/07/10 06:37:55, Kunihiko Sakamoto wrote:
> s/thes/these/

Done.

https://codereview.chromium.org/1219673003/diff/40001/Source/core/timing/Perf...
Source/core/timing/Performance.idl:60: // for this:
On 2015/07/10 06:37:55, Kunihiko Sakamoto wrote:
> IIUC https://w3c.github.io/navigation-timing/ is called "Navigation Timing 2"
> that is a separate spec from (and intended to eventually replace)
> Navigation Timing (http://www.w3.org/TR/navigation-timing/).
> 
> So I don't think there is no "current spec" for them.
> 
> (igrigorik@ correct me if I'm wrong)

I've removed the "there is no spec" bit and just link to
https://github.com/w3c/navigation-timing/issues/22

https://codereview.chromium.org/1219673003/diff/40001/Source/core/timing/Work...
File Source/core/timing/WorkerGlobalScopePerformance.idl (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/1219673003/diff/40001/Source/core/timing/Work...
Source/core/timing/WorkerGlobalScopePerformance.idl:31: // TODO(philipj): There
is no spec for Performance in workers:
On 2015/07/10 06:37:55, Kunihiko Sakamoto wrote:
> Performance is defined here as [Exposed=(Window,Worker)]:
> https://w3c.github.io/performance-timeline/#the-performance-interface

You're right, this was a bit confused. There's a spec for exposing the interface
in workers, but no way to get an instance in workers. I've updated this and
related TODOs to be less wrong :)

[Kunihiko Sakamoto, 2015-07-10 08:28:56]

lgtm

https://codereview.chromium.org/1219673003/diff/40001/Source/core/timing/Work...
File Source/core/timing/WorkerGlobalScopePerformance.idl (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/1219673003/diff/40001/Source/core/timing/Work...
Source/core/timing/WorkerGlobalScopePerformance.idl:31: // TODO(philipj): There
is no spec for Performance in workers:
On 2015/07/10 08:18:14, philipj wrote:
> On 2015/07/10 06:37:55, Kunihiko Sakamoto wrote:
> > Performance is defined here as [Exposed=(Window,Worker)]:
> > https://w3c.github.io/performance-timeline/#the-performance-interface
> 
> You're right, this was a bit confused. There's a spec for exposing the
interface
> in workers, but no way to get an instance in workers. I've updated this and
> related TODOs to be less wrong :)

Got it. :) Thanks!

[philipj_slow, 2015-07-10 11:31:54]

The CQ bit was checked by philipj@opera.com

[philipj_slow, 2015-07-10 11:31:54]

The patchset sent to the CQ was uploaded after l-g-t-m from
ksakamoto@chromium.org
Link to the patchset: https://codereview.chromium.org/1219673003/#ps80001
(title: "rebase")

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-07-10 11:32:12]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1219673003/80001

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-07-10 12:23:51]

Committed patchset #5 (id:80001) as
https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/blink?view=rev&revision=198682