|
|
Chromium Code Reviews|
Created:
5 years, 6 months ago by zbowling_chromium Modified:
5 years, 6 months ago CC:
chromium-reviews Base URL:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master Target Ref:
refs/pending/heads/master Project:
chromium Visibility:
Public. |
DescriptionDisable domain reliability on low-mem Android
Domain reliability uses 400k+ of memory on the heap. Disabling it until it's
refactored when running on low memory devices.
BUG=495342
Committed: https://crrev.com/4f3fde9522466af7d678eebe9f6a0a1356a0326e
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#335767}
Patch Set 1 #
Total comments: 2
Patch Set 2 : update comments #Patch Set 3 : change order so we call DeviceClassManager later #
Total comments: 1
Patch Set 4 : spelling #Patch Set 5 : typo #Messages
Total messages: 23 (9 generated)
zbowling@chromium.org changed reviewers: + dskiba@google.com, mariakhomenko@chromium.org
This should hopefully do the trick.
zbowling@chromium.org changed reviewers: + cbentzel@chromium.org
The CQ bit was checked by zbowling@chromium.org
The CQ bit was unchecked by zbowling@chromium.org
lgtm
The CQ bit was checked by zbowling@chromium.org
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1203573002/1
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
Try jobs failed on following builders: linux_android_rel_ng on tryserver.chromium.linux (JOB_FAILED, http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.linux/builders/linux_android_r...)
cbentzel@chromium.org changed reviewers: + ttuttle@chromium.org
LGTM Does this impact any tests? https://codereview.chromium.org/1203573002/diff/1/chrome/android/java/src/org... File chrome/android/java/src/org/chromium/chrome/browser/init/ChromeBrowserInitializer.java (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/1203573002/diff/1/chrome/android/java/src/org... chrome/android/java/src/org/chromium/chrome/browser/init/ChromeBrowserInitializer.java:109: // TODO(zbowling): remove this after domain reliability is refactored. Can you add a link to a bug for this in the comment?
On 2015/06/23 12:20:44, cbentzel wrote: > LGTM > > Does this impact any tests? > > https://codereview.chromium.org/1203573002/diff/1/chrome/android/java/src/org... > File > chrome/android/java/src/org/chromium/chrome/browser/init/ChromeBrowserInitializer.java > (right): > > https://codereview.chromium.org/1203573002/diff/1/chrome/android/java/src/org... > chrome/android/java/src/org/chromium/chrome/browser/init/ChromeBrowserInitializer.java:109: > // TODO(zbowling): remove this after domain reliability is refactored. > Can you add a link to a bug for this in the comment? Only one odd test is having trouble but I'm investigating how it's related. I actually don't think we have too many tests that run when isLowMemDevice == true so we are unlikely to hit anything the way it's guarded. Raises a good question. I'll figure how many tests we actually run on low-mem/svelte devices on the trybots.
Thanks for looking into it. I'm guessing many devs don't run on low-mem devices for daily driver, so automation key to preventing regressions. On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:51 AM <zbowling@chromium.org> wrote: > On 2015/06/23 12:20:44, cbentzel wrote: > > LGTM > > > Does this impact any tests? > > > > https://codereview.chromium.org/1203573002/diff/1/chrome/android/java/src/org... > > File > > > chrome/android/java/src/org/chromium/chrome/browser/init/ChromeBrowserInitializer.java > > (right): > > > > https://codereview.chromium.org/1203573002/diff/1/chrome/android/java/src/org... > > > chrome/android/java/src/org/chromium/chrome/browser/init/ChromeBrowserInitializer.java:109: > > // TODO(zbowling): remove this after domain reliability is refactored. > > Can you add a link to a bug for this in the comment? > > Only one odd test is having trouble but I'm investigating how it's related. > I > actually don't think we have too many tests that run when isLowMemDevice == > true > so we are unlikely to hit anything the way it's guarded. Raises a good > question. > I'll figure how many tests we actually run on low-mem/svelte devices on the > trybots. > > https://codereview.chromium.org/1203573002/ > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to chromium-reviews+unsubscribe@chromium.org.
This breaks a completely unrelated test consistently on a trybot oddly. Especially weird because the test that is failing is not running on a low memory device and should be functioning the same as before. https://codereview.chromium.org/1203573002/diff/1/chrome/android/java/src/org... File chrome/android/java/src/org/chromium/chrome/browser/init/ChromeBrowserInitializer.java (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/1203573002/diff/1/chrome/android/java/src/org... chrome/android/java/src/org/chromium/chrome/browser/init/ChromeBrowserInitializer.java:109: // TODO(zbowling): remove this after domain reliability is refactored. On 2015/06/23 12:20:44, cbentzel wrote: > Can you add a link to a bug for this in the comment? Done.
The CQ bit was checked by zbowling@chromium.org
The patchset sent to the CQ was uploaded after l-g-t-m from cbentzel@chromium.org, mariakhomenko@chromium.org Link to the patchset: https://codereview.chromium.org/1203573002/#ps40001 (title: "change order so we call DeviceClassManager later")
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1203573002/40001
https://codereview.chromium.org/1203573002/diff/40001/chrome/android/java/src... File chrome/android/java/src/org/chromium/chrome/browser/init/ChromeBrowserInitializer.java (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/1203573002/diff/40001/chrome/android/java/src... chrome/android/java/src/org/chromium/chrome/browser/init/ChromeBrowserInitializer.java:96: private void preInflationStatupDone() { Statup -> Startup
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Committed patchset #3 (id:40001)
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Patchset 3 (id:??) landed as https://crrev.com/4f3fde9522466af7d678eebe9f6a0a1356a0326e Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#335767}
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Fixed the typo. |
