Don't use ReversedListView from outside core and collection.

samples/swarm/swarm_ui_lib/observable/observable.dart

Index: samples/swarm/swarm_ui_lib/observable/observable.dart
diff --git a/samples/swarm/swarm_ui_lib/observable/observable.dart b/samples/swarm/swarm_ui_lib/observable/observable.dart
index 74a78bbd03803500ad08663f49006b84be9b9a38..356d10f7b5bee8329187c404df5c8c1a4ee0f743 100644
--- a/samples/swarm/swarm_ui_lib/observable/observable.dart
+++ b/samples/swarm/swarm_ui_lib/observable/observable.dart
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ class ObservableList<T>
     recordGlobalChange();
   }
 
-  List<T> get reversed => new ReversedListView<T>(this, 0, null);
+  List<T> get reversed => _internal.reversed;

[Lasse Reichstein Nielsen, 2013/01/29 08:11:22]

That works, but only because you can't assign through the reversed list.

[floitsch, 2013/01/29 15:41:07]

Should be ok then. If we change that behavior, we shouldn't forget to change it
here. Even if we forget, it should not be a big problem, since Swarm doesn't use
"reversed".

 
   void sort([int compare(var a, var b)]) {
     if (compare == null) compare = Comparable.compare;
@@ -285,6 +285,8 @@ class ObservableList<T>
   // Collection<T>:
   Iterable<T> where(bool f(T element)) => _internal.where(f);
   Iterable mappedBy(f(T element)) => _internal.mappedBy(f);
+  List<T> skip(int count) => _internal.skip(count);
+  List<T> take(int count) => _internal.take(count);
   bool every(bool f(T element)) => _internal.every(f);
   bool any(bool f(T element)) => _internal.any(f);
   void forEach(void f(T element)) { _internal.forEach(f); }