[es6] Bound function names

[es6] Bound function names

https://people.mozilla.org/~jorendorff/es6-draft.html#sec-function.prototype.bind

Bound functions should have a name based on the function that was
bound.

BUG=N
LOG=N
R=adamk   CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng;tryserver.blink:linux_blink_rel

Committed: https://crrev.com/4e2a673881c55a13124dd62f2d05c8d9fe233cd3
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28968}

[arv (Not doing code reviews), 2015-06-11 17:13:31]

PTAL

[adamk, 2015-06-11 17:41:35]

lgtm

[arv (Not doing code reviews), 2015-06-11 17:47:24]

Thanks.

https://codereview.chromium.org/1182513002/diff/1/test/mjsunit/function-bind-...
File test/mjsunit/function-bind-name.js (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/1182513002/diff/1/test/mjsunit/function-bind-...
test/mjsunit/function-bind-name.js:12: assertEquals('bound ', fb2.name);
This is kind of ugly but I don't care enough to have the spec changed.

[arv (Not doing code reviews), 2015-06-11 20:05:02]

The CQ bit was checked by arv@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-06-11 20:05:21]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1182513002/1

[arv (Not doing code reviews), 2015-06-11 20:15:28]

The CQ bit was unchecked by arv@chromium.org

[arv (Not doing code reviews), 2015-06-11 20:15:59]

The CQ bit was checked by arv@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-06-11 20:16:13]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1182513002/1

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-06-11 20:36:42]

Committed patchset #1 (id:1)

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-06-11 20:36:59]

Patchset 1 (id:??) landed as
https://crrev.com/4e2a673881c55a13124dd62f2d05c8d9fe233cd3
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28968}

[Michael Achenbach, 2015-06-12 06:49:19]

A revert of this CL (patchset #1 id:1) has been created in
https://codereview.chromium.org/1186463002/ by machenbach@chromium.org.

The reason for reverting is: [Sheriff] Speculative revert for changing layout
tests:
https://storage.googleapis.com/chromium-layout-test-archives/V8-Blink_Linux_3...

Exact blame assignment is not possible as our blink bots were in a bad state for
a few builds..

[Michael Achenbach, 2015-06-12 07:06:24]

Note: In case you submitted a blink CL in the mean time, please always leave a
note about that on the v8-side CL, then I don't revert.

Note2: Your CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS lacks a linebreak, otherwise the tests would have
run I guess.

[arv (Not doing code reviews), 2015-06-12 10:08:51]

On 2015/06/12 at 07:06:24, machenbach wrote:
> Note: In case you submitted a blink CL in the mean time, please always leave a
note about that on the v8-side CL, then I don't revert.

This time I didn't do a blink cl first. I didn't think blink would have tests
impacted by this but to be sure I added the blink bot.

> Note2: Your CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS lacks a linebreak, otherwise the tests would
have run I guess.

Sigh.